Evidence is. Try to falsify it. lol
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 22:55:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345504046170443779
Reply addressees: @jcbuenaventuram
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345503325966499845
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY This is the universal epistemic process for all human kn
SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY
This is the universal epistemic process for all human knowledge.
1. Experience, auto association, free association > Idea
2. Contemplation, falsification > hypothesis
3. Testing, falsification > Proposed Theory
4. Market application falsification > Working Theory
5. Exhaustive market falsification > Surviving TheorySCIENTIFIC CLAIMS
A Fact, A Theory, and Falsification of It
1. One can claim a scientific warranty of a measure(fact) or of a narrative(theory).
2. A theory consists of two components: a transformation(operation) and a description(search).
3. And a theory requires surviving exhaustive measurements – not inference, b/c Induction is false.EXAMPLE
I avoid the covid subject because I don’t trust any data I can find. I only have any confidence in the delta in total deaths. As far as I can tell everything else is attention-seeking hype for political, academic, commercial, or selfish ends, and any semblance of ‘science’ nil.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 22:28:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105488482563506001
-
I have the world’s BEST literacy in the identification of unwarrantable claims.
I have the world’s BEST literacy in the identification of unwarrantable claims. Rarely are these claims about findings. Almost always they are about inferences from inadequate findings.
FWIW: I have far more knowledge than you do on almost every subject. (I hate chemistry tho)
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 22:03:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345490879411318787
Reply addressees: @jcbuenaventuram
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345488396081389568
-
(I’m responding to the audience that keeps asking me for opinions I don’t feel a
(I’m responding to the audience that keeps asking me for opinions I don’t feel able to answer. You’re also confusing findings (papers) and preposterous claims from fractional data. So if you’re not following the conversation, understanding the topic, shut up until you do. ) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 22:00:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345490234369323008
Reply addressees: @jcbuenaventuram
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345486935901544456
-
SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY 1. Experience, auto association, free association > Idea
SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY
1. Experience, auto association, free association > Idea
2. Contemplation, falsification > hypothesis
3. Testing, falsification > Proposed Theory
4. Market application falsification > Working Theory
5. Exhaustive market falsification > Surviving Theory https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1345483848520511495
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 21:49:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345487288273432576
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1345483848520511495
-
SCIENTIFIC CLAIMS One can claim a scientific warranty of a measure(fact) or of a
SCIENTIFIC CLAIMS
One can claim a scientific warranty of a measure(fact) or of a narrative(theory). A theory consists of two components: a transformation(operation) and a description(search), and requires surviving exhaustive measurements – not inference, b/c Induction is false. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1345463383399804929
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 21:35:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345483848520511495
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1345463383399804929
-
I cant help people who pretend knowledge and make sweeping statements imitating
I cant help people who pretend knowledge and make sweeping statements imitating prophets. sorry. this is what baseless faith trains you to do, and why you lie whenever you make such statements.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-02 16:06:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345401080096694277
Reply addressees: @JonahInWales
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345400026546266112
-
To quote any data set one must understand (a) the constitution of what’s in it,
To quote any data set one must understand (a) the constitution of what’s in it, (b) what is NOT in it (c) what is the baseline you’re comparing it against and (d) are they meaningfully comparable.
The excess deaths in 2020 data ~matches up with COVID death claims in 2020. https://twitter.com/jmhorp/status/1345054015265132550
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-01 17:17:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345056567457165314
-
INTENTIONS DON’T MATTER. DUE DILIGENCE DOES. You can intend to lie, you can tran
INTENTIONS DON’T MATTER. DUE DILIGENCE DOES.
You can intend to lie, you can transmit a lie, you can originate or transmit ignorance, error, bias, and deceit that impedes truth, and you can incentivize harm by originating or transmitting ignorance, error, bias, or deceit.
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-01 17:06:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345053840530427905
-
(analogies communicate they do not make arguments unless what is communicated fr
(analogies communicate they do not make arguments unless what is communicated from the example to the context identifies causality and consequence in the context. Otherwise it’s fictitious understanding by conflation, misleading, and often deception despite the speaker’s intent.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-01-01 17:04:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345053383250636802
Reply addressees: @Satinwarp @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345052180009553921