Curt Doolittle

Category: Epistemology and Method

  • Truth is harmful. It is understandable why you would object to it. Because it me

    Truth is harmful. It is understandable why you would object to it. Because it means you have to reform yourself,your ideas, your social and political groups. And it is a burden you cannot bear – because you are unable. So you blame others for your failures in the genetic lottery.

    Reply addressees: @Alitah_H @Tomularity @PapaDanny5 @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump

  • Truth is harmful. It is understandable why you would object to it. Because it me

    Truth is harmful. It is understandable why you would object to it. Because it means you have to reform yourself,your ideas, your social and political groups. And it is a burden you cannot bear – because you are unable. So you blame others for your failures in the genetic lottery.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 11:16:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267777008890765317

    Reply addressees: @Alitah_H @Tomularity @PapaDanny5 @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267774552484065282

  • I speak the taboo truths to expose the source of the conflict of our age. Learn

    I speak the taboo truths to expose the source of the conflict of our age. Learn

    I speak the taboo truths to expose the source of the conflict of our age.

    Learn. https://t.co/1N2AWhNTaC

    Reply addressees: @alameda_ariel @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump

  • Truth is painful. That’ is why we need it. If we didn’t naturally lie to ourselv

    Truth is painful. That’ is why we need it. If we didn’t naturally lie to ourselves and each other about nearly everything the very notion of truth would be unnecessary.

    You’re unfit. It’s time to separate into blue city states and red territorial states.

    Go separate our ways.

    Reply addressees: @mbquinn318 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump

  • Truth is painful. That’ is why we need it. If we didn’t naturally lie to ourselv

    Truth is painful. That’ is why we need it. If we didn’t naturally lie to ourselves and each other about nearly everything the very notion of truth would be unnecessary.

    You’re unfit. It’s time to separate into blue city states and red territorial states.

    Go separate our ways.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 11:01:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267773282973093888

    Reply addressees: @mbquinn318 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267772326260756482

  • Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete

    Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete. https://t.co/JhSH4za5pV

  • Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete

    Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete. https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/02/demarcation-between-truthdecidability-and-choice-preference-is-complete/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 02:50:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267649862776033282

  • Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete.

    I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy only tells us choice now, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the pyramid is not philosophy but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.

  • Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete.

    I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy only tells us choice now, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the pyramid is not philosophy but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy (arbitrary ontology) has nothing to say but choice. In other words, Law (cooperation) science (evidence) are merely an extension of testimony. Which is why the west developed them. We are the only people that base our law entirely on sovereignty and therefore we have no other choice but testimony, law, science and math for decidability.

  • Reciprocity, Testimony, Dimensions

    Again. Dimensions.

    1. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions.

    2. Identity =(NAMES)

    – Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties – Constant Relations between collections of properties.

    1. Sets = (LANGUAGE)
    2. Science = (OBSERVATIONS)
    3. Operational = (ACTIONS)

    – Internally consistent (constant, consistent relations), Relations, , .) – Constant relations between collections of references – Empirical, externally correspondent, correlative – Constant Relations between collections of references and reality – Operationally consistent or operationally possible Causation – Constant Relations between collections of references, actions, and reality in time.

    1. Rational (reasonable) = (RATIONAL INCENTIVE)
      (choice)

    2. Reciprocity = (RECIPROCAL INCENTIVES)
      (cooperation)

    This is the full set of dimensions of causality that humans can perceive and compare in order to decide. Each depends upon the one before it.