Are you saying credentials are a Truth test? How does that not conflict with the evidence of the academy? You’re really trying the fallacy of appeal to authority?
Arguments survive the Test of Testifiability, or they don’t, regardless of who utters them.
No more lies.
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @William68332190 @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
Are you saying credentials are a Truth test? How does that not conflict with the
-
You can testify to what you claim, or you can’t. You can’t. Your claims can past
You can testify to what you claim, or you can’t. You can’t. Your claims can past the test of testifiability, or they can’t. They can’t. Then we are left only with incentives. You have incentives to lie. So you have means, motive, and opportunity to lie. Ergo: Judgment: Guilty.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 16:14:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309889107141763072
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @William68332190 @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309882277191651328
-
You can testify to what you claim, or you can’t. You can’t. Your claims can past
You can testify to what you claim, or you can’t. You can’t. Your claims can past the test of testifiability, or they can’t. They can’t. Then we are left only with incentives. You have incentives to lie. So you have means, motive, and opportunity to lie. Ergo: Judgment: Guilty.
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @William68332190 @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT -
I think you two just inspired me to disambiguate the intelligence spectrum in a
I think you two just inspired me to disambiguate the intelligence spectrum in a manner that is both comprehensible and constructivist (operational-causal). The logic we use is dependent upon what we can use. And what we can use is developmental. And sex biased, and ~preferential.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 14:23:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309861098334703618
Reply addressees: @SammySc44817825 @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309833928195276806
-
I think you two just inspired me to disambiguate the intelligence spectrum in a
I think you two just inspired me to disambiguate the intelligence spectrum in a manner that is both comprehensible and constructivist (operational-causal). The logic we use is dependent upon what we can use. And what we can use is developmental. And sex biased, and ~preferential.
Reply addressees: @SammySc44817825 @TruthQuest11 -
Even the complaint of qualia is a problem of language not experience
Even the complaint of qualia is a problem of language not experience.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 22:13:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309616934896443394
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309612016563294208
-
Even the complaint of qualia is a problem of language not experience
Even the complaint of qualia is a problem of language not experience.
Reply addressees: @SPQRIUS @SepteusT @JFGariepy @KeithWoodsYT -
(It took me a month of consious effort to switch back to academic frame from pol
(It took me a month of consious effort to switch back to academic frame from political-populist frame. Mostly what I feel is relief. Truth doesn’t require yuo make people happy. It just requires truth. )
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-24 11:00:00 UTC
-
The Solution to The Great Problem of Philosophy. Yes, Really
The Solution to The Great Problem of Philosophy. Yes, Really. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/the-solution-to-the-great-problem-of-philosophy-yes-really/
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 17:01:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307364118999965697
-
The Solution to The Great Problem of Philosophy. Yes, Really
The Solution to The Great Problem of Philosophy. Yes, Really. https://t.co/eVbTnw7hgh