Clip: Difficulty in Understanding Universal Unification
https://youtu.be/DF-C8fDSGTk
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-27 18:58:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1442564290494427139
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
Clip: Difficulty in Understanding Universal Unification
-
September 26th Chat Topics: Epistemic instrumentation
September 26th Chat Topics: Epistemic instrumentation
https://youtu.be/ilh480VIl44
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-26 19:58:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1442216983970279424
-
So if you start from the HARD problem – and yes, these problems exist beyond the
So if you start from the HARD problem – and yes, these problems exist beyond the limits of mathematics – you start with knowing what’s wrong with mathematics, and how what’s wrong with mathematics affects physics and all that derives from it. (a lot). https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1441913763104362498
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-25 23:59:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1441915169945260044
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1441913763104362498
-
The difference say, with Deutsch is minor (many worlds) or with Dawkins (determi
The difference say, with Deutsch is minor (many worlds) or with Dawkins (determinism, computation), or Popper (falsification, costs). But if you add Hayek (information) and Becker (supply demand), and my work on grammars (human calculation) then you falsify the math & physicists. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1441913763104362498
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-25 23:57:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1441914784698535945
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1441913763104362498
-
Well, I would say that’s the same thing. The purpose of science is to discover h
Well, I would say that’s the same thing. The purpose of science is to discover how to reform our ontology(paradigms, metaphysics, logic) and vocabulary. and that the only emaining function of philosophers is to do that. And rules, literature, myth, for the ‘slow kids’
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-22 22:53:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440811600013709314
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1440804377057378306
-
Another deceit. We discover truth. We communicate with meaning We create analogi
Another deceit.
We discover truth.
We communicate with meaning
We create analogies, fictions, and deceits.
The difference is incentive.
The incentive to lie.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 15:58:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439982307398635526
Reply addressees: @Reciproperty @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439979705529155588
-
I don’t use proof. I use falsification. Claims of “proof” are lying. We don’t ‘p
I don’t use proof. I use falsification. Claims of “proof” are lying. We don’t ‘prove’ anything is true. We remove doubt that alternatives are true. Ergo, a process of elimination What you mean by ‘proof’ is justification which itself is a technique of deceit.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 15:37:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439977050975133698
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439976067729526791
-
The answer is exhaustive falsification. I’ve used adversarial falsifiction on ev
The answer is exhaustive falsification. I’ve used adversarial falsifiction on every single scientific discipline in order to discover the first principles that are common to all disciplines. That first principle turns out to be relatively simple. It’s just undesirable.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 15:25:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439974003821760513
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439972517108535300
-
How do you ask a logical question without the prior of logic, and what does logi
How do you ask a logical question without the prior of logic, and what does logic consist of if it’s a prior. You can’t even ask me that question unless you grant that I can rely on logic.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 15:24:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439973691266375687
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439972517108535300
-
There is no exception to the rule, and there can be no exception to the rule. Yo
There is no exception to the rule, and there can be no exception to the rule. You are welcome to test the rule by trying to find an exception. You are not welcome to use feminine, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Pilpul (deceit) to claim there is any other test than falsification.
Source date (UTC): 2021-09-20 14:58:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439967133547606023
Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1439966334951968768