zero tolerance. anything not expressly true will evolve to be expressly false.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-24 21:45:00 UTC
zero tolerance. anything not expressly true will evolve to be expressly false.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-24 21:45:00 UTC
I would like to see the academy drop political ‘science’, sociology, philosophy, literature, history, and anything else that does not have a method of testing internal consistency and external correspondence by some sort of calculation whether quantitative, or algorithmic, or by triangulation. Including a ban on the use of students for any form of study whatsoever, and any behavioral test of less than 1000 people. In other words, if you can’t raise enough money to produce a self-falsifying study then you need to find another career.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-24 13:22:00 UTC
I don’t accept the *fallacy of special pleading* that ‘meaningfulness’ or ‘accessibility’ are any more important than the hard work of truth.
I mean, we teach expensive literacy, mathematics, sciences, economics, and history. And we in the past taught expensive vocabulary, grammar, logic, and rhetoric.
Why is it that we cannot also teach expensive testimonialism: natural law and the logic of cooperation?
Why can’t we teach history as a series of biographical narratives of the people who made the great insights and transformations in each of those fields?
Even if you want to preserve the Buddha and Jesus why cannot they be stated in historical terms and studied for their innovations, rather than continuing their justification by abrahamic deception?
You know, there isn’t any reason. Because any other reason requires lying and teaching lying
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-24 06:31:00 UTC
My very simple reasoning:
*I place a higher value on truth, reason, and the elimination of error, despite the higher cost, than I place on meaningfulness, intuition, and the identification of opportunities despite the lower cost.*
It’s that simple.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-24 06:29:00 UTC
REALITY
1 – Identity tests categories.
2 – Logic tests internal consistency.
3 – Action tests correspondence. (space, time, and causality)
4 – Rational action tests incentives – rational choice consistency.
5 – Reciprocity tests moral – rational exchange consistency
6 – Full accounting and limits test scope consistency.
7 – Narrative by analogy to perception describes reality – coherence (total consistency)
Reality is explained by narrative, and the narrative survives falsification by identity, logic, action, reason, reciprocity, and scope.
We test statements about the world by deflating each dimension and testing each for consistency.
Each sub dimension can only be tested by use of the next dimension.
The only native skill we possess is the test of “differences”. Because our brains use samples of inputs in combination with memory to predict results and alert us through new stimulation to the differences.
Our brains sample senses, provide certain services, the hierarchical (distilled) result of which are combined (conflated) through memory and backward propagation into ‘experience’.
It turns out that except in rare cases we ‘experience’ a fairly accurate model of the physical world – but an absurdly inaccurate model of the social world, and completely nonsensical model of our personal value to that world. All of which are precisely what is necessary to survive as sentient (feeling of changes in state) and conscious (self aware) life form when possessed of uncomfortable knowledge in a universe of consistent risk.
This is a much more simple way of explaining Hume, Kant, and the Phenomenologists.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 19:57:00 UTC
And eugenic vs dysgenic decidability is not a comforting test of true, good, preferable, and possible.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 13:52:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888758711623221250
Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888101459614683140
IN REPLY TO:
@AlanLevinovitz
Agreed. So we must fight (gently, kindly, firmly) for the tools and virtues that keep truth from splitting in two. https://t.co/cCwrBYV5x3
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888101459614683140
The question is, are you conflating the true, the good, the preferable, and the possible? In the end, all decidability = eugenic vs dysgenic
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 13:51:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888758339827625986
Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888101459614683140
IN REPLY TO:
@AlanLevinovitz
Agreed. So we must fight (gently, kindly, firmly) for the tools and virtues that keep truth from splitting in two. https://t.co/cCwrBYV5x3
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888101459614683140
It is fairly easy to falsify (test) all public speech. The problem is not in the technique. It’s in the loss of cheap deception by all.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 13:47:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888757470050615296
Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz @dweinberger
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888151314567442432
IN REPLY TO:
@AlanLevinovitz
Thought-provoking essay by @dweinberger–made me re-evaluate my own discourse ideals. https://t.co/9E9JBG6Eo7
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888151314567442432
We simply failed until now to produce the same demand for warranty of due diligence in information that we did in services and products.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 13:46:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888757240081125377
Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz @dweinberger
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888151314567442432
IN REPLY TO:
@AlanLevinovitz
Thought-provoking essay by @dweinberger–made me re-evaluate my own discourse ideals. https://t.co/9E9JBG6Eo7
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/888151314567442432
OK ‘means’ adequate, sufficient, good enough, good, that will work, done, stop, next, I am ready, I am fine, I agree. or more directly ‘current context or task is complete, move on to the next’
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-19 18:54:00 UTC