(FB 1541535709 Timestamp) CLOSING THE PATHWAY FOR THEIR LIES —“Wherever there’s a pathway left to be explored, there is also an incentive/evolutionary pressure (same thing, really) to do so. Our goal is to close this particular pathway because it doesn’t benefit us and, for that matter, mankind as a whole.”—Martin Å tÄpán
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
Truth hardens the heart. Odthin
Truth hardens the heart.
Odthin.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 14:40:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059455310178537472
-
“( We already knew Kavanaugh accusers were ‘making it up’, Curt )”– Jim Carlson
—“( We already knew Kavanaugh accusers were ‘making it up’, Curt )”– Jim Carlson
You “knew”, I “suspected”, but waited (remained undecided) for the evidence. That is what separates the Jury from the Judge: and why we have both. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 11:36:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059409012817625088
-
Truth hardens the heart. Odthin
Truth hardens the heart.
Odthin.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 09:39:00 UTC
-
THE END RESULT. You see, I started at the very lowest possible level, and elimin
THE END RESULT.
You see, I started at the very lowest possible level, and eliminated falsehood at every single incremental stage of complexity, and ended up with aesthetics religion and education last.
It produces a single coherent, consistent, correspondent, existential, complete, system of thought from the subatomic world to the rational, calculative, and computational – and from Metaphysics, to Epistemology, to Psychology, to Ethics, to Sociology, to the Law, to Politics, to Group Strategy, to religion education and aesthetics.
What narrative one produces to ‘teach’ unders that system of thought is constrained only by the same rules.
Everyone wants the easy way out, which is to just ‘imagine’ from the top down.
Truth is enough. The Natural Law is enough. A small number of revolutionaries are enough to impose the Law, that forces Truth, that causes the chain of consequences, that results in ethnocentrism, nationalism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, markets in everything, and transcendence of our people – and all others if they do the same – into the gods we imagine.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 09:20:00 UTC
-
WHY? VIA POSITIVA IDEAL, AND VIA NEGATIVA REAL —“Can’t think of a better defin
WHY? VIA POSITIVA IDEAL, AND VIA NEGATIVA REAL
—“Can’t think of a better definition: Virtue is limiting your behavior”—Micah Pezdirtz
Via Negativa in Everything.
It’s very hard to learn.
Via Positiva Ideal, and Via Negativa Real.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 06:41:00 UTC
-
“Every virtue can be expressed as a limit.”—Luke Weinhagen
—“Every virtue can be expressed as a limit.”—Luke Weinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 06:29:00 UTC
-
CONFLATION AND DEFLATION OF … —“… Are lies beautiful, Curt?”—Digue Doug
CONFLATION AND DEFLATION OF …
—“… Are lies beautiful, Curt?”—Digue Doug
Pleasure(Self) and Beauty(Common) are two different things. Truth(Opportunity), Beauty(Fertility), Goodness(Plenty, Morality), are goods. Whether we seek to pay the Cost of them determines whether they are preferences and pleasures of the self as well as Goods for the Commons – or not.
Lies can be ‘elegant, sophisticated, artful’ in the sense that the human effort and ability it took to produce them demonstrates excellence, superiority, and ability. But to conflate the CRAFT (excellence), with the CONTENT (beauty) is a sophism by either fraud or error.
( Thought you were gonna play a word game with me? lol nope. lotsa nope. 😉 )
hugs
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 06:29:00 UTC
-
BETWEEN THE IDEAL AND THE REAL: LIMITS The difference between the ideal and the
BETWEEN THE IDEAL AND THE REAL: LIMITS
The difference between the ideal and the real, is limits. There are no infinities of morality, or charity, any more than of resources or measurements. The unlimited=the ideal, and the l limited=the real. We have a deep desire for simple rules. But simple rules without limits – including christian love – are ideals (errors), not reals (judgments).
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-05 00:29:00 UTC
-
Their Method of Argument…
[I] have (((Their))) Method of Argument down in form. James has it down in stages of argument and counter-argument. We just need to educate everyone on it. Then we need to educate everyone that the only reason to NOT engage in ‘warfare’ and instead in debate, is if we are actually debating in order to determine a trade when we don’t agree, or a good, when we do. Then we need to engage in ‘War’ often enough that we suppress the ‘poisoning of the well’.