The Reason For Technical Verbosity 😉 https://t.co/Ji5jRoSooL
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:42:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456315951209754630
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
THE VERBOSITY OF THE ONLY WAY TO BE SURE — “I agree with your assessment. But,
THE VERBOSITY OF THE ONLY WAY TO BE SURE
— “I agree with your assessment. But, could you make it more concise? I just finished shaving when I started reading your post. By the time I finished it, I had a five o’clock shadow!” — elsewhere
Sorry boss. I make my notes in YT comments as I listen to the video, then copy them to my archive and riff off them for a while.
Unfortunately, there is a reason we speak in normative and moral prose: it’s cheap. There is also a reason we speak in logical, scientific, and economic prose – despite that it’s expensive.
That cost is how we falsify normative and moral prose. “It’s the only way to be sure” so to speak.
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:40:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107220017176329342
-
RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle @EricLiford Hayek pointed out that convergen
RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle @EricLiford Hayek pointed out that convergence on ambiguous goals results in a lack of decidability whe…
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:42:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456300747218358273
-
The duty of bots that seek truth (decidability) regardless of cost, from which t
The duty of bots that seek truth (decidability) regardless of cost, from which to make choices that account for all costs, is to limit the other bots from imposing high costs by the good intentions but poor accounting of costs by those other bots. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:35:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456299151394811917
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456298640474058760
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I would like us to get to where we understand that we’re all bots and it’s just that there are very few of us who are bots that seek truth (decidability) regardless of cost, from which to make choices that account for ALL costs.
We’re right, sure – but we’re bots too. 😉Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456298640474058760
-
I would like us to get to where we understand that we’re all bots and it’s just
I would like us to get to where we understand that we’re all bots and it’s just that there are very few of us who are bots that seek truth (decidability) regardless of cost, from which to make choices that account for ALL costs.
We’re right, sure – but we’re bots too. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:33:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456298640474058760
-
The problem producing P is that I used the public as research subjects, in searc
The problem producing P is that I used the public as research subjects, in search for first principles, which is a very technical methodology and resulting science and logic. Yet what people CARE ABOUT is policy changes. They emphasize politics as substitute for POLICY solutions.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 16:21:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456295589721825282
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456293181910355973
-
WHY VOTING DATA IS ALWAYS PSEUDOSCIENCE: Regarding: WHITE WOMEN COLLEGE GRADS VA
WHY VOTING DATA IS ALWAYS PSEUDOSCIENCE:
Regarding:WHITE WOMEN COLLEGE GRADS
VA 2020: 58% Biden, 41% Trump
VA 2021: 62% McAuliffe, 38% YoungkinWHITE WOMEN NON-COLLEGE
VA 2020: 56% Trump, 44% Biden
VA 2021: 75% Youngkin, 25% McAuliffe- Most female degrees are non-stem, low-wage (education, psychology, sociology, or worse)
- As such Education(EA) is not a proxy for IQ or political competency in females as it might be for males.
- The only useful data is sorted by population density, income, marital status, children, and age. Why? Women are more motivated by temporal incentives and social (herd) pressure than males, who do not vary in political affiliation, except with age.
- With 2/3 population committed:1/3 conservative(male capitalizing) or 1/3 progressive (female hyper-consumptive), and females the only racial asymmetry, all elections with less than 6% difference are determined by low-information female voters influenced by friend networks and “likability”.
- These are well-known facts in the social sciences, especially among political economists. The ‘gated institutional narrative’ always and everywhere attempts to attribute more value to statistics than exist. Like the stock market, the voting market is almost entirely noise.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 21:04:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107215157140938237
- Most female degrees are non-stem, low-wage (education, psychology, sociology, or worse)
-
WHY THIS DATA IS ALWAYS PSEUDOSCIENCE: 1) Most female degrees are non-stem, low-
WHY THIS DATA IS ALWAYS PSEUDOSCIENCE:
1) Most female degrees are non-stem, low-wage (education, psychology, sociology, or worse)
2) Education(EA) is not a proxy for IQ in females
3) The only useful data is sorted by population density, income, marital status, children, and age
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 20:55:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456002199998418945
Reply addressees: @sahilkapur @NBCNews
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455722698689196033
-
Close but backward. To produce scale and context independence in order to create
Close but backward. To produce scale and context independence in order to create general rules of arbitrary precision and context we ignore time, scale, context, ops, and cost. Transform math from from a science to a logic removing constraints.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 20:31:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455996007859245059
Reply addressees: @TwiceBlind @hoeberian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455987705842585601
-
So this is the most basic example of why I describe The Grammars as defined by a
So this is the most basic example of why I describe The Grammars as defined by adding or removing dimensions (constraints). Ideal Math = w/o Context, operational math = with Context. Ideal math uses infinity (next integer value) as the arbitrary limit if otherwise unspecified.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 19:04:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455974178033741825
Reply addressees: @TwiceBlind @hoeberian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455973649429716997
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TwiceBlind @hoeberian Secondly, mathematical deduction relies on the law of the excluded middle, and the arbitrary declaration of limits of precision, to compensate for scale independence caused by the absence of context that otherwise supplies a limit of precision.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1455973649429716997