Category: Epistemology and Method

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PHILOSOPHY? 1) To deve

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PHILOSOPHY?

    1) To develop mental fitness and distance from our impulses (to develop agency)
    2) To accumulate an inventory of human errors and bias so that we do not make them in our own lives, and are not affected by others who employ them.
    3) To survey the sets of myths and paradigms (stories we tell ourselves) such that we can choose goals in our lives.
    4) (the bad part) to find a verbal means of achieving some degree of the mindfulness that is trainable through religion(mythology), ritual (prayer or repetitious action), and self authoring (stoicism – a ritual), and meditation (a ritual in and of itself). Mindfuless serves as a sedative for animal impulse, without the soporific affect of chemicals
    that interfere with processing in general..

    As far as I know that is the end of philosophy. The rest is just left to religion(nonsense/lies) or science (decidability/truth).

    Nearly all of the corpus of philosophy is reducible to fantasy moral literature (french), or fantasy psychological Literature (german), fantasy pseudoscientific literature (ashkenazi), or the attempt to develop scientific versions of those fields (english, American.)

    The problem with science, law proper, and truth proper is that in matters of the personal and social we are not ambivalent neutral surveyors of the material – but seek only personal and group advantage in whatever we can filter from it to advance our interests.

    Yet science and truth are uncomfortable and dehumanizing.

    So to no small degree, philosophy is PRACTICED as the pseudoscience and pseudo-rationalism of finding excuses that comfort us given our genetic, social, economic, cultural, and temporal conditions without relying on the demands easily falsified and supernatural faith.

    In other words, like religion, it’s therapeutic self medication – sedation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 19:02:31 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. MY SIMPLE METHODOLOGY: LOCKER ROOM VS PORCH I

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    MY SIMPLE METHODOLOGY: LOCKER ROOM VS PORCH

    I have a very simple methodology: the truth. the truth provides decidability. And I don’t leave room for pragmatism. By allowing one pragmatic falsehood you allow all pragmatic falsehoods. By disallowing all falsehoods, no matter how practical, you leave only the truth.

    —“I get that you teach by a startling statement and follow-up Devil’s advocate questions. But sometime we lose the forest for trying to define a tree.”—Anne Summers

    It’s just the socratic method. Propose an assertion that will either reinforce or oppose a norm. Then we all debate until we understand.

    I love teaching online. It’s just more like teaching in a Locker Room or Bar than the vaulted porch of athenian wisdom….. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 18:43:37 UTC

  • I have a framework called testimony: internally consistent, externally correspon

    I have a framework called testimony: internally consistent, externally correspondent, operationally describable, rational of choice, reciprocal of rational choice, limited, fully accounted, and parsimonious. As far as I know that is ever dimension of perception available to man.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:54:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017452150996299777

    Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017383367388561408


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017383367388561408

  • I’m happy if you want to discuss which dependency is first: what it is we can sa

    I’m happy if you want to discuss which dependency is first: what it is we can say we speak of and what it is we claim exists using our speech. 😉 In case you don’t grok that, it inverts your presupposition. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:52:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017451652088061953

    Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017394341617324032


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017394341617324032

  • No I’m saying truth is parsimonious and knowledge (wisdom) and truth (parsimony)

    No I’m saying truth is parsimonious and knowledge (wisdom) and truth (parsimony) are different things. How we cast the term ‘knowledge’ as ‘truthful’ or not requires agreement on terms,


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:51:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017451359464017921

    Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017393358795431937


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017393358795431937

  • WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PHILOSOPHY? 1) To develop mental fitness and distance fro

    WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PHILOSOPHY?

    1) To develop mental fitness and distance from our impulses (to develop agency)

    2) To accumulate an inventory of human errors and bias so that we do not make them in our own lives, and are not affected by others who employ them.

    3) To survey the sets of myths and paradigms (stories we tell ourselves) such that we can choose goals in our lives.

    4) (the bad part) to find a verbal means of achieving some degree of the mindfulness that is trainable through religion(mythology), ritual (prayer or repetitious action), and self authoring (stoicism – a ritual), and meditation (a ritual in and of itself). Mindfuless serves as a sedative for animal impulse, without the soporific affect of chemicals

    that interfere with processing in general..

    As far as I know that is the end of philosophy. The rest is just left to religion(nonsense/lies) or science (decidability/truth).

    Nearly all of the corpus of philosophy is reducible to fantasy moral literature (french), or fantasy psychological Literature (german), fantasy pseudoscientific literature (ashkenazi), or the attempt to develop scientific versions of those fields (english, American.)

    The problem with science, law proper, and truth proper is that in matters of the personal and social we are not ambivalent neutral surveyors of the material – but seek only personal and group advantage in whatever we can filter from it to advance our interests.

    Yet science and truth are uncomfortable and dehumanizing.

    So to no small degree, philosophy is PRACTICED as the pseudoscience and pseudo-rationalism of finding excuses that comfort us given our genetic, social, economic, cultural, and temporal conditions without relying on the demands easily falsified and supernatural faith.

    In other words, like religion, it’s therapeutic self medication – sedation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 15:02:00 UTC

  • MY SIMPLE METHODOLOGY: LOCKER ROOM VS PORCH I have a very simple methodology: th

    MY SIMPLE METHODOLOGY: LOCKER ROOM VS PORCH

    I have a very simple methodology: the truth. the truth provides decidability. And I don’t leave room for pragmatism. By allowing one pragmatic falsehood you allow all pragmatic falsehoods. By disallowing all falsehoods, no matter how practical, you leave only the truth.

    —“I get that you teach by a startling statement and follow-up Devil’s advocate questions. But sometime we lose the forest for trying to define a tree.”—Anne Summers

    It’s just the socratic method. Propose an assertion that will either reinforce or oppose a norm. Then we all debate until we understand.

    I love teaching online. It’s just more like teaching in a Locker Room or Bar than the vaulted porch of athenian wisdom….. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 14:43:00 UTC

  • A SYLLOGISM SUBJECTS A STATEMENT TO MARKET COMPETITION

    A SYLLOGISM SUBJECTS A STATEMENT TO MARKET COMPETITION


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 14:37:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017417751512666112

  • ARISTOTLE’S TESTIMONIALISM —“Following Plato’s death, Aristotle immersed himse

    ARISTOTLE’S TESTIMONIALISM

    —“Following Plato’s death, Aristotle immersed himself in empirical studies and shifted from Platonism to empiricism. He believed all concepts and knowledge were ultimately based on perception.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 14:36:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017417528891592705

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. ARISTOTLE’S TESTIMONIALISM —“Following Plat

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    ARISTOTLE’S TESTIMONIALISM

    —“Following Plato’s death, Aristotle immersed himself in empirical studies and shifted from Platonism to empiricism. He believed all concepts and knowledge were ultimately based on perception.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 14:36:45 UTC