Um. The secret to anything is little more than the total time spent deeply thinking about it in some measurement or another.
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
Um. The secret to anything is little more than the total time spent deeply think
Um. The secret to anything is little more than the total time spent deeply thinking about it in some measurement or another. -
Um. The secret to anything is little more than the total time spent deeply think
Um. The secret to anything is little more than the total time spent deeply thinking about it in some measurement or another.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-19 11:55:00 UTC
-
The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal gram
The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal grammar’, into the three spectrums of experience, and the physical, ideal, and imaginary dimensions of the universe. I can reduce the physical dimensions to action, and the experiential to combinations of reward systems (prey drive/mate drive), and the imaginary to a combination thereof. That’s just going to take me a long time. Maybe a year at the minimum – unless I’m lucky. But as I’ve tried to argue over the past few weeks I don’t think I need to go to that level in order to make my case. So I guess I have to say that I’m ‘unstuck’ from the grammar problem. And starting yesterday I was able to continue the chapter on vocabulary of epistemology. -
The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal gram
The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal grammar’, into the three spectrums of experience, and the physical, ideal, and imaginary dimensions of the universe. I can reduce the physical dimensions to action, and the experiential to combinations of reward systems (prey drive/mate drive), and the imaginary to a combination thereof. That’s just going to take me a long time. Maybe a year at the minimum – unless I’m lucky. But as I’ve tried to argue over the past few weeks I don’t think I need to go to that level in order to make my case. So I guess I have to say that I’m ‘unstuck’ from the grammar problem. And starting yesterday I was able to continue the chapter on vocabulary of epistemology. -
The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal gram
The principle problem with reorganizing linguistics is deflating ‘universal grammar’, into the three spectrums of experience, and the physical, ideal, and imaginary dimensions of the universe.
I can reduce the physical dimensions to action, and the experiential to combinations of reward systems (prey drive/mate drive), and the imaginary to a combination thereof. That’s just going to take me a long time. Maybe a year at the minimum – unless I’m lucky.
But as I’ve tried to argue over the past few weeks I don’t think I need to go to that level in order to make my case.
So I guess I have to say that I’m ‘unstuck’ from the grammar problem. And starting yesterday I was able to continue the chapter on vocabulary of epistemology.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-18 15:45:00 UTC
-
When you say ‘Pattern’ what do you mean? A set of constant relations
When you say ‘Pattern’ what do you mean? A set of constant relations. -
When you say ‘Pattern’ what do you mean? A set of constant relations
When you say ‘Pattern’ what do you mean? A set of constant relations. -
When you say ‘Pattern’ what do you mean? A set of constant relations
When you say ‘Pattern’ what do you mean?
A set of constant relations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-18 15:15:00 UTC
-
Signal Vs Noise
You know, some of us seek signal and some of us seek noise. And the periodicity determines the difference.