TRUTH VS EMOTIONS
It’s just more EXPENSIVE to use the truth instead of optics, sentiments, propaganda,and deceit and Truth requires expensive INSURANCE by a militia of well-armed men. Which is exactly why the west evolved faster than the rest.
We made testimony our normal speech. https://t.co/NIoEwmIeMF
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
TRUTH VS EMOTIONS It’s just more EXPENSIVE to use the truth instead of optics, s
-
PRIVATE: MY NOTES NO MORE LIES P is an international movement to demand the trut
PRIVATE: MY NOTES
NO MORE LIES
P is an international movement to demand the truth in public.
Chant “No More Lies”, “Truth before Face”.
We help every people in every country.
We provide political parties and activists constitutional.
PHILOSOPHY
(forgot to capture this)
REACH
Stay on message for policy not method or philosophy
The Complex Value Proposition requires relationships
Faction Neutral
Sell Direct to activists – empower them.
Cross-Factions solved by via-negativa law
START PAC
Pac and Institute separate
Curt works for Institute
Pac for politics
Single Source of Truth
Hands Clean
MESSAGING
P-Law (Institute) vs P-Preference (PAC)
TODO
PAC Site
Event protocol and process
Talking Points
Position Pieces on all major issues.
FAQ
Task List
PRIORITY
P-Dummies Version
MY TASKS
Remove Blog history from Institute, and make archive.
Digital Signatures for the constitution
Can I escalate before election?
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 17:27:00 UTC
-
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference b
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference between logic, formal logic, operational logic, philosophy, ideology, and theology.
My work is a formal operational logic of jurisprudence, which results iin the formal logic of social science.
Reply addressees: @JackyDawg -
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference b
Yo’d have to demonstrate you knew the first thing about it, and the difference between logic, formal logic, operational logic, philosophy, ideology, and theology.
My work is a formal operational logic of jurisprudence, which results iin the formal logic of social science.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 13:46:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282310277699174402
Reply addressees: @JackyDawg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282309508140634115
-
It took me four days of pretty hard work fighting you all in the ‘arena’ to unde
It took me four days of pretty hard work fighting you all in the ‘arena’ to understand why you were all losers. It’s my research method I teach it. Adversarialism. And I understand. You’re the bad, broken, angry people. And the good people watch your carnival of shit.
Reply addressees: @dormant511 -
It took me four days of pretty hard work fighting you all in the ‘arena’ to unde
It took me four days of pretty hard work fighting you all in the ‘arena’ to understand why you were all losers. It’s my research method I teach it. Adversarialism. And I understand. You’re the bad, broken, angry people. And the good people watch your carnival of shit.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-11 01:19:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281759982330011648
Reply addressees: @dormant511
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281757864432893953
-
in order to obtain good information, all arguments must be interpreted as sincer
in order to obtain good information, all arguments must be interpreted as sincere. Like acting, you must put yourself in a sincere frame of mind. that’s why it works. It’s also why only a few people can research by KOTH gams.
Reply addressees: @_Indirection @mr_thundaro @DashMcroy @UnrankedChevron @LRockswell @TruthQuest11 -
in order to obtain good information, all arguments must be interpreted as sincer
in order to obtain good information, all arguments must be interpreted as sincere. Like acting, you must put yourself in a sincere frame of mind. that’s why it works. It’s also why only a few people can research by KOTH gams.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-09 03:46:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281072172765773825
Reply addressees: @_Indirection @mr_thundaro @DashMcroy @UnrankedChevron @LRockswell @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281071358131265536
-
(Operational prose. It’s hard to think in it. Harder to write in it. But it’s th
(Operational prose. It’s hard to think in it. Harder to write in it. But it’s the logic of the falsification of lying using ‘false promises, baiting into hazard’, of the nature of man, the malleability of man, limitless growth, and oppression vs domestication. )
Reply addressees: @poldiscourse17 @cpicciolini @jjmacnab @egavactip -
(Operational prose. It’s hard to think in it. Harder to write in it. But it’s th
(Operational prose. It’s hard to think in it. Harder to write in it. But it’s the logic of the falsification of lying using ‘false promises, baiting into hazard’, of the nature of man, the malleability of man, limitless growth, and oppression vs domestication. )
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-08 21:42:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1280980719750328324
Reply addressees: @poldiscourse17 @cpicciolini @jjmacnab @egavactip
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278825675944845314