THE SIX ADVANCEMENTS IN KNOWLEDGE NOT INCORPORATED INTO PHILOSOPHY
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1580209169822814208.html
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 15:38:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580221453441519617
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
THE SIX ADVANCEMENTS IN KNOWLEDGE NOT INCORPORATED INTO PHILOSOPHY
-
26/n As such, that is the great, singular, open question of Philosophy. It’s one
26/n As such, that is the great, singular, open question of Philosophy. It’s one that science and logic cannot answer. 😉
-Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:55:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580210487936962561
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580210313219432453
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
25/n And so closure is visible on the horizon. And when that happens -and it’s in the process of happening – what will man do without mystery that provides relief from the limits of reality -and instead is limited to overcoming the limits of reality,with all the effort entailed?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580210313219432453
-
24/n But for those with the will, and the intellectual honesty, you will discove
24/n But for those with the will, and the intellectual honesty, you will discover that philosophy, which previously consisted of developing paradigms of decidability and choice in a domain, has now been disambiguated fully from science, logic, and law.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:52:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209833261043713
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209229784174592
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
23/n If you want to understand more, then follow me (us). It appears to take about the same amount of time as a STEM degree to understand all of the above. And because like many scientific discoveries, it slaughters our most sacred individual and cultural cows without mercy.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580209229784174592
-
22/n Now, do I expect many people to follow this chain of reasoning, condensed t
22/n Now, do I expect many people to follow this chain of reasoning, condensed to a handful of tweets? Hmmm not really. But it is a framework for discussion that will always and everywhere result in confirming each of those six points. And via that evidence, my argument.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:50:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209227217321985
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209224537473027
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
21/n In closing, it may not be clear that this means that just as there is applied chemistry to be discovered but the periodic table of states and operations is all but complete, that the formal logic of all states and operations at all scales is complete. Decidability exists.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580209224537473027
-
12/n Ergo the permissiveness of philosophy and theology that are open to use for
12/n Ergo the permissiveness of philosophy and theology that are open to use for deception is eliminated via grammatical closure (more elsewhere if this is too much of a leap for you.)
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:50:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209200227307521
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209197995917318
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
11/n And that formal logic in that formal language now assist us in disambiguating the efficiency of informal language as a means of transferring meaning by suggestion, into truthful and erroneous, biased, untruthful, deceptive, fraudulent, and criminal speech.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580209197995917318
-
11/n And that formal logic in that formal language now assist us in disambiguati
11/n And that formal logic in that formal language now assist us in disambiguating the efficiency of informal language as a means of transferring meaning by suggestion, into truthful and erroneous, biased, untruthful, deceptive, fraudulent, and criminal speech.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:50:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209197995917318
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209195345137665
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
10/n And that formal language must consist of subjectively testable vocabulary and logic that are reducible to analogy to possibilities of human experience: physical, logical, and yes, even emotional. Because our faculties are our only system of measuring consistency: logic.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580209195345137665
-
10/n And that formal language must consist of subjectively testable vocabulary a
10/n And that formal language must consist of subjectively testable vocabulary and logic that are reducible to analogy to possibilities of human experience: physical, logical, and yes, even emotional. Because our faculties are our only system of measuring consistency: logic.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:50:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209195345137665
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209192862101504
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
9/n As such, b/c the law of grammar, and the law of the universe are identical, then by market competition for disambiguation, (verisimilitude), we gradually discover the most parsimonious formal (operational), paradigm, grammar, logic, vocabulary, and syntax: language of truth.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580209192862101504
-
9/n As such, b/c the law of grammar, and the law of the universe are identical,
9/n As such, b/c the law of grammar, and the law of the universe are identical, then by market competition for disambiguation, (verisimilitude), we gradually discover the most parsimonious formal (operational), paradigm, grammar, logic, vocabulary, and syntax: language of truth.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:50:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209192862101504
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209190110318592
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
8/n We refer to each stage of the sequence of stable relations and operations as a ‘discipline’ of the sciences – or at least have tended to, can, and following the law of disambiguation, should, at least for our own subsequent good.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580209190110318592
-
4/n Addendum (Goodbye to philosophical word games. There are no more paradoxes,
4/n Addendum (Goodbye to philosophical word games. There are no more paradoxes, only bad grammar, constructed for purposes of deception by suggestion. So goodbye to all pretense of profundity in Philosophy. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:50:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209179565780993
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209177028272129
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4/n Third, the first rule of grammar consists in the requirement for “Continuous recursive disambiguation to the limit of ambiguity called identity”. This constitutes the law of formality in any logic, from common idiomatic to colloquial to formal writing, to formal logic.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580209177028272129
-
4/n Third, the first rule of grammar consists in the requirement for “Continuous
4/n Third, the first rule of grammar consists in the requirement for “Continuous recursive disambiguation to the limit of ambiguity called identity”. This constitutes the law of formality in any logic, from common idiomatic to colloquial to formal writing, to formal logic.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-12 14:50:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209177028272129
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1580209174495268864
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
3/n Second, the change from non-causal set logic to causal supply-demand logic. And subsequently the change of terms for concepts from sets (ideals) to spectra: measurements (reals).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1580209174495268864