Well, I would say that the difference between epistemology and ontology as it is used, is the difference between truth and meaning.
Ontologies are arbitrary, but epistemology is a product of the hierarchy of constant relations of the universe.
To state it prosecutorially, I would say that epistemology produces a testimonial ontology, and that all other ontologies are merely fictionalisms.
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathem
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathematics – which consists of nothing but constant relations sets is merely the falsification of inconstant relations. Instead, semantics, grammar, and syntax serves to limit relations to sets of constant relations the way lie groups limit causal relations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:04:00 UTC
-
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathem
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathematics – which consists of nothing but constant relations sets is merely the falsification of inconstant relations. Instead, semantics, grammar, and syntax serves to limit relations to sets of constant relations the way lie groups limit causal relations. -
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathem
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathematics – which consists of nothing but constant relations sets is merely the falsification of inconstant relations. Instead, semantics, grammar, and syntax serves to limit relations to sets of constant relations the way lie groups limit causal relations. -
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but nece
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary. -
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but nece
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary. -
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but nece
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:23:00 UTC
-
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible. In language we can engage in all sorts of association by non constant relations. By speaking in actions we speak in constant relations. It has taken me far too long to simplify it down to something that digestible. -
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible. In language we can engage in all sorts of association by non constant relations. By speaking in actions we speak in constant relations. It has taken me far too long to simplify it down to something that digestible. -
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names,
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible.
In language we can engage in all sorts of association by non constant relations.
By speaking in actions we speak in constant relations.
It has taken me far too long to simplify it down to something that digestible.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:21:00 UTC