Curt Doolittle

Category: Epistemology and Method

  • “How do you verify truth?”— Verification is a method of falsification not a me

    —“How do you verify truth?”—

    Verification is a method of falsification not a means of identifying truth. No matter how many excuses you make (justifications) that does not provide us with confidence of truth.

    Instead….

    You eliminate all falsehoods, and what remains is a truth candidate. You eliminate all falsehoods by attempting to falsify each dimension of actionable reality. And you do so to defend against fictionalisms (lies).

    Identity (categorical consistency)

    Logical (internal consistency)

    Empirical (external correspondence)

    Operational (existential possibility)

    Rational (rational choice)

    Reciprocal (reciprocally rational)

    Complete (scope, limits, and parsimony)

    Coherent (across all these tests)

    Warranty (warranty of having performed these tests).

    If all premises and arguments pass these attempts at falsification one may have a truth candidate. Otherwise one does not.

    This is as certain as the laws of physics, mathematics, and logic.

    It is very hard for a statement to survive these tests, to give that testimony, and to warranty it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 09:53:00 UTC

  • I can find dozens of liars throughout history, and tens of thousands to rewrite

    I can find dozens of liars throughout history, and tens of thousands to rewrite their words, and millions to repeat their words – on any subject. Just as we can find millions of liars today in the postmodern movement, just as we could find millions a few decades ago in the marxist and bolshevik movement. Che was one of the worst people to live in modernity, but his image is used world round as a savior of modernity. Marx caused 100M dead and he is treated as a savior. Mohammed caused 750M deaths at a minimum, destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world, and is the longest threat to prosperity man ever made, yet he is a prophet, his words memorized, his warfare deified. The christians were instrumental in the destruction of the roman empire, and the church in undermining the aristocracy, and empire, and the church responsible for the conversion and submission, and illiteracy of europeans to the point where without the vikings, and the remilitarization of europe to resist them, they would have been too weak to resist the muslims. And today christians and their postmodern descendents are the advocates of bringing in the Hordes among us. By the time we overthrew the church half of the capital in europe was ‘dead’ (static), feeding the parasitic, corrupt, church and her politics. Today the church works daily to undermine western civilization. What separates evangelicals from the church is that they have half-recovered. The history of the church is of appropriation of credit they did not earn, and avoidance of criticism that they did. We nearly escaped her with 19th century romanticism, yet the catholic, half catholic, and orthodox countries destroyed germany, which was the remaining engine of our traditions. That we need a church or temple is one thing. That charity must be personally performed is another. That mindfulness is necessary for the many is yet another, but the cancer upon mankind that is abrahamism must end forever as the most evil lie ever invented.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 08:43:00 UTC

  • I am very, very, good at what I do. I’m sorry if it is hard for you. The truth i

    I am very, very, good at what I do.

    I’m sorry if it is hard for you.

    The truth is enough.

    No more Pilpul.

    No more lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-29 16:31:00 UTC

  • GRAMMARS —“How can grammar be Fictional?”— FIrst, see: Fictionalism (Stanfor

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fictionalism/THE GRAMMARS

    —“How can grammar be Fictional?”—

    FIrst, see: Fictionalism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fictionalism/

    Next, technically speaking Grammar consists of rules of continuous disambiguation.

    You can follow me when I have the class on it becuase it’s some of the most interesting parts of my work

    For example, in temporal logic only so many words make sense.

    So, the grammar of temporal logic includes constraints on vocabulary.

    So when I talk about GRAMMARS I show how each grammatical structure (logic) does in fact limit vocabulary.

    As such if you stack the grammars from most simple to most complex, then vocabulary is a subset of grammar.

    So

    Cognitive ability of the mind

    >>> Grammars

    >>>>> Phonemes

    >>>>>> Vocabularies

    This is what I discovered while working with ‘the grammars’ and it’s one of the reasons I had to do so much work.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 14:59:00 UTC

  • WHAT YOU WILL LEARN Once I’m done teaching you, you’ll understand that aryan rea

    WHAT YOU WILL LEARN

    Once I’m done teaching you, you’ll understand that aryan reason and science produced a series of deflationary grammars by which we iteratively increase our truth tests, while semitic pilpul took that invention and inverted it creating a series of conflationary and inflationary grammars of fictionalism, by which to produce deceptions.

    Armed with this understanding you will have the basis of white sharia: natural law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 13:09:00 UTC

  • PILPUL WAS INVENTED TO REVERSE GREEK REASON. Every civilization of the ancient w

    PILPUL WAS INVENTED TO REVERSE GREEK REASON.

    Every civilization of the ancient world resisted reason.

    Every civilization of the modern world resisted empiricism

    Every civilization of the next era will resist operationalism.

    We must end their invention of lying forever.

    Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, Natural Law of Reciprocity, Market Government, and Nationalism – and the incremental suppression of justificationary pilpul, rationalism, and fictionalisms, such that they can never produce another dark age.

    Propertarianism creates white sharia.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 08:32:00 UTC

  • THEY INVENTED PILPUL BY WHICH TO INVERT THE INNOVATION OF GREEK REASON (TRUTH) I

    THEY INVENTED PILPUL BY WHICH TO INVERT THE INNOVATION OF GREEK REASON (TRUTH) INTO ANTI-REASON (LYING)

    (very important concept)

    You mean the people who gave us the undermining of the empire, and constant intentional insurrection, judaism, christianity, and islam and the resulting Abrahamic dark age and 750M dead, and who specialized in slaving, tax predation, and usury, did nothing at all for humanity despite being the most literate group in europe, when freed from ostracization gave us communism, the soviet secret police, the gulag, and 100M dead, the pseudosciences of marx, boas, freud, cantor, mises; gave us the distraction of rothbardian libertarianism, and the tragedy of trotsky-neoconservatism in america; and who invaded american academic institutions using the Frankfurt School out of Columbia; and who were instrumental in systematically undermining the constitution by financing specific cases that would force judicial activism, and who were the advocates and sponsors of the immigration act that accomplished through third world migration what their ideas could not: the second conquest of european civilization – this time through pseudoscientific propaganda, instead of supernatural propaganda; and today are the vastly disproportionate propagandists in globalism by which the multicultural low trust tribalism of the levant is spread to the homogenous high trust peoples of the west? Make no mistake about it. We are all responsible for bad things, but they are responsible for more deaths, dark ages, and destruction than all peoples and all natural events except for the great plagues and diseases. And the reason is simple: they invented Pilpul (abrahamism): the counter-to reason. In other words, they took the innovation of the greeks (idealism) and created it’s opposite (pilpul) by which to overload, load, frame, suggest, and obscure human reason.

    So no. No people has done more harm to humanity in all of human history.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-28 08:29:00 UTC

  • —“You’re Misguided”—

    I think you’ll at least understand my restatement of history, once you understand deflationary and critical vs inflationary, conflationary, and fictional grammars. I am tracking the technologies of truth and deception, and group evolutionary strategy using those grammars, just as you would track the history of linguistics, genes, pottery, or metallurgy. I track economics not literature. I understand that man seizes opportunities then justifies them. I understand the desire for literature in some classes and results in other classes throughout history. And once you have these understandings, you also attribute very different values and incentives to historical events, just as knowledge of science forced us to rewrite our understanding and history. Now, you might say I err, but do I err, but it’s extremely unlikely that I err. Because we need do nothing more than study the economics (incentives), and grammars (excuses) to determine whether people acted morally in fact, or immorally, casting themselves as moral. I am not misguided. My understanding of history is very clearly, the initiation of indo europeans, and the socially destabilizing counter-revolutions against their innovations, because meritocracy, reciprocity, sovereignty, and markets are a threat to every single old order. The problem that you’ll face is providing superior explanatory power with greater parsimony, without appealing to knowledge that can’t exist in time and space. You don’t know that (yet). but that’s what you’re dealing with. Cheers

  • —“You’re Misguided”—

    I think you’ll at least understand my restatement of history, once you understand deflationary and critical vs inflationary, conflationary, and fictional grammars. I am tracking the technologies of truth and deception, and group evolutionary strategy using those grammars, just as you would track the history of linguistics, genes, pottery, or metallurgy. I track economics not literature. I understand that man seizes opportunities then justifies them. I understand the desire for literature in some classes and results in other classes throughout history. And once you have these understandings, you also attribute very different values and incentives to historical events, just as knowledge of science forced us to rewrite our understanding and history. Now, you might say I err, but do I err, but it’s extremely unlikely that I err. Because we need do nothing more than study the economics (incentives), and grammars (excuses) to determine whether people acted morally in fact, or immorally, casting themselves as moral. I am not misguided. My understanding of history is very clearly, the initiation of indo europeans, and the socially destabilizing counter-revolutions against their innovations, because meritocracy, reciprocity, sovereignty, and markets are a threat to every single old order. The problem that you’ll face is providing superior explanatory power with greater parsimony, without appealing to knowledge that can’t exist in time and space. You don’t know that (yet). but that’s what you’re dealing with. Cheers

  • There isn’t any shortcut.

    THERE ISN’T ANY SHORTCUT TO WISDOM There isn’t any shortcut. You are either going to read enough basic history, and then learn the operational deconstruction of incentives from me, or you aren’t. There isn’t any shortcut. There isn’t one book. There is however a series of books that are the minimum you’ll need. But that’s not easy. My book will teach you the science and logic of natural law, and all that it entails. But it will simply explain how to make all the knowledge of all the disciplines, commensurable – into a single universal language. That said, history provides the storytelling. And it’s the stories we remember. Stories serve as search algorithms. Logic serves as recipes.Science insures we don’t err. We have had enough of us working to gether now that very smart people with a scientific education and knowledge of computer science, and a bit of history can grasp the ideas within a year. For most people it takes two to understand, and another one or two to master the use of. Which is like any other STEM discipline.  ‘Cause it’s like any other STEM discipline….. —“You’ve made a comment elsewhere which I’ll try to paraphrase. Once you get the importance to operationalism, obstacles to demonstrated intelligence are removed. From there, the way forward is just by acquiring more knowledge. There is no way around it. If you don’t have the data (information), operational arguments amount to well articulated opinions and nothing more.”— Bill Joslin