IMPORTANT INSIGHT –
Propertarianism, once mastered, radically reduces the time investment in the suppression of falsehood. I’m only getting there myself now, but once you master the main arguments of the economics of everything you can undermine most cheap attempts at theft with just as much brevity. It’s just work to get there.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 21:44:00 UTC
WORDS OF WISDOM: THE KING OF THE HILL EDUCATION
—“Riffing off each other creates the best teaching posts and the best learning posts… the best way to learn something is to teach it….. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496846790912216&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 17:30:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189957785682886657
YOU MISS THE POINT. ANTI-MATERIALISM IS A SOPHISM TO COVER FOR LYING. WE SEEK GAINS AND TO PREVENT LOSSES.
—“But I think you miss the mark somewhat here because heroism is fundamentally not about the material or Darwinian advantages.”—
Heroism is a means of paying status and opportunity rather than material rewards, in exchange for directing dominance display to the production of commons. those commons may be physical, may be opportunities, may be, normative, may be informational or anything in between.
So your mistake is failing to grasp that the use of ‘materialism’ as a criticism is an attempt to lie. instead, we seek gains whether material, opportunistic, or informational, and to prevent losses of the same. Because in all things we are simply an extension of the physical laws of the universe, with nothing other than the use of memory to choose optimum opportunities, rather than fae the limits of the physical world in seizing the first opportunity. it is by this vast accumulation of differences using different forms of memory that we capture and resist entropy while the reset of the universe decays.
If I can get this thru: if you cannot convert an emotion to its underlying economic terms, then you are still talking superstition. It’s pseudoscientific superstition. But it’s superstition. In this example you are still thinking feelings have value, instead of that we evolved to experience positive and negative feelings for having increasing or decreasing assets, in physical (premium), opportunistic(discount), or informational (discount) form.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 13:39:00 UTC
I can read the equations that capture the entire description of the physical universe. Other people need prose, and others videos.
The audience is ‘everyone able, and no one unable’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 12:18:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189879378831986689
Reply addressees: @StanGalerius
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189878809635573761
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@StanGalerius For some of you, an explanation is required.
For others, a set of bullet points is required.
For others an aphorism is required.
For others a diagram is required.
Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189878809635573761
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@StanGalerius For some of you, an explanation is required.
For others, a set of bullet points is required.
For others an aphorism is required.
For others a diagram is required.
Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189878809635573761
For some of you, an explanation is required.
For others, a set of bullet points is required.
For others an aphorism is required.
For others a diagram is required.
Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 12:16:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189878809635573761
Reply addressees: @StanGalerius
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189878244398505984
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@StanGalerius Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189878244398505984
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@StanGalerius Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1189878244398505984
Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means?
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 12:14:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189878244398505984
Reply addressees: @StanGalerius
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189876984446361602
IN REPLY TO:
@StanGalerius
@curtdoolittle Seriously, why don’t you write in sentences, the layperson can understand? Nobody, absolutely nobody wants to carry dictionary or Thesaurus around with them. Again, seriously, who is your audience?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189876984446361602
THE AUDIENCE IS ‘EVERYONE ABLE, AND NO ONE UNABLE’.
—“Seriously, why don’t you write in sentences, the layperson can understand? Nobody, absolutely nobody wants to carry dictionary or Thesaurus around with them. Again, seriously, who is your audience?”—
Seriously, why don’t you recognize that I write the same set of concepts in in essay, argument, aphorism, ‘poetic list’, table, graph, and serialized form because each of these forms increases the informational density of the content, providing different minds, different means?
For some of you, an explanation is required.
For others, a set of bullet points is required.
For others an aphorism is required.
For others a diagram is required.
Because some of us rapidly understand complex relations quickly and some of us need them explained in prose.
I can read the equations that capture the entire description of the physical universe. Other people need prose, and others videos, and others cartoons.
The audience is ‘everyone able, and no one unable’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 08:22:00 UTC
Nothing I say sounds like postmodern philosophy because it’s all lying. Sounds like = I don’t understand. Instead, tell me what you don’t understand.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 22:59:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189678305290674179
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189675453361147904
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189675453361147904
ONLY FALSEHOODS CREATE COMPLEXITIES
(don’t get pissed at me for this. it’s true. Truth isn’t always pleasant and the law isn’t always something people are willing to enforce.)
—“The abortion topic is a paradox and a false equivalency for example. Too complex to boil down to a yes or no.”–Wade Rogers
mmm… I just say it’s undecidable, not because it is complex, but because the only moral thing to be done is not commit the crime of fertility in the first place, creating the undecidable moral hazard.
We don’t do the right thing because we don’t want to. But the right thing is to punish the mother. It cannot happen without her conspiracy.
So that is the violation of natural law – period.
But since we wont enforce it we convince our selves that abortion is complicated.
No, all lies create complication. The truth is simple.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 22:39:00 UTC
I call it Vitruvianism in honor of Davinci’s Vitruivan Man.
—“Man is the System of Weights and Measures for all things Human”—
But the first man to say it:
—“Man is the measure of all things.”— Protagoras
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:32:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189580745683197953