Q Curt: “Do you believe in private language?” 1. Well, like in many things Wittgenstein was a pre-scientific thinker trying to make a scientific argument. However (a) all language consists of measurements, (b) normative language seeks a standard of weights and measures, (c) science seeks to produce the most precise measures. 2. (d) each of us uses language that is only as precise as our skill with that set of measurements. (e) because in the absence of common experience, common measures, common skill with those measures, we diverge in our individual weights and measures. 3. However, human Sense (sensations), Perception (modeling), Auto-Association, and Prediction (imagination), vary by the weights (values) we attribute to SPAA,Pr. So we speak in different combinations of weights and measures seeking approximations of one another measures. 4. In this sense, “private language” is a term for the Ignorance>Knowledge>Skill spectrum. In other words he’s trying to legitimize a falsehood: Pseudoscience. 5. Conversely, yes we do think, speak, and act using different but not incompatible weights and measures. ๐
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
4. In this sense, “private language” is a term for the Ignorance>Knowledge>Skill
4. In this sense, “private language” is a term for the Ignorance>Knowledge>Skill spectrum. In other words he’s trying to legitimize a falsehood: Pseudoscience.
5. Conversely, yes we do think, speak, and act using different but not incompatible weights and measures. ๐
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-28 16:53:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420427246645428235
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420417951337893891
-
3. However, human Sense (sensations), Perception (modeling), Auto-Association, a
3. However, human Sense (sensations), Perception (modeling), Auto-Association, and Prediction (imagination), varies by the weights (values) we attribute to SPAA,Pr. So we speak in different combinations of weights and measures seeking approximations of one another measures.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-28 16:51:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420426596033388553
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420417951337893891
-
2. (d) each of us uses language that is only as precise as our skill with that s
2. (d) each of us uses language that is only as precise as our skill with that set of measurements. (e) because in the absence of common experience, common measures, common skill with those measures, we diverge in our individual weights and measures.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-28 16:47:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420425722091474948
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420425262085386243
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@FedorLives1889 1. Well, like in many things Wittgenstein was a pre-scientific thinker trying to make a scientific argument. However (a) all language consists of measurements, (b) normative language seeks a standard of weights and measures, (c) science seeks to produce the most precise measures.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1420425262085386243
-
1. Well, like in many things Wittgenstein was a pre-scientific thinker trying to
1. Well, like in many things Wittgenstein was a pre-scientific thinker trying to make a scientific argument. However (a) all language consists of measurements, (b) normative language seeks a standard of weights and measures, (c) science seeks to produce the most precise measures.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-28 16:45:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420425262085386243
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420417951337893891
-
P-Science, Logic, and Law doesn’t lend it self to sequential education because s
P-Science, Logic, and Law doesn’t lend it self to sequential education because so much is dependent on other topics. While the central premise is painfully simple, and we’ve orgnized the content sequentially, it’s still a challenge. (Where do I include ‘the family’ for example?)
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-27 16:04:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1420052442419449860
-
We confuse Meaning with Understanding, Utility, Agreement, and Truth: -Meaning:
We confuse Meaning with Understanding, Utility, Agreement, and Truth:
-Meaning: Conveyance by Analogy
-Understanding: Integration of Meaning into our frame of reference
-Utility: The utility in that understanding
-Agreement: the preference in it
-Truth: whether I like it or not
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-26 17:04:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1419705076046876677
-
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Each successive interpretive model reduces the burden of comp
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Each successive interpretive model reduces the burden of complexity via abstraction. In their healthy forms, this allowsโฆ
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-25 17:55:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1419355544981278732
-
I try to avoid the topic of covid and the vaccine because I can’t really contrib
I try to avoid the topic of covid and the vaccine because I can’t really contribute ‘decidability’ to the conversation, and I don’t see any public misunderstanding, and that this example illustrates herd vs pack behavior expressed at civ level.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-25 03:02:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1419130923547758593
Reply addressees: @bot3685
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1419118391646851073
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-25 02:20:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1419120445073281034
Reply addressees: @scenichypothes1 @realComancheTod
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1419094161966260229