Curt Doolittle

Category: Epistemology and Method

  • The Existential Frame

    October 11th, 2018 10:42 AM THE EXISTENTIAL FRAME by Bill Joslin The existential frame (operations) remains constant (unmolested) across both linguistic (cognition) and experiential (sensory) domains. And any other frame, like rose color glasses, blinders or eye patches; twists, limits, or colors the experiential via the linguistic. (That’s what frames do). Subject – that which acts upon an object. Object – that which receives influence by a subject. Subjective truth – truth being the object upon which a frame has influenced. Objective truth – truth which remains untainted Operationalism and the tenets of Testimonialism work to prevent speakers from raping the truth.

  • All Speech Is Measurement,

    October 11th, 2018 6:52 AM ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT? You know, the material universe seemed complicated until we discovered the atomic structure and created the periodic table of the elements. The same is true for the Grammars. Once you understand the grammars, all speech is as open to inspection and comprehension on its structure alone. Once you understand that we can produce only one parsimonious consistent and correspondent frame: operations, that provides universal commensurability, you understand why all frames like all theories, like stories, are weak analogies, self delusions, or frauds. There is only one ‘way of thinking’ (frame) that consists of truth, and an infinite number of frames that are weak, delusional or fraudulent. Why? because we evolved to negotiate, not to speak the truth. We must learn to speak the truth as a means of calculation, just as we must learn to calculate using every OTHER method of calculation. This is why postmodernism and every other disciplinary, cult, ideological, and private vocabulary is just fraud at some degree of scale.

  • Um. Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, Lao Tzu,Abraham. That order is meanin

    Um. Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, Lao Tzu,Abraham.

    That order is meaningful. What grammars does each depend upon?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 10:58:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050339755806912512

  • THE EXISTENTIAL FRAME by Bill Joslin The existential frame (operations) remains

    THE EXISTENTIAL FRAME

    by Bill Joslin

    The existential frame (operations) remains constant (unmolested) across both linguistic (cognition) and experiential (sensory) domains. And any other frame, like rose color glasses, blinders or eye patches; twists, limits, or colors the experiential via the linguistic. (That’s what frames do).

    Subject – that which acts upon an object.

    Object – that which receives influence by a subject.

    Subjective truth – truth being the object upon which a frame has influenced.

    Objective truth – truth which remains untainted

    Operationalism and the tenets of Testimonialism work to prevent speakers from raping the truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 10:42:00 UTC

  • Um. Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, Lao Tzu,Abraham. That order is meanin

    Um. Aristotle, Confucius, Plato, Socrates, Lao Tzu,Abraham.

    That order is meaningful. What grammars does each depend upon?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 06:57:00 UTC

  • ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT?

    ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT?

    You know, the material universe seemed complicated until we discovered the atomic structure and created the periodic table of the elements.

    The same is true for the Grammars. Once you understand the grammars, all speech is as open to inspection and comprehension on its structure alone.

    Once you understand that we can produce only one parsimonious consistent and correspondent frame: operations, that provides universal commensurability, you understand why all frames like all theories, like stories, are weak analogies, self delusions, or frauds.

    There is only one ‘way of thinking’ (frame) that consists of truth, and an infinite number of frames that are weak, delusional or fraudulent.

    Why? because we evolved to negotiate, not to speak the truth. We must learn to speak the truth as a means of calculation, just as we must learn to calculate using every OTHER method of calculation.

    This is why postmodernism and every other disciplinary, cult, ideological, and private vocabulary is just fraud at some degree of scale.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 06:52:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/43704647_302602970336600_50267905316

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/43704647_302602970336600_50267905316

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/43704647_302602970336600_5026790531661824000_o_302602967003267.jpg A TRUTH YOU WON’T LIKE – BUT THE TRUTH IS OUR JOB.A TRUTH YOU WON’T LIKE – BUT THE TRUTH IS OUR JOB.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 20:02:00 UTC

  • 6) This form of argument like mathematics, logic, writing, language or any other

    6) This form of argument like mathematics, logic, writing, language or any other technology, is traceable throughout history as the incremental evolution of a technique of deception. It is used to produce natural neurochemical (opiate) responses and functions as an addiction.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 15:11:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050041138382589952

    Reply addressees: @weltmord

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984

    IN REPLY TO:

    @weltmord

    @curtdoolittle None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions.

    THE DOOLITTLE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HE IS WRITING HIMSELF INTO NOT EVEN A SHALLOW BUT UNSUBSTANTIAL CRITIQUE OF RELIGION

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984

  • 2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chine

    2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chinese) theological(Semitic), or literary(Indian), relies on criteria of decidability and method of argument in support those criteria.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 15:02:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050038971869396992

    Reply addressees: @weltmord

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984

    IN REPLY TO:

    @weltmord

    @curtdoolittle None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions.

    THE DOOLITTLE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HE IS WRITING HIMSELF INTO NOT EVEN A SHALLOW BUT UNSUBSTANTIAL CRITIQUE OF RELIGION

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984

  • “Could we come up with a better term than “tribalism” please?”— Marginal Revol

    —“Could we come up with a better term than “tribalism” please?”— Marginal Revolution

    <Critical Rant=ON>

    OMG…..

    How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience?

    The world doesn’t need more sophisms.

    |PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction.

    –versus–

    |HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION.

    Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS.

    I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia.

    Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle.

    And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction.

    Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd.

    Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.

    <Critical Rant=Off/>

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 09:50:00 UTC