Category: Epistemology and Method

  • It doesn’t require belief, that’s what you’re stuck on. It requires only that I

    It doesn’t require belief, that’s what you’re stuck on. It requires only that I increasingly expand my ability to take actions, that perform transformations. I don’t hold ‘beliefs’. I merely falsify everything, retain what survives, and continue building possible actions.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 20:31:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/995038755319926784

    Reply addressees: @Noblesm85

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994980601752117248


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Noblesm85

    @curtdoolittle 1) Induction is not our only method of understanding existence; we also have deduction and abduction.

    2) I confused nothing. Your empiricism requires the belief that you can understand the universe, ie, the rational intelligibility of the universe.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994980601752117248

  • It’s action based, not faith based. You’re confusing scripture and textualism wi

    It’s action based, not faith based. You’re confusing scripture and textualism with engineering and empiricism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-11 16:16:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994974484858855429

    Reply addressees: @Noblesm85

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994735553424822277


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Noblesm85

    @curtdoolittle Two things many scientists don’t seem very concerned about:

    1) Claiming to understand the universe, or even a part of it, is faith-based.

    2) Past occurrences are not predictors of future ones.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994735553424822277

  • The only possible closure is categorical, internal, external, operational, consi

    The only possible closure is categorical, internal, external, operational, consistency and coherence, including limits, parsimony and full accounting – meaning falsification against reality. Argumentative rationalism isn’t closed. Hence why it’s the hide of sophists and theology.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-10 20:33:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994676771349032961

    Reply addressees: @Noblesm85

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994665016854040576


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Noblesm85

    @curtdoolittle The scientific method and falsification are also reliant upon constructivist rationality- which is the product of consensus (irrational) thought- and furthermore, is predicated on the axiom that one can, or ever will, be able to understand the universe.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994665016854040576

  • 1) No they are not The scientific method says only that operational construction

    1) No they are not The scientific method says only that operational construction (existential possibility) and logical construction (internal consistency) and external correspondence (empirical observable evidence), limits, parsimony and full accounting must survive.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-10 20:29:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994675918969933824

    Reply addressees: @Noblesm85

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994665016854040576


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Noblesm85

    @curtdoolittle The scientific method and falsification are also reliant upon constructivist rationality- which is the product of consensus (irrational) thought- and furthermore, is predicated on the axiom that one can, or ever will, be able to understand the universe.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994665016854040576

  • If you cannot make a statement in social science using economic terms, then eith

    If you cannot make a statement in social science using economic terms, then either you don’t know what you’re talking about, or you are engaged in selection bias, or worse, deception. Hence the rise of “Economic Imperialism” in the Academy as a counter to social pseudoscience..


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-10 14:34:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994586462803906560

    Reply addressees: @KennethBuff @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994585863207182336


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KennethBuff @sapinker The NYT article conveys is that it is that virtue signaling is a form of conspicuous consumption that one forces others to pay the indirect cost of.
    Or stated directly: we are burning the most valuable form of capital in the world (homogeneity and high trust) for virtue signals.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/994585863207182336


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @KennethBuff @sapinker The NYT article conveys is that it is that virtue signaling is a form of conspicuous consumption that one forces others to pay the indirect cost of.
    Or stated directly: we are burning the most valuable form of capital in the world (homogeneity and high trust) for virtue signals.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/994585863207182336

  • Any time we state an incomplete premise we feed discord by supplying bias confir

    Any time we state an incomplete premise we feed discord by supplying bias confirmation by doing the cherry picking for them. He stated an incomplete premise in order to feed the confirmation bias of a majority faction – not the Truth. (“The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth”)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-10 14:29:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994585245491040257

    Reply addressees: @KennethBuff @sapinker

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994584823061721089


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KennethBuff @sapinker People vote POWER given the CONDITIONS of competition. That’s why Democracy works for selecting priorities in a homogenous polity but not choosing differences in a heterogeneous polity, and why there is so much friction between American ‘tribes’.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/994584823061721089


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @KennethBuff @sapinker People vote POWER given the CONDITIONS of competition. That’s why Democracy works for selecting priorities in a homogenous polity but not choosing differences in a heterogeneous polity, and why there is so much friction between American ‘tribes’.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/994584823061721089

  • Philosophy for Grownups

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/03/19/philosophy-for-grown-ups/
    PHILOSOPHY FOR GROWNUPS (repost) 1. The only truths we know for certain are falsehoods. Everything that is not false is a truth candidate. This is the inverse of the fallacy of justificationism and the central insight of the sciences: the means by which we invent or grasp an idea contribute nothing to whether or not it is true or false. Only exhaustive falsification and survival from criticism deliver confidence that actions produce anticipated outcomes due to our comprehension of cause, effect, and the operations that are possible. Otherwise we are forever justifying whatever it is we seek to justify by any set of excuses we can imagine. This is why astrology, numerology, theology, philosophy, and the pseudosciences are so common – justification means absolutely nothing. 2. The only preference we know is the one we demonstrate. The only good we know is the one we mutually demonstrate by acting upon. People report very differently from what they demonstrate. The only morality we know that is we must avoid criminal(material), ethical(direct), and moral (indirect) imposition of costs upon one another. The only moral actions then are those that are not criminal, unethical, and immoral, and that means the only moral actions consiste of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality. Ergo, all moral actions are those that are not immoral. There is no recipe for moral action other than that which is not immoral. 3. People always and everywhere demonstrate that they are neither moral or immoral but amoral and rational, doing what they must in all circumstances that they exist in. it is just disproportionately advantageous to act morally for the simple reason that the returns of cooperation always and everywhere defeat the returns on individual action. This is why exhaustive forgiveness of ‘cheaters’ in all walks of life will generally reform them. Because it is in their self interest. This is why we demonstrate altruistic punishment also (high cost of punishing cheaters), because the returns on cooperation are so valuable that we evolved to pay the high cost of punishment in order to preserve the high value of cooperation. 4. People notoriously think they are right and in the right, and acting morally, which is why we have courts of one kind or another among all peoples at all stages of development. And while rules of decidability in courts in matters of conflict vary from the poor and underdeveloped where interests in things, kin, and relationships are rare and collectively owned, to the wealthy and developed where things, interests, kin, relationships, and contracts are universally allocated to individuals and individually owned, the means of decidability in every single civilization is RECIPROCITY. 5. There exist then only one negative moral rule and one universal test of morality: “Do not unto others as they would not have done unto them”. There is only one positive moral rule: the extension of trust to non kin that we extend to kin, until it is no longer empirically possible to trust. – this optimizes cooperation by continuously training malcontents that it is in their interest to cooperate, and ostracizes (punishes) those who do not. 6. There are no conflicts that are not decidable by tests of reciprocity. None. This is why all international law is limited exclusively to the test of reciprocity. So logically(rational choice) and empirically (demonstrated action), and universally (all laws domestica and international at all scales) morality is anything that is not immoral unethical or criminal in that it imposes costs upon the efforts already expended to obtain a non-conflicting interest, in a good, relationship, or opportunity. As far as I know no argument can defeat this that is not in and of itself an attempt at reciprocity (theft, freeriding, parasitism, conspiracy). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • Philosophy for Grownups

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/03/19/philosophy-for-grown-ups/
    PHILOSOPHY FOR GROWNUPS (repost) 1. The only truths we know for certain are falsehoods. Everything that is not false is a truth candidate. This is the inverse of the fallacy of justificationism and the central insight of the sciences: the means by which we invent or grasp an idea contribute nothing to whether or not it is true or false. Only exhaustive falsification and survival from criticism deliver confidence that actions produce anticipated outcomes due to our comprehension of cause, effect, and the operations that are possible. Otherwise we are forever justifying whatever it is we seek to justify by any set of excuses we can imagine. This is why astrology, numerology, theology, philosophy, and the pseudosciences are so common – justification means absolutely nothing. 2. The only preference we know is the one we demonstrate. The only good we know is the one we mutually demonstrate by acting upon. People report very differently from what they demonstrate. The only morality we know that is we must avoid criminal(material), ethical(direct), and moral (indirect) imposition of costs upon one another. The only moral actions then are those that are not criminal, unethical, and immoral, and that means the only moral actions consiste of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality. Ergo, all moral actions are those that are not immoral. There is no recipe for moral action other than that which is not immoral. 3. People always and everywhere demonstrate that they are neither moral or immoral but amoral and rational, doing what they must in all circumstances that they exist in. it is just disproportionately advantageous to act morally for the simple reason that the returns of cooperation always and everywhere defeat the returns on individual action. This is why exhaustive forgiveness of ‘cheaters’ in all walks of life will generally reform them. Because it is in their self interest. This is why we demonstrate altruistic punishment also (high cost of punishing cheaters), because the returns on cooperation are so valuable that we evolved to pay the high cost of punishment in order to preserve the high value of cooperation. 4. People notoriously think they are right and in the right, and acting morally, which is why we have courts of one kind or another among all peoples at all stages of development. And while rules of decidability in courts in matters of conflict vary from the poor and underdeveloped where interests in things, kin, and relationships are rare and collectively owned, to the wealthy and developed where things, interests, kin, relationships, and contracts are universally allocated to individuals and individually owned, the means of decidability in every single civilization is RECIPROCITY. 5. There exist then only one negative moral rule and one universal test of morality: “Do not unto others as they would not have done unto them”. There is only one positive moral rule: the extension of trust to non kin that we extend to kin, until it is no longer empirically possible to trust. – this optimizes cooperation by continuously training malcontents that it is in their interest to cooperate, and ostracizes (punishes) those who do not. 6. There are no conflicts that are not decidable by tests of reciprocity. None. This is why all international law is limited exclusively to the test of reciprocity. So logically(rational choice) and empirically (demonstrated action), and universally (all laws domestica and international at all scales) morality is anything that is not immoral unethical or criminal in that it imposes costs upon the efforts already expended to obtain a non-conflicting interest, in a good, relationship, or opportunity. As far as I know no argument can defeat this that is not in and of itself an attempt at reciprocity (theft, freeriding, parasitism, conspiracy). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • FOR GROWNUPS (repost) 1. The only truths we know for certain are falsehoods. Eve

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/19/philosophy-for-grown-ups/PHILOSOPHY FOR GROWNUPS

    (repost)

    1. The only truths we know for certain are falsehoods. Everything that is not false is a truth candidate. This is the inverse of the fallacy of justificationism and the central insight of the sciences: the means by which we invent or grasp an idea contribute nothing to whether or not it is true or false. Only exhaustive falsification and survival from criticism deliver confidence that actions produce anticipated outcomes due to our comprehension of cause, effect, and the operations that are possible. Otherwise we are forever justifying whatever it is we seek to justify by any set of excuses we can imagine. This is why astrology, numerology, theology, philosophy, and the pseudosciences are so common – justification means absolutely nothing.

    2. The only preference we know is the one we demonstrate. The only good we know is the one we mutually demonstrate by acting upon. People report very differently from what they demonstrate. The only morality we know that is we must avoid criminal(material), ethical(direct), and moral (indirect) imposition of costs upon one another. The only moral actions then are those that are not criminal, unethical, and immoral, and that means the only moral actions consiste of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality. Ergo, all moral actions are those that are not immoral. There is no recipe for moral action other than that which is not immoral.

    3. People always and everywhere demonstrate that they are neither moral or immoral but amoral and rational, doing what they must in all circumstances that they exist in. it is just disproportionately advantageous to act morally for the simple reason that the returns of cooperation always and everywhere defeat the returns on individual action. This is why exhaustive forgiveness of ‘cheaters’ in all walks of life will generally reform them. Because it is in their self interest. This is why we demonstrate altruistic punishment also (high cost of punishing cheaters), because the returns on cooperation are so valuable that we evolved to pay the high cost of punishment in order to preserve the high value of cooperation.

    4. People notoriously think they are right and in the right, and acting morally, which is why we have courts of one kind or another among all peoples at all stages of development. And while rules of decidability in courts in matters of conflict vary from the poor and underdeveloped where interests in things, kin, and relationships are rare and collectively owned, to the wealthy and developed where things, interests, kin, relationships, and contracts are universally allocated to individuals and individually owned, the means of decidability in every single civilization is RECIPROCITY.

    5. There exist then only one negative moral rule and one universal test of morality: “Do not unto others as they would not have done unto them”. There is only one positive moral rule: the extension of trust to non kin that we extend to kin, until it is no longer empirically possible to trust. – this optimizes cooperation by continuously training malcontents that it is in their interest to cooperate, and ostracizes (punishes) those who do not.

    6. There are no conflicts that are not decidable by tests of reciprocity. None. This is why all international law is limited exclusively to the test of reciprocity. So logically(rational choice) and empirically (demonstrated action), and universally (all laws domestica and international at all scales) morality is anything that is not immoral unethical or criminal in that it imposes costs upon the efforts already expended to obtain a non-conflicting interest, in a good, relationship, or opportunity.

    As far as I know no argument can defeat this that is not in and of itself an attempt at reciprocity (theft, freeriding, parasitism, conspiracy).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 21:22:00 UTC

  • In the battles of sophisms the articulate wins. that’s the problem

    In the battles of sophisms the articulate wins. that’s the problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 18:43:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/994286751287054336