Testimony consists of… https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/testimony-consists-of/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 16:23:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267129660883820544
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
Testimony consists of…
Nov 13, 2019, 10:27 AM Testimony (Propertarianism) consists of … the use of procedural falsification; … in all dimensions of human perception; … resulting in the completion of the Scientific Method ; … its application to the totality of human knowledge; … resulting in a universally commensurable language of all thought; … its embodiment in the common law of tort; … its use in the construction of a template for constitutions; … and as a consequence creating a market for the prosecution of; … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit … and the eradication of: … … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit … from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons; … reversing the second Semitic attempt at the destruction of Western Civilization as it has destroyed every other by systematic undermining from within; … and restoring the quality of life we have expected from Western Civilization; … for those that live today, and those that will yet live in the future;”
-
Testimony consists of…
Nov 13, 2019, 10:27 AM Testimony (Propertarianism) consists of … the use of procedural falsification; … in all dimensions of human perception; … resulting in the completion of the Scientific Method ; … its application to the totality of human knowledge; … resulting in a universally commensurable language of all thought; … its embodiment in the common law of tort; … its use in the construction of a template for constitutions; … and as a consequence creating a market for the prosecution of; … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit … and the eradication of: … … … superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit … from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons; … reversing the second Semitic attempt at the destruction of Western Civilization as it has destroyed every other by systematic undermining from within; … and restoring the quality of life we have expected from Western Civilization; … for those that live today, and those that will yet live in the future;”
-
Repeat after me: “I don’t know yet”
Repeat after me: “I don’t know yet” https://t.co/9sKr5xU7Wt
-
Repeat after me: “I don’t know yet”
Repeat after me: “I don’t know yet” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/repeat-after-me-i-dont-know-yet/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 13:56:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267092658918428673
-
Repeat after me: “I don’t know yet”
Every time some conservative asserts something in confidence despite his relative ignorance, he is no different from his consumptive (liberal) counterpart. The only ‘truthful’ empirical, and therefore ‘conservative’ answer is: “i don’t know yet” But ‘i know…’ is merely a statement of being lazy or incompetent.
-
Repeat after me: “I don’t know yet”
Every time some conservative asserts something in confidence despite his relative ignorance, he is no different from his consumptive (liberal) counterpart. The only ‘truthful’ empirical, and therefore ‘conservative’ answer is: “i don’t know yet” But ‘i know…’ is merely a statement of being lazy or incompetent.
-
“I don’t claim to know everything and I only speak about stuff I’m reasonably co
–“I don’t claim to know everything and I only speak about stuff I’m reasonably confident about.”— Martin Stepan
A wise man speaks. And when he says ‘confident’ he means, he can construct a proof of possibility in p-logic avoiding the appeal to intuition (randomness) for decidability. This man is very clearly a master of the logic of natural law.
-
“I don’t claim to know everything and I only speak about stuff I’m reasonably co
–“I don’t claim to know everything and I only speak about stuff I’m reasonably confident about.”— Martin Stepan
A wise man speaks. And when he says ‘confident’ he means, he can construct a proof of possibility in p-logic avoiding the appeal to intuition (randomness) for decidability. This man is very clearly a master of the logic of natural law.
-
The lost virtue of “I don’t know”—Steve Pender
—The lost virtue of “I don’t know”—Steve Pender