Curt Doolittle

Category: Epistemology and Method

  • You’re a smart enough guy and you can probably undrestand the grammars, the oper

    You’re a smart enough guy and you can probably undrestand the grammars, the operational grammar, the epistemology, and the law fairly easily. (This is what people tell me.) But since we combine terms from so many disciplines and disambiguate them so heavily, terms are a pain.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-25 16:10:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088831539511808001

    Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088824696425070592

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088824696425070592

  • On the other hand the scope of this work is huge, because it begins with the com

    On the other hand the scope of this work is huge, because it begins with the completion of the scientific method and applies it to every single field at some level or other in order to create a commensurable and therefore testable language. So, on average 6m-2y to learn it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-25 16:08:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088830999973298178

    Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088824696425070592

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088824696425070592

  • Yes, um, spoken grammar and written grammar are different because it is easier t

    Yes, um, spoken grammar and written grammar are different because it is easier to continually disambiguate speech with tone and paus than the written word with () , …, -. ;, ,., lol.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-25 16:07:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088830721303736320

    Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088824696425070592

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088824696425070592

  • so yeah. the language is a problem. Which is what we tell everyone. 1- disambigu

    so yeah. the language is a problem. Which is what we tell everyone.
    1- disambiguated, operational language and grammar is hard.
    2- speaking in ePrime is hard.
    3- speaking in complete transactions is hard.
    But it converts language into algorithms.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-25 14:38:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088808212550303744

    Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088806177771802625

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088806177771802625

  • Yep. Well, if you sat down and tried to disambiguate terminology across all fiel

    Yep. Well, if you sat down and tried to disambiguate terminology across all fields into a single commensurable language limited to operations, you would probably make a few different choices in term selection, but you’d end up with the same problem: terms=measurements=precision.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-25 14:36:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088807819757920256

    Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088806177771802625

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088806177771802625

  • YEAH IT SURE LOOKS MESSY. SO DOES MATH. —“it’s like languages were to be spoke

    YEAH IT SURE LOOKS MESSY. SO DOES MATH.

    —“it’s like languages were to be spoken not written down. if you can’t write 5 volumes on your ideas, that I can’t read it at all. Don’t get me wrong your work is correct but it’s so god damn awful messy”—Mediocre Croat

    Yes, um, spoken grammar and written grammar are different because it is easier to continually disambiguate speech with tone and paus than the written word with () , …, -. ;, ,., lol.

    On the other hand the scope of this work is huge, because it begins with the completion of the scientific method and applies it to every single field at some level or other in order to create a commensurable and therefore testable language. So, on average 6m-2y to learn it.

    You’re a smart enough guy and you can probably undrestand the grammars, the operational grammar, the epistemology, and the law fairly easily. (This is what people tell me.) But since we combine terms from so many disciplines and disambiguate them so heavily, terms are a pain.

    No other way to turn a lot of ‘very conflated colloquial language’ for the purpose of discounts on conveying meaning by free association, into a set of measurements for the purpose of prohibiting ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, fraud, and deceit prohibiting free assoc.

    There is no short route to algebraic geometry, no short route to the current law, and not short route to testimonial speech. Just is what it is. As Max Weber suggested, the future would consist entirely of reducing all knowledge to some form of calculation.

    Not that someone wont come along after me and simplify it, but honestly how do you simplify something as simple as this: https://www.facebook.com/thepropertarianinstitute/posts/1989176281196492 … Aside from the Grammars and Operational Grammar that’s about has simple as it can be.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-25 11:19:00 UTC

  • TERMINOLOGICAL SUBTLETY I use the spectra: Display (visible signals) … Word (s

    TERMINOLOGICAL SUBTLETY

    I use the spectra:

    Display (visible signals)

    … Word (sound/speech)

    … … Deed (action)

    Sense (stimuli)

    … Perception (stimuli with memory)

    … … Prediction (imagine)

    … … … Experience

    … … … … Memory (result)

    … … … … … Recursion

    … … … … … … Intuition

    … … … … … … … Free Association

    … … … … … … … … Thinking

    … … … … … … … … … Reasoning

    … … … … … … … … … … Calculating

    … … … … … … … … … … … Computing

    Imitation (physical) >

    … Empathy (emotional) >

    … … Sympathy (thought) >

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-24 12:08:00 UTC

  • INDIFFERENCE IN FRAMES AND PARADIGMS

    https://www.studyfinds.org/avoiding-social-media-privacy-still-risk/MARGINAL INDIFFERENCE IN FRAMES AND PARADIGMS

    https://www.studyfinds.org/avoiding-social-media-privacy-still-risk/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 22:51:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM’S INTELLECTUAL CONTEXT BY KASH VIKAAS. —“Propertarianism and i

    PROPERTARIANISM’S INTELLECTUAL CONTEXT BY KASH VIKAAS.

    —“Propertarianism and its proxy testimonialism is the operational theory of critical naturalism (praxis). Naturalism was the dominant theory of modern idealism before postmodernism before grammatology (Derrida) appeared on the scene.”—

    Well, you know, in the context of grammatology, I also produced the table of the grammars which is sort of the Periodic Table of Speech.

    My view of Derrida and grammatology is that they’re just updating pilpul (sophism), for the same reason the rabbis invented pilpul (sophism) and the same reason plato invented idealism (sophism).

    So social construction from the postmoderns, and the prohibition of social construction (sophism) from propertarianism (critical naturalism).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 16:01:00 UTC

  • WHY WE FAILED So you see, the reasons the west could not defeat the rise of pseu

    WHY WE FAILED

    So you see, the reasons the west could not defeat the rise of pseudoscience (marxism) and sophism (postmodernism) and denialism (feminism) is because of:

    (1) we spoke in religious, philosophical, and moral middle class language, and;

    (2) because our group strategy and reason for success is eugenic,;

    (3) our organizing principle is actually our law (martial and judicial class) and tripartism, not our philosophy(middle class) universal or religion (administrative class) universal;

    (4) we lacked understanding of our organizing principle and its difference from other civilizations; had no practice in using it against administrative and middle class moralisms, sophims, supernaturalisms, and pseudosciences, and;

    (5) universal enfranchisement in a single house majoritarian democracy is logically and empirically counter to the tradition of our law (sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty), our group strategy (sovereignty, tripartism, commons and eugenic evolution).

    In retrospect it isn’t complicated but in the process it was chaos.

    But now we know. Truth is enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 13:07:00 UTC