THE ONLY REASON TO USE A GRAMMAR OF LYING – IS TO LIE.
GA = Postmodernism = Abrahamism = Sophism = Deceit.
Funny how so many people accuse me of incomprehensibility, but then I CAN explain – in extremis – any of my positions, given the attention and intellectual honesty of the audience.
There is nothing complex about Despotism. There is nothing complex about arguing for Despotism. There is nothing complex in that many people can be fooled by sophism, pseudoscience, supernaturalism, and false promise into temporary support of various forms of despotism. Despotism is in the interests of the underclasses always, and the elite classes, usually, but against the laboring, working, and middle classes always.
It is not in anyone’s interest to pursue despotism – except those who lack merit.
1) hypothesis > theory > law vs law > legislation > regulation > command. 2) ideology is a means of inspiring political action. ideologies need not be and rarely are rational nor consistent nor coherent. See Andrew Heywood’s book Ideologies.
@curtdoolittle @frattinicaue @JFGariepy Law is a system of rules that people make up to govern their societies. “Ideology” is a vague term, but I would define it as a system of ideas that gives people a group identity. Ideology is used as the basis of a social movement or organization.
Don’t be silly. I’m wrong all the time. The whole point of argument is to discover you errors. But when it comes to what I specialize in it will be very, very, very, hard to find fault.
Don’t be silly. I’m wrong all the time. The whole point of argument is to discover your errors. But when it comes to what I specialize in it will be very, very, very, hard to find fault.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51562061_10156975381357264_6415164127710281728_o_10156975381352264.jpg Steven KolpekReals and Materials over Feels and Ideals?Feb 9, 2019, 3:22 PM
Testimonial arguments consist of deflating and disambiguating deceitful, fictional, ideal, analogical, ordinary, formal, logical, empirical, statements into complete sentences stated in operational vocabulary and grammar (eprime), that survive tests of consistency and therefore coherence in the possible dimensions of human cognition, including categorical(identity), consistency (logical), correspondence (empirical), existentially possible (operational), rational (voluntary), reciprocal (reciprocally voluntary) dimensions, scope (full accounting and limits).
Any statement or set of statements or arguments that cannot be reduced to such operational vocabulary and grammar and pass such tests cannot be subject to truth claims, since the information (knowledge) necessary to testify that it is true does not exist.
The purpose of this grammar, like math, formal logic, algorithmic logic, accounting, is to expose ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms of supernatural, ideal, and pseudoscientific), and outright deceit in claims to truth or goodness (morality) of propositions, and to prohibit such claims in commerce, finance, economics, law, politics, and the academy under law, thereby enabling the citizenry to use the negative market of the law to prosecute for profit those who engage in informational harm to the commons.
“Think of the language of propertarianism like this:
Humans have possibly three emotional drivers: activation-rest, pain-pleasure, dominance-submission. And on top of those three we find our big five/six personality drivers – our sensitivity to those three emotional drivers. And on top of that the rather broad cacaphony of emotions you can see in diagrams of our emotinal ranges. And on top of that the combinations of all those emotions as we react to the complex symphony of emotions we feel when we percieve the any complex thing constituted in multiple causes and consequences.
But underneath all those layers is a very simple machine that wants to obtain access to a higher ratio of calories under it’s control than the cost to obtain and consume them.
And it turns out that the list of things we like to collect in our inventory, so that we find security and pleasure in our condition, is fairly small. We call it ‘property in toto’: those things people act to obtain, defend, transform, trade, and consume.
So, if we speak in the language of the gain or loss of property in toto, we circumvent the apparent complexity of those emotions, the lies and denials that accompany them, we can state all of human perception, cognition, knowledge, advocacy, and action as reactions to the changes in the state of their inventory – and nothing more.
it only seems complex to learn to speak in causes rather than experiences. But the causes are much more simply: “what is this person attempting to acquire, or defend, and is he doing it truthfully and morally or untruthfully and immorally?”
From this perspective, the argumentative power of propertarianism is so all encompassing because it relies upon first cause. But that said, it’s actually *very simple* compared to the arguments consisting of experiences, analogies, and deceits.”
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51474531_10156966669717264_4269068342557409280_o_10156966669712264.jpg GO BIG OR GO HOME. ;)Nick DahlheimYou can’t count or build, Curt Doolittle….that pyramid isn’t big enough or beautiful enough….I think you’re off by 99,000,988 skulls….Feb 6, 2019, 12:33 AMNick Dahlheim😂Feb 6, 2019, 12:33 AMStephen ThomasGotta pump those numbers up!Feb 6, 2019, 12:38 AMTimmy MatlockI don’t have time to bleach all those.Feb 6, 2019, 12:38 AMJames Dmitro MakienkoWhat should we build first – the wall or the pyramid?Feb 6, 2019, 12:47 AMRoss Michael IIThat’s a good start…Feb 6, 2019, 12:48 AMJWarren PrescottThis is the Turkey-Syria Border wall. It’s recently finished. I’m sure these contractors are anxious to start a new project and we have a massive military budget.Feb 6, 2019, 12:50 AMDarren HowellFeb 6, 2019, 12:55 AMJoseph KelleyYou’ve gone over skulls and heads as currency, but have you discussed whether or not teeth as a sub-currency could be viable?Feb 6, 2019, 1:03 AMDarren HowellRum, Whiskey, or Mead??Feb 6, 2019, 1:03 AMPhilip ChristopherDarren Howell Yes.Feb 6, 2019, 1:08 AMDarren HowellJoseph Kelley a full mouth has 32 teeth… so, how many teeth to equal the value of 1 skull? 32? Or some other value?Feb 6, 2019, 1:09 AMTobias DarbyIt’s a start…Feb 6, 2019, 1:54 AMTobias DarbyToo easy to create forgeries…Feb 6, 2019, 1:55 AMJoshua D. HickoxFeb 6, 2019, 1:57 AMSolomon VolodymyrI wonder how many years of messing around and debating with libtards it took for them to build this… oh none because it’s a dictatorship that actually gets things done.Feb 6, 2019, 1:59 AMJoseph KelleyI’ve got no idea how it would work. That’s why I’m appealing to greater minds than my own.Feb 6, 2019, 2:24 AMNick DahlheimFinally, we have a monetary policy that is smarter than that of Helicopter Ben. :PFeb 6, 2019, 3:13 AMJohn John StephensEh, a shrunken head might be better. LOLFeb 6, 2019, 4:54 AMJeffrey ElvinIts not much but it is honest work.Feb 6, 2019, 7:44 AMGO BIG OR GO HOME. 😉
