Category: Epistemology and Method

  • WHAT DOES EMPIRICAL MEAN (core) Empirical: Reciprocally Observable, and therefor

    WHAT DOES EMPIRICAL MEAN

    (core)

    Empirical: Reciprocally Observable, and therefore agreeable, or disagreeable.

    1. Empirical means observable such that claims can be intersubjectively verifiable or falsifiable: meaning the observation can be “agreed or disagreed upon”;

    2. in addition it means a sufficient volume of observations that we falsify the fragility of episodic memories, our tendency to err, our tendency to find patterns that don’t exist, or to bias the results, and to use both to deceive ;

    3. in addition it means using physical instruments of measurement to compensate for the limits of our senses, perception, and the resulting limits to intuition, prediction, and memory;

    4. in addition it means using logical instruments of measurement (testing) of constant, contingent, inconstant, and non-relations to compensate for the limits of our intuition, imagination, prediction, and reason and as such to prevent claims made in ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.

    5. together consisting of tests of reciprocity of information, and the possibility of Agreement or disagreement by reciprocity of information using due diligence in the falsification of sense, perception, intuition, prediction, and claim by RECIPROCAL due diligence using quantity, quality, consistency, causality.

    See the value of operational language?

    If you have the words for it, most philosophical discourses is rendered nonsense.

    See how law (competition) differs from philosophy by reduction to reciprocity not the self (philosophical justification).

    Like I said, in almost all cases philosophical questions are sophisms due to idealism rather than realism – operational language.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-10 08:22:00 UTC

  • TRUTH: “TESTIMONY THAT SATISFIES DEMAND FOR INFALLIBILITY” (complete definition

    TRUTH: “TESTIMONY THAT SATISFIES DEMAND FOR INFALLIBILITY”

    (complete definition of truth for newbs)

    WHERE TRUTH CONSISTS IN THE SERIES

    1. Tautological Truth: That testimony you give when promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity.

    2. Analytic Truth: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth).

    3. Ideal Truth: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.)

    4. Truthfulness: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, fictionalism, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.

    5. Reasonableness: that testimony (description) you give, as justification for your reporting of your belief, justification, preference, coice, or actions with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.

    6. Honesty: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.

    WHERE TRUTHFUL SPEECH

    1. Satisfies the Demand for *Increasing Infallibility of Decidability

    GIVEN

    The Series:

    1. Intelligible: Decidable enough to imagine a conceptual relationship

    2. Reasonable: Decidable enough for me to feel confident that my decision will satisfy my needs, and is not a waste of time, energy, resources.

    3. Actionable: Decidable enough for me to take actions given time, effort, knowledge, resources.

    4. Ethical and Moral: Decidable enough for me to not impose risk or costs upon the interests of others, or cause others to retaliate against me, if they have knowledge of and transparency into my actions.

    5. Normative: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.

    6. Judicial: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different knowledge, comprehension and values.

    7. Scientific: Decidable regardless of all opinions or perspectives (True)

    8. Logical: Decidable out of physical or logical necessity

    9. Tautological: Decidedly identical in properties (referents) if not references (terms). So to borrow the one of many terms from Economics, we can see in this series (list) a market demand for increasingly infallible decidability.

    WHERE THE SPEECH IS CONSISTS OF:

    1. Complete Sentences

    2. In promissory form

    3. In testimonial form

    4. In operational vocabulary (as actions)

    5. absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)

    6. including all changes in state

    7. including all consequences of change in state

    8. from an observer’s point of view

    9. producing a series of testable transactions.

    WHERE THE CRITERIA FOR TRUTHFUL SPEECH IS:

    Coherence Across the Dimensions Testifiable by Man, in The Series:

    1. Categorically Consistent (Non-conflationary, Differences)

    Internally Consistent (Logical)

    2. Externally Correspondent (Empirical)

    3. Operationally Consistent (Consisting of Operational Terms that are Repeatable and Testable)

    4. Rational Choice (Consisting of Rational choice, in available time frame)

    5.Reciprocal (Consisting of Reciprocally Rational Choice)

    6. With Stated Limits and Fully Accounted (Defense against cherry picking and inflation)

    7. Warrantied

    … (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions;

    … (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility;

    … (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.

    AS A DEFENSE AGAINST THE SERIES:

    1. Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;

    2. Error and failure of Due Diligence;

    3. Bias and Wishful Thinking;

    4. And the many Deceits of:

    … (a) Loading and Framing;

    … (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and Overloading and Propaganda;

    … (c) Fictionalisms of Sophisms, Pseudorationalisms, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism;

    … (d) and outright Fabrications (fictions).

    IN DEFENSE OR ADVOCACY OF:

    Any transfer that is not reciprocal, the tests of:

    … (a) productive

    … (b) fully informed, fully accounted

    … (c) warrantied and within the limits of liability

    … (d) voluntary

    … (e) free of externality of the same criteria

    INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO

    The Series of:

    … (a) murder,

    … (b) harm, damage, theft,

    … (c) fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection,baiting into hazard

    … (d) free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons,

    … (e) rent seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism,

    … (f) conversion(religion/pseudoscience),

    … (g) displacement(immigration/overbreeding),

    … (ah) conquest (war).

    ===

    That I know of that, is the most complete definition of truth available.

    You might think there is some way to outwit it… but you’ll be wrong. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-09 22:09:00 UTC

  • Science (Truth) > Law (Decidability-Action) > Philosophy (Choice-Reason) > Faith

    Science (Truth) > Law (Decidability-Action) > Philosophy (Choice-Reason) > Faith (Wisdom-Intuition)

    Otherwise you lie.
    And you lie to defend your lie.
    And you are an enemy of our people.

    Trifunctionalism: Military, Law, Faith. Each in its place.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 15:02:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246815398101766144

    Reply addressees: @MillikanTamzin @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246814528156979202


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MillikanTamzin @DudeMaximus It use the truth. You find it painful. I am sorry. That is the purpose of the law of testimony, and it’s epistemology, science.If you are a Fundamentalist at the expense of kin and law then you are a threat to our people. Trifunctionalism: Military, Law, Faith. Each in its place.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1246814528156979202

  • It use the truth. You find it painful. I am sorry. That is the purpose of the la

    It use the truth. You find it painful. I am sorry. That is the purpose of the law of testimony, and it’s epistemology, science.If you are a Fundamentalist at the expense of kin and law then you are a threat to our people. Trifunctionalism: Military, Law, Faith. Each in its place.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 14:58:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246814528156979202

    Reply addressees: @MillikanTamzin @DudeMaximus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246811604538318849

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/92324954_249561333108694_21594331704

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/92324954_249561333108694_21594331704

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/92324954_249561333108694_2159433170435440640_o_249561326442028.jpg OUR PEOPLE USE AT LEAST THREE GRAMMARS, SPEAK IN A COMPROMISE GRAMMAR (important)

    (a grammar = paradigm, vocabulary, operations, logic)

    1) Theology (intuition) Feminine

    2) Philosophy (reason) Compromise

    3) Law-Science (action) Masculine.

    and otherwise in:

    4) Ordinary (normative) language

    Some of us specialize. Some of us generalize (ordinary language). Some of us combine.

    I largely speak in law-science

    I can bridge to philosophy (rationalism)

    I can bridge to theology (intuition)

    This bridges mean ‘compromise on common ground’ and avoid uncommon ground.

    We are common ground on natural law, christian love, and some sort of constitution (usually).

    We are on uncommon ground on atheism, fundamentalism, sophistry and critique, and pseudoscience.

    Western civilization has always been trifunctional, with ‘priests’ for law, and faith, and generals for war. We can only succeed as western civilization as trifunctional. Because human beings feel, think, and act by trifunctional differences. Because those differences are biological. And it is the COMPROMISE between those positions by exchange within the market despite our desires for extremes exclusively in our interests that allowed us to out-compete all other peoples until the second semitic destruction of our civilization from within in the 20th century.OUR PEOPLE USE AT LEAST THREE GRAMMARS, SPEAK IN A COMPROMISE GRAMMAR (important)

    (a grammar = paradigm, vocabulary, operations, logic)

    1) Theology (intuition) Feminine

    2) Philosophy (reason) Compromise

    3) Law-Science (action) Masculine.

    and otherwise in:

    4) Ordinary (normative) language

    Some of us specialize. Some of us generalize (ordinary language). Some of us combine.

    I largely speak in law-science

    I can bridge to philosophy (rationalism)

    I can bridge to theology (intuition)

    This bridges mean ‘compromise on common ground’ and avoid uncommon ground.

    We are common ground on natural law, christian love, and some sort of constitution (usually).

    We are on uncommon ground on atheism, fundamentalism, sophistry and critique, and pseudoscience.

    Western civilization has always been trifunctional, with ‘priests’ for law, and faith, and generals for war. We can only succeed as western civilization as trifunctional. Because human beings feel, think, and act by trifunctional differences. Because those differences are biological. And it is the COMPROMISE between those positions by exchange within the market despite our desires for extremes exclusively in our interests that allowed us to out-compete all other peoples until the second semitic destruction of our civilization from within in the 20th century.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-05 11:19:00 UTC

  • If you want a substitute mommy (preacher) go find one. I’m a substitute drill se

    If you want a substitute mommy (preacher) go find one. I’m a substitute drill sergeant when necessary and a judge when possible. Truth is merciless. That’s why europeans are the only people to develop it as a normative institution. Paternalism requires intolerance.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-04 19:34:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246521457498378240

    Reply addressees: @Raspy_Groyper @af_clips @realThomBieler @NickJFuentes @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246520116323528705


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Raspy_Groyper @af_clips @realThomBieler @NickJFuentes @JohnMarkSays Because I counter-signaled af_clips counter-signaling by GSRRM rather than argument? 😉

    It’s important to discipline children so that we preserve the civil society.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1246520116323528705

  • Serialize rather than idealize. Operationalize rather than analogize. Aristotle

    Serialize rather than idealize.

    Operationalize rather than analogize.

    Aristotle got it almost right.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-04 16:31:00 UTC

  • The Pattern Is That There Is No Pattern

    The Pattern Is That There Is No Pattern. https://t.co/cO6MspZpEW


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 19:47:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246162370809991168

  • Yep: Divination, Astrology, Numerology, Scriptural, Stock market, Noise-Data int

    Yep: Divination, Astrology, Numerology, Scriptural, Stock market, Noise-Data interpretation.

    (Today: the minor racial delta in Detroit mortality without the obvious age, smoking, and other lifestyle risk given the left leaning distribution of the African American demographic.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 19:46:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1246162166404743169

    Reply addressees: @toad_spotted

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1245801768543494144

  • “It’s ok to have an opinion. But it’s better to not.”—Stephen Thomas

    —“It’s ok to have an opinion. But it’s better to not.”—Stephen Thomas


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 14:10:00 UTC