OLOGY VS ISM
by Bill Joslin
New corrected dichotomy” *-ology vs *-ism.
*-Ologies exist as mean of measurement and utility; *-isms as rationalizations for doxia and opinion.
( ouch I’m gonna have to do some work because of that one ..)
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-07 02:09:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070862822362546178
sophism, pseudoscience, mysticism, escapism, denialism, relativism, nihilism
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-07 01:31:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070853295374299136
Even if the illustration is a poor analogy, it does get the point across that constant relations may remain constant across inconstant (inconsistent, incompatible, incommensurable) theories, paradigms, sciences(frames). (The illustration is consistent, compatible, commensurable.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-07 01:14:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070848941804175360
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @SteveStuWill
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070845608477507589
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070845608477507589
RT @SteveStuWill: The same facts are compatible with any number of different theories. https://www.facebook.com/groups/PsychologicalDynamics/permalink/2076196065971778/ https://t.co/BEsY7vPVXC
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 23:09:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070817489108512769
Steve.. Correct. But that does not mean that there is not one most parsimonious paradigm (truth). Only that we converge on or diverge from by the market for theories and falsifications. We appear to be doing quite well at anything we can test.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 23:09:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070817432598667264
Reply addressees: @SteveStuWill
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1069756255835586560
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1069756255835586560
WHAT TEACHING METHOD ARE YOU SEEING HERE?
(‘one room schoolhouse’, ‘scraps of your attention’, ‘games’)
I write series, tables, definitions, aphorisms, arguments, expositions. (See ‘Koans’.) For color (breaks) I write essays, opinion, nonsense, and diary entries.
Why? best way to teach complexity by using scraps of your attention. a book (which i am still editing) would crush all but the few. These “games” allow a lot of people to learn a little at a time at their pace, with new people coming on board all the time. people go away and return when the are ready. some spin off. some quickly master.
i cant control the classroom so i control the content. very much like running a big one room schoolhouse: repetition at different levels of complexity while asking some students to help others.
it is the old, pre-industrial method of teaching and it is more suitable for teaching where the industrial method is good only for sorting people and filtering them into occupational groups.
IMO we should work and socialize more, exercise more, read more, and run classes like this instead of how we do today.
-Curt
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 21:31:00 UTC
OLOGY VS ISM
by Bill Joslin
New corrected dichotomy” *-ology vs *-ism.
*-Ologies exist as mean of measurement and utility; *-isms as rationalizations for doxia and opinion.
( ouch I’m gonna have to do some work because of that one ..)
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 21:09:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47577570_10156829283012264_2697690003957350400_o_10156829283007264.jpg Q:CURT: WHY THE SERIES OF TERMS?
(LESSON)Jarrod MarmaNot gonna claim that I “got it” but I just figured it was possible synonyms or word associations of sortsDec 6, 2018, 9:05 PMGreg HamiltonI certainly don’t know your system nor your language at any level of mastery, but I always know thats on me because I haven’t done the work.
The time a man should ask questions is when he’s doing the work and stuck and needs helps making the next step.
If he hasn’t exhausted his own efforts he should generally be quiet and keep working at it. (and keep his ears open)Dec 6, 2018, 9:07 PMCurt DoolittleYou are at the high end of the competence and confidence spectrum. What I need to work with someone is intellectual honesty and at least some ability so that there are returns on my labor. some guys just want to be able to understand and identify those that are competent and confident so that they can work with and follow them. We don’t need everyone a general.. lolDec 6, 2018, 9:47 PMAlex CastoHi Curt, why do you make the best posts of anyone on the so called right all day everyday? I can’t understand.Dec 6, 2018, 9:55 PMCurt DoolittleChronic OCD, Accumulated Knowledge because of it, Absurd effort few can afford, Endless Love of my People, and lots of practice… lolDec 6, 2018, 9:59 PMCurt DoolittleSorry… just had to run with your lead in… -hugs lolDec 6, 2018, 9:59 PMGreg HamiltonROI is important. There are only so many hours in the day and time is the most precious resource.Dec 6, 2018, 10:02 PMAlex CastoGood on you Sir. Everything takes works. Some people are just lazy.Dec 6, 2018, 10:03 PMGreg HamiltonOh and thanks, I’ll take my compliments when I can get them.Dec 6, 2018, 10:29 PMQ:CURT: WHY THE SERIES OF TERMS?
(LESSON)
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 21:01:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47577570_10156829283012264_2697690003957350400_o_10156829283007264.jpg Q:CURT: WHY THE SERIES OF TERMS?
(LESSON)Jarrod MarmaNot gonna claim that I “got it” but I just figured it was possible synonyms or word associations of sortsDec 6, 2018, 9:05 PMGreg HamiltonI certainly don’t know your system nor your language at any level of mastery, but I always know thats on me because I haven’t done the work.
The time a man should ask questions is when he’s doing the work and stuck and needs helps making the next step.
If he hasn’t exhausted his own efforts he should generally be quiet and keep working at it. (and keep his ears open)Dec 6, 2018, 9:07 PMDann HopkinsI mean you could just put a little “->” between terms to avoid being cryptic but fairDec 6, 2018, 9:12 PMCurt Doolittlelol.. love you man. ;)Dec 6, 2018, 9:45 PMCurt DoolittleYou are at the high end of the competence and confidence spectrum. What I need to work with someone is intellectual honesty and at least some ability so that there are returns on my labor. some guys just want to be able to understand and identify those that are competent and confident so that they can work with and follow them. We don’t need everyone a general.. lolDec 6, 2018, 9:47 PMAlex CastoHi Curt, why do you make the best posts of anyone on the so called right all day everyday? I can’t understand.Dec 6, 2018, 9:55 PMCurt DoolittleChronic OCD, Accumulated Knowledge because of it, Absurd effort few can afford, Endless Love of my People, and lots of practice… lolDec 6, 2018, 9:59 PMCurt DoolittleSorry… just had to run with your lead in… -hugs lolDec 6, 2018, 9:59 PMGreg HamiltonROI is important. There are only so many hours in the day and time is the most precious resource.Dec 6, 2018, 10:02 PMAlex CastoGood on you Sir. Everything takes works. Some people are just lazy.Dec 6, 2018, 10:03 PMGreg HamiltonOh and thanks, I’ll take my compliments when I can get them.Dec 6, 2018, 10:29 PMQ:CURT: WHY THE SERIES OF TERMS?
(LESSON)
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 21:01:00 UTC
deceit, suggestion, sophism, pseudoscience, mysticism, escapism, denialism, relativism, nihilism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 20:31:00 UTC