Category: Epistemology and Method

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • I write proofs from first principles. If I can’t write a proof, I can’t claim my

    I write proofs from first principles. If I can’t write a proof, I can’t claim my judgments are true. If I can, then I can. This is what separates people who think they know by accident, from people who do know by discipline. Very, very, very few people work from first principles.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-20 01:22:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351701565074243585

  • SCIENTIFIC = OPERATIONAL, P-Law is operation(real, operational) logic of possibi

    SCIENTIFIC = OPERATIONAL,
    P-Law is operation(real, operational) logic of possibility.

    PHILOSOPHICAL= VERBAL
    Philosophical logic is set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-19 15:27:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351551852907798530

  • SCIENTIFIC LOGIC TERNARY TRUTH TABLE Incoherent, Testifiable, Untestifiable(F) U

    SCIENTIFIC LOGIC
    TERNARY TRUTH TABLE
    Incoherent, Testifiable, Untestifiable(F)
    Undecidable, Possible, Impossible(F)
    Undecidable, Contingent, Inconsistent(F)
    Contingent, Sufficient, Insufficient(F)
    Sufficient(T), Complete(T), Tautological(T)

    Center column = Truth Hierarchy


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-19 15:25:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351551242074533888

  • TERNARY TRUTH TABLE (IMPORTANT) Incoherent, Testifiable, Untestifiable(F) Undeci

    TERNARY TRUTH TABLE (IMPORTANT)
    Incoherent, Testifiable, Untestifiable(F)
    Undecidable, Possible, Impossible(F)
    Undecidable, Contingent, Inconsistent(F)
    Contingent, Sufficient, Insufficient(F)
    Sufficient(T), Complete(T), Tautological(F)

    Center column = Truth Hierarchy


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-19 15:23:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351550891703283713

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351549566273859586


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TruthQuest11 1. It’s not set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference, but operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. Ergo

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1351549566273859586

  • 1. It’s not set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference, but operation(real, operation

    1. It’s not set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference, but operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. Ergo


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-19 15:18:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351549566273859586

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351546509255438340

  • Because it died. IMO it was done with either turing->chomsky or delayed until Kr

    Because it died. IMO it was done with either turing->chomsky or delayed until Kripke.

    truth < unambiguity < law < science < logic < analytic <-> continental > critical theory > marxism > literary > ambiguity > falsehood


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-18 20:15:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351261892644401152

    Reply addressees: @mr_scientism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351248899441389568

  • The Simplicity of the Langauge of Mathematics

    1 – All stimulation begins with sequences of pulses. That’s all nerves and neurons do – measurements of relations. – predicting fragments (of potential referents) 2 – All sequences of pulses produce relations – measurements of relations. = predicting components of objects (potential referents) 3 – All sequences of relations produce spaces, objects, and boundaries – measurements of relations. – predicting the objects (referents) 4 – All bodily actions on spaces, objects, or boundaries require measurements – of relations (possible actions) 5 – All language consists of sets of measurements of constant, contingent, and non-relations between measurements. (it must) 6 – The language of Mathematics consists of the language of commensurability between measurements of constant relations. 7 – The mathematical disciplines consist of systems of measurement for increasingly complex relations (Dimensions) 8 – Statistics is the beginning of the recursive loop the cycle of commensurability of references. 9 – This is why n-body particles (waves) in physics are calculated probabilistically (by quanta). 10 – The limit of mathematics is smaller than the limit of computability (permutation) (some descriptions are constructible, but not predictable, nor deducible.) 11 – Mathematics is the scale-independent, referent independent, language of commensurability between inter-dependent referents in constant relation. 12 – Unfortunately the intuitionistic program failed to reform mathematics into a science (operationalized). 13 – Unfortunately Babbage’s revolution failed, and Cantor, Bohr, and less so Einstien re=platonized mathematics, and math was built on sets (platonic) not operations (scientific). The structure of all language, and of the sub-language of mathematics can be put on a poster just like the periodic table. The archaic terminology replaced with operational terminology and children would find it much easier to learn. Math ‘works’ for constant relations (the physical world) less so for the economic world, and less so for the sentient world, because it’s dead simple. It has one property. “Order in the Sequence”, and every name in the sequence has a unique positional name, so the language of mathematics is closed to conflation, making it an ideal language for measurement. And because it is reference independent, it provides commensurability between referents, and because it is scale-independent it provides scale-independent, arbitrary precision. Math is a very simple thing. A stupid simple thing. it’s not the language of math itself that’s complicated. It’s that deducing increasingly complex measurements with that language is increasingly difficult unless you can learn to imagine mathematical structures in your mind by repetition.

  • The Simplicity of the Langauge of Mathematics

    1 – All stimulation begins with sequences of pulses. That’s all nerves and neurons do – measurements of relations. – predicting fragments (of potential referents) 2 – All sequences of pulses produce relations – measurements of relations. = predicting components of objects (potential referents) 3 – All sequences of relations produce spaces, objects, and boundaries – measurements of relations. – predicting the objects (referents) 4 – All bodily actions on spaces, objects, or boundaries require measurements – of relations (possible actions) 5 – All language consists of sets of measurements of constant, contingent, and non-relations between measurements. (it must) 6 – The language of Mathematics consists of the language of commensurability between measurements of constant relations. 7 – The mathematical disciplines consist of systems of measurement for increasingly complex relations (Dimensions) 8 – Statistics is the beginning of the recursive loop the cycle of commensurability of references. 9 – This is why n-body particles (waves) in physics are calculated probabilistically (by quanta). 10 – The limit of mathematics is smaller than the limit of computability (permutation) (some descriptions are constructible, but not predictable, nor deducible.) 11 – Mathematics is the scale-independent, referent independent, language of commensurability between inter-dependent referents in constant relation. 12 – Unfortunately the intuitionistic program failed to reform mathematics into a science (operationalized). 13 – Unfortunately Babbage’s revolution failed, and Cantor, Bohr, and less so Einstien re=platonized mathematics, and math was built on sets (platonic) not operations (scientific). The structure of all language, and of the sub-language of mathematics can be put on a poster just like the periodic table. The archaic terminology replaced with operational terminology and children would find it much easier to learn. Math ‘works’ for constant relations (the physical world) less so for the economic world, and less so for the sentient world, because it’s dead simple. It has one property. “Order in the Sequence”, and every name in the sequence has a unique positional name, so the language of mathematics is closed to conflation, making it an ideal language for measurement. And because it is reference independent, it provides commensurability between referents, and because it is scale-independent it provides scale-independent, arbitrary precision. Math is a very simple thing. A stupid simple thing. it’s not the language of math itself that’s complicated. It’s that deducing increasingly complex measurements with that language is increasingly difficult unless you can learn to imagine mathematical structures in your mind by repetition.