Category: Epistemology and Method

  • Actually I am but my arguments should stand independent of my authorship. I mean

    Actually I am but my arguments should stand independent of my authorship. I mean, otherwise that would be a fallacy of appeal to authority. Right?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:35:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954512580202106880

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954512005255213056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954512005255213056

  • I mean, we can’t confuse the test of constant relations between states (inferenc

    I mean, we can’t confuse the test of constant relations between states (inference) with induction, with truth (consistency, correspondence, existential possibility, and coherence), right? I mean, that would be sophomoric.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:32:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954511993804935168

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954504461858127874


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954504461858127874

  • Hmmm…induction doesn’t exist right? Deduction (axiom), Induction (guessing), a

    Hmmm…induction doesn’t exist right? Deduction (axiom), Induction (guessing), abduction (wild guessing), and guessing (free association.) I mean, only someone of late medieval understanding would even imagine inductive arguments. Instead we’d use science: endlessly contingent.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:31:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954511704544763904

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954504461858127874


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954504461858127874

  • Yes You Can Judge. Everything. And Its Easy

    –‘snide’– I know. I know. But then, those who are capable don’t fear competition, but cherish it, and those who aren’t capable, admonish it. It’s purely logical to disapprove, shame, ridicule, gossip, and rally when on is inferior and fearful of competition. In fact, Good competition is rare. If you disapprove, shame, ridicule, gossip and rally against superiority that’s admission of inferiority. And, yes it is quite simply to judge superiority vs inferiority, as greater time, calories, content, symmetry, and precision – just as fine art is distinguishable from petty – by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – just as all man’s thoughts, displays, words, deeds and achievements are distinguishable and their differences in quality decidable by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein. Just as we, as organic creatures are measurable by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – in genes, body, behavior, and knowledge. And therein lies the difference between criticism of the lack of time, lack of calories, lack of content, lack of symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – and criticism of the judgement of others on the relative presence or lack of time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision. Either one can build himself or herself – or not. Either one can build a craft, skill, or art himself or herself – or not. Either one can build works, tha produce returns – or not. Either one can build a family that produces generations but imposes no costs now or future on others, between himself, and herself – or not. Either one can build a company that produces positive returns – or not. Either one can build a polity that produces positive returns without the need for immigration – or not. Either one can build a nation that produces positive returns without the need for parasitism and conquest – or not. These are facts to those who achieve them, and uncomfortable truths to those that fail, and heinous demands by those who will not try, and oppression by those who prefer parasitism.
  • Um…. I do the science, logic, and natural law in analytic grammar, and I sort

    Um…. I do the science, logic, and natural law in analytic grammar, and I sort of view pretty much ‘pop philosophy’ if not all of philosophy as moral fictionalism. Not that we can’t learn from it. But it’s not interesting to me. I read almost exclusively science. But thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-18 15:41:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954015789442531329

    Reply addressees: @harrison_partch

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954014957376598016


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954014957376598016

  • We Don’t All Have To Speak In Operational Language Any More Than We Need To Speak In Mathematics Or Legalese. But…. &#1

    Lets just say that there are inflationary grammars that assist in conveying meaning at lower cost, and deflationary grammars. And that the challenge is not so much in forcing everyone to use deflationary grammars, is it is, to sue devlationary grammars to eliminate ignorance, error, fraud and deceit from our inflationary grammars. I don’t expect very many people to write in or speak in testimonial, operational, propertarian language because it would be like asking everyone to talk in legalese. The problem is that without deflationary grammars (like math and the other logics, or operationalism and propertarianism) it is very difficult to sanitize inflationary languages that are low cost, of the frauds and deceits that impose high costs on others via overloading. There is no excuse for lies. even comforting lies, if the fictionalism that is a mater of allegorical convenience, produces externalities that are destructive.
  • We Don’t All Have To Speak In Operational Language Any More Than We Need To Speak In Mathematics Or Legalese. But…. &#1

    Lets just say that there are inflationary grammars that assist in conveying meaning at lower cost, and deflationary grammars. And that the challenge is not so much in forcing everyone to use deflationary grammars, is it is, to sue devlationary grammars to eliminate ignorance, error, fraud and deceit from our inflationary grammars. I don’t expect very many people to write in or speak in testimonial, operational, propertarian language because it would be like asking everyone to talk in legalese. The problem is that without deflationary grammars (like math and the other logics, or operationalism and propertarianism) it is very difficult to sanitize inflationary languages that are low cost, of the frauds and deceits that impose high costs on others via overloading. There is no excuse for lies. even comforting lies, if the fictionalism that is a mater of allegorical convenience, produces externalities that are destructive.
  • WE DON’T ALL HAVE TO SPEAK IN OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE ANY MORE THAN WE NEED TO SPEA

    WE DON’T ALL HAVE TO SPEAK IN OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE ANY MORE THAN WE NEED TO SPEAK IN MATHEMATICS OR LEGALESE. BUT….

    Lets just say that there are inflationary grammars that assist in conveying meaning at lower cost, and deflationary grammars. And that the challenge is not so much in forcing everyone to use deflationary grammars, is it is, to sue devlationary grammars to eliminate ignorance, error, fraud and deceit from our inflationary grammars.

    I don’t expect very many people to write in or speak in testimonial, operational, propertarian language because it would be like asking everyone to talk in legalese. The problem is that without deflationary grammars (like math and the other logics, or operationalism and propertarianism) it is very difficult to sanitize inflationary languages that are low cost, of the frauds and deceits that impose high costs on others via overloading.

    There is no excuse for lies. even comforting lies, if the fictionalism that is a mater of allegorical convenience, produces externalities that are destructive.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-17 14:03:00 UTC

  • (e) And that there is a vast difference between consistency correspondence, cohe

    (e) And that there is a vast difference between consistency correspondence, coherence of premises and conclusions(science), than between premises, deductions, and inferences (logic). Find some adult who can handle that discourse. it CAN’T be false.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 13:51:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953263468735549440

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Imperius__13 (d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Imperius__13 (d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200

  • (d) deal with it. Either I was right and all any and all the logics consist of d

    (d) deal with it. Either I was right and all any and all the logics consist of deflationary (limited) grammars (rules) by which we reduce the complexity of constant relations between states, where constant relations are limited to relations of analogies to experience – or not.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 13:48:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953262796111785984

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Imperius__13 (d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Imperius__13 (d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200