Category: Epistemology and Method

  • “The Most Intolerant Wins” (Taleb). Hence extending the demand for warranty of d

    “The Most Intolerant Wins” (Taleb). Hence extending the demand for warranty of due diligence from products and services to INFORMATION. In other words, institutionalize extremely INTOLERANT free speech. It wasn’t possible until now. It’s possible now: Propertarianism. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 17:27:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985570256512012289

  • OMFG. The Libertarians and Right are dominated by coders. Why? Programming opera

    OMFG. The Libertarians and Right are dominated by coders. Why? Programming operationalizes logic – which is too reductio for real world use – to real world phenomenon and rapidly convinces you of the universal overestimation of undrestanding of human minds. It is very hard to be an idealistic programmer. That’s why there aren’t any. Programming is unforgiving. It has zero tolerance for ‘good enough’.

    Evolution needed us to be confident despite our ignorance or die of starvation. That said, we are still confident of despite our ignorance while we die of obesity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 15:56:00 UTC

  • “The Most Intolerant Wins” (Taleb). Hence extending the demand for warranty of d

    “The Most Intolerant Wins” (Taleb). Hence extending the demand for warranty of due diligence from products and services to INFORMATION. In other words, institutionalize extremely INTOLERANT free speech. It wasn’t possible until now. It’s possible now: Propertarianism. #Trump


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 13:27:00 UTC

  • Aggressive Suppression of Falsehoods

    A group specializing in low trust lying, particularly by moral hazard, will defeat a group specializing in high trust truth, for the simple reason that lies and deceits are cheaper to produce than truths, and far more expensive to defend against. So the only solution is the constant aggressive suppression of falsehoods through the only means of doing so: tort.

  • Aggressive Suppression of Falsehoods

    A group specializing in low trust lying, particularly by moral hazard, will defeat a group specializing in high trust truth, for the simple reason that lies and deceits are cheaper to produce than truths, and far more expensive to defend against. So the only solution is the constant aggressive suppression of falsehoods through the only means of doing so: tort.

  • One of (((Their))) techniques is to create moral hazard by appeal to reasonablen

    One of (((Their))) techniques is to create moral hazard by appeal to reasonableness (optimums) versus appeal to criticism (skepticisms). Whenever someone makes an appeal to reasonableness rather than reciprocity or truth then you know they’re engaging in deception by pilpul.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-12 15:43:00 UTC

  • (a) as ability declines demand for intuitionistic fictions increases, and conver

    (a) as ability declines demand for intuitionistic fictions increases, and conversely as ability increases demand for rationally decidable criteria increases. Meaning those of lesser ability require we appeal to intuitions, and those of greater ability require we appeal to reason. This is because those of lower ability have not been sufficiently domesticated (produced agency) by those of greater ability.

    (b) literary analogy using archetypes and archetypal story lines (we can list both archetypes and story lines) can be decomposed into rational terms and tested. Literary analogy allows loading and framing so that individuals can learn by intuition rather than reason (ie: by suggestion). But if we cannot decompose these analogies to scientific statements we do not know if they are false, or harmful or ‘evil’ as abrahamism has been.

    (d) people require a means of calculating (reasoning, thinking) in the broadest sense, and the most simple units of measure are anthropological. In the absence of tribal feedback they need what we call mindfulness but is better thought of a means of selecting and ignoring impulses (some of us call this agency). and in the absence of tribal community and dependence we need festivals and feasts. And to establish the limits we need an oath. All civilizations address this spectrum of mindfulness to oath, to feast, to festival to compensate for the competition produced by production, and the hierarchy that evolves form that division of knowledge, labor, and advocacy involved in the production of private, commercial, and public goods. This is because too few of us are evolved enough to survive without institutions that provide help to our remaining animal intuitions.

    We teach certain skills but what we do not teach is ‘sacredness of the commons’ that churches did, and we do not teach mindfulness or norms in a rational fashion.

    Religion is dying everywhere. ANd it is being replaced with things that are almost as bad. The question is how we provide the necessary services of religions in a manner not constituted by lies that do not decompose in to scientifically testable, and therefore indisputable prose.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-10 15:21:00 UTC

  • Truth is enough. If you need lies, then why do you need lies?

    Truth is enough. If you need lies, then why do you need lies?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 15:39:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983368854654062594

    Reply addressees: @TheAustrian_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983366533186576385


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983366533186576385

  • Very few of us are capable of understanding this, because the desire for closure

    Very few of us are capable of understanding this, because the desire for closure (mathiness) in the pursuit of certainty (justification) is impossible for all but the most confident to tolerate. Taleb says it poorly but “skin in the game” is the only solution to such behaviors.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-09 14:23:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983349680158531585

    Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek @NakedKeynes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983348359485419521


    IN REPLY TO:

    @FriedrichHayek

    @NakedKeynes Hayek is right and you are wrong in pointing out that the “invisible hand” is a causal empirical mechanism which explains an empirical problem, and it is not a definition of “value” nor is it a tautological conceptual construction tied any model of “value”. Arrow blundered here.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983348359485419521

  • 3 – in the ongoing competition with the consequences of fictionalism, “true enou

    3 – in the ongoing competition with the consequences of fictionalism, “true enough” is no longer “good enough”, it is the entirety of the problem. Every discipline must reform just as during the last revolutions. … –Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 16:12:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983014686303178753

    Reply addressees: @PeterBoettke @pavelkuchar @FerlitoCarmelo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983005370657501184


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PeterBoettke

    @curtdoolittle @pavelkuchar @FerlitoCarmelo Austrian economics is much more vibrant and varied within the scientific community that you are recognizing Curt. I believe this is because you are looking at it through a certain window, a window I would argue is the least productive of plausible readings of a tradition.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983005370657501184