(term of the day)
“The fallacy of vividness”
“The fallacy of misleading vividness”
Meaning that the experience is a constituent part of the narration.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-02 21:43:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025134923219460098
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(term of the day)
“The fallacy of vividness”
“The fallacy of misleading vividness”
Meaning that the experience is a constituent part of the narration.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-02 21:42:57 UTC
(term of the day)
“The fallacy of vividness”
“The fallacy of misleading vividness”
Meaning that the experience is a constituent part of the narration.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-02 17:42:00 UTC
Kindly Reminder. This is a No Meme zone.
I delete memes and images and music as substitutes for argument. I teach argument. I teach natural law. There are other places to communicate via imagery. This is the one place where I (we) require words. Of course, i make rare exceptions for meme-ing me or putting arguments on art.
And yes, I’ve been doing this for the past few years. And yes people have complained for years. I curate my feed. And no I don’t care what you think. 😉
lol
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-02 08:32:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(inspired from elsewhere)
Since I’m an Operationalist I only consider operational ideas as more than fantasy, and therefore worthy of thinking about. Fantasy is just daydreaming. And sure, I agree with our collective fantasies. The question is, how would we bring about such fantasies as an outcast minority?
We cannot work with wanting people to believe in our fantasies and possessing our values *we have nothing to sell the feminine males and the feminine underclasses*. Aristocracy (meritocracy) does not sell it rules. It must. Property rights, meritocracy, markets, voluntary exchange, and truth to power are undesirable for the majority. If we cannot convince or sell them, the only thing left then is buying them off or violence, or both.
So I am only concerned with how to buy them off, or how to use violence, since what we do once we get there is not a matter of dispute. We all agree. Agreement isn’t necessary. A plan of action is.
I don’t care about what you’d like. We all share the same reproductive interests and therefore wants of our subspecies. And we have the opportunity to speciate. If we speciate we will outperform all the other just as we have in the past.
All that matters is getting to that point. And as far as I know there is no other means than revolution.
-hugs
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 22:46:45 UTC
https://www.quora.com/How-can-the-study-of-epistemology-help-us-recognize-and-make-sense-of-fake-news/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=a3ee0ae0&srid=u4Qvhttps://www.quora.com/How-can-the-study-of-epistemology-help-us-recognize-and-make-sense-of-fake-news/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=a3ee0ae0&srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 21:51:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 21:51:00 UTC
(inspired from elsewhere)
Since I’m an Operationalist I only consider operational ideas as more than fantasy, and therefore worthy of thinking about. Fantasy is just daydreaming. And sure, I agree with our collective fantasies. The question is, how would we bring about such fantasies as an outcast minority?
We cannot work with wanting people to believe in our fantasies and possessing our values *we have nothing to sell the feminine males and the feminine underclasses*. Aristocracy (meritocracy) does not sell it rules. It must. Property rights, meritocracy, markets, voluntary exchange, and truth to power are undesirable for the majority. If we cannot convince or sell them, the only thing left then is buying them off or violence, or both.
So I am only concerned with how to buy them off, or how to use violence, since what we do once we get there is not a matter of dispute. We all agree. Agreement isn’t necessary. A plan of action is.
I don’t care about what you’d like. We all share the same reproductive interests and therefore wants of our subspecies. And we have the opportunity to speciate. If we speciate we will outperform all the other just as we have in the past.
All that matters is getting to that point. And as far as I know there is no other means than revolution.
-hugs
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 18:46:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(Thinking)
Do we operationally agree with ourselves? In other words, in that moment where you think you have found an idea, answer, decision, or plan, how does that differ from when you listen to and then you agree with someone else? I am not sure it does. I think those two sensation and operations are the same.
(Bill Joslin)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 21:11:40 UTC
(Thinking)
Do we operationally agree with ourselves? In other words, in that moment where you think you have found an idea, answer, decision, or plan, how does that differ from when you listen to and then you agree with someone else? I am not sure it does. I think those two sensation and operations are the same.
(Bill Joslin)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 17:11:00 UTC