Category: Epistemology and Method
-
When Someone Uses The Term “Reductionism” They”re Admitting They Have No Argument.
WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT. —“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “— You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history. Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies? Truth was invented precisely once. Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once. Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty). Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it. The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide) That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it. Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it. Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it. Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy. -
When Someone Uses The Term “Reductionism” They”re Admitting They Have No Argument.
WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT. —“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “— You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history. Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies? Truth was invented precisely once. Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once. Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty). Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it. The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide) That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it. Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it. Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it. Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy. -
WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMEN
WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT.
—“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “—
You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history.
Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies?
Truth was invented precisely once.
Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once.
Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty).
Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it.
The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide)
That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it.
Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it.
Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it.
Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-22 09:56:00 UTC
-
It’s all exposing the process by which a particular snapshot understanding is ac
It’s all exposing the process by which a particular snapshot understanding is achieved along with the trade offs made -
It’s all exposing the process by which a particular snapshot understanding is ac
It’s all exposing the process by which a particular snapshot understanding is achieved along with the trade offs made -
It’s all exposing the process by which a particular snapshot understanding is ac
It’s all exposing the process by which a particular snapshot understanding is achieved along with the trade offs made
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-21 09:44:00 UTC
-
“If you treat your brain like a vestigial organ, you are a beast.”-James Santaga
-“If you treat your brain like a vestigial organ, you are a beast.”-James Santagata
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-19 19:14:00 UTC
-
What Is The Past Participle Of The Word “run”?
It is run. This is one of the few verbs where the infinitive and past participle are the same. The simple past tense is different (ran). Past Participle: run.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-past-participle-of-the-word-run
-
What Is The Past Participle Of The Word “run”?
It is run. This is one of the few verbs where the infinitive and past participle are the same. The simple past tense is different (ran). Past Participle: run.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-past-participle-of-the-word-run
-
“Can you have reason without logic, and language without placeholder/tautology?”
—“Can you have reason without logic, and language without placeholder/tautology?”–Dmitry Chernov We conflate the terms a great deal, but reasoning consists of both wayfinding (via positiva free association ) and what we call ‘logicAL’ operations (via negativa dissassociations) that test constant relations between states. But if we are to avoid conflation, reasoning consists of informal free association and dis-association (dissociation), while the LOGICS consist of formal grammars by which we perform via negativa disassociations by tests (falsifications) of associations (constant relations). A grammar consists of rules (patterns really) of continuous disambiguation. The logics study and catalog subsets of constant relations (dimensions) such as time. When we ask, can we have language without referrents (Names) – well, we are capable of non-liguistic reasoning so yes. And we are capable of sign language. but we must have a grammar in both cases to communicate. And as for ‘natural grammar’ that appears to be nothing more than the same thing neurons do in large numbers: associate and disassociate by a process of continuous disambiguation (category formation) and the recursive differences in state as we ponder it.