Category: Epistemology and Method

  • RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”– RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN

    RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”–
    RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1638602036370456576

    1) a) all logic is falsificationary: proofs test survival. b) we learn about the universe through incremental removal of human error. c) All human error originates…


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    1. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
    2. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm).
    3. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
    4. The search for positive law of thou shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of though shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
    5. The search for the good instead of the true, from which we choose possible goods.
    6. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.

    Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.

    “NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1638602036370456576

  • TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT (V2. Added Four.) 1. The search for i

    TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    (V2. Added Four.)
    1. The search for ideal truth rather than incrementally testifiable (performative) truth. (Failing to grasp truth in general).
    2. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
    3. The failure to distinquish between the reducibility of laws to math (before, physical, statistics), computation (during, behavioral, operations, operationalism) and simulation (after, evolutionary, survivals, supply-demand, economics), and the spectrum of rules of disambiguation (grammars, paradigms) we use to describe them. (In general the problem of ‘mathiness’, especially in physics.)
    4. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm), by the first principle of evolutionary computation.
    5. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
    6. The search for the good instead of the true, not-false, possible, and not-irreciprocal, from which we choose possible recirpocal goods.
    7. The search for positive law of thou-shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of thou-shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
    8. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.
    9. The search for a static political model rather than an adaptive political model for conditions of war, vs going concern, vs windfalls, and how to transition between them as needed.
    10. The search for a single uniform economy rather than a hierarchy of economies suiting the capacity of rsponsibilty of individuals and groups.

    Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.

    “NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 22:06:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638663444068028417

  • TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT (V2. Added Four.) 1. The search for i

    TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    (V2. Added Four.)
    1. The search for ideal truth rather than incrementally testifiable (performative) truth. (Failing to grasp truth in general).
    2. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
    3. The failure to distinquish between the reducibility of laws to math (before, physical, statistics), computation (during, behavioral, operations, operationalism) and simulation (after, evolutionary, survivals, supply-demand, economics), and the spectrum of rules of disambiguation (grammars, paradigms) we use to describe them. (In general the problem of ‘mathiness’, especially in physics.)
    4. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm), by the first principle of evolutionary computation.
    5. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
    6. The search for the good instead of the true, not-false, possible, and not-irreciprocal, from which we choose possible recirpocal goods.
    7. The search for positive law of thou-shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of thou-shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
    8. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.
    9. The search for a static political model rather than an adaptive political model for conditions of war, vs going concern, vs windfalls, and how to transition between them as needed.
    10. The search for a single uniform economy rather than a hierarchy of economies suiting the capacity of rsponsibilty of individuals and groups.

    Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.

    “NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 22:06:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638663443858202624

  • RT @curtdoolittle: Mankind faces the end of mystery limiting us to the merely un

    RT @curtdoolittle: Mankind faces the end of mystery limiting us to the merely unknown. And with that end of mystery comes the necessity of…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 19:21:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638621928893063200

  • SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT 1. The search for justification(proof

    SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    1. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
    2. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm).
    3. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
    4. The search for positive law of thou shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of though shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
    5. The search for the good instead of the true, from which we choose possible goods.
    6. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.

    Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.

    “NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 18:02:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638602036370456576

  • SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT 1. The search for justification(proof

    SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    1. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
    2. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm).
    3. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
    4. The search for positive law of thou shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of though shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
    5. The search for the good instead of the true, from which we choose possible goods.
    6. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.

    Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.

    “NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 18:02:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638602036215160840

  • WHY RELY ON PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY (NONSENSE)? Now, I have a rather deep questi

    WHY RELY ON PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY (NONSENSE)?

    Now, I have a rather deep question for y’all?

    Why, if simulation, computation, operational logic of causality, the laws of cooperation, the laws of the universe they evolved from, the science of producing testimony that assists us… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1637910086780612609


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 20:37:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637916236842401793

  • CURT: “WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THE EVOLUTION OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES? MAN AS THE MEA

    CURT: “WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THE EVOLUTION OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES? MAN AS THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS TO MAN? OR VITRUVIANISM?”

    I’m trying to draw attention to the rather obvious progress of our minds and words as measurements that begin with what’s available to us at birth, and what we evolved over the millennia to COMPENSATE for the lack of precision in the measurements of our birth. 😉

    EVOLUTION:
    Existential Reality
    Nervous System (sensing vibrations – change)
    Embodiment (human subjectively testable weights and measures)
    Anthropomorphism (applied human weights and measures)
    Mythology (Lessons by suggestion)
    Religion (Standards of weights and measures)
    Dialectic (agreement (not truth))
    Laws (Standards of Weights and Measures)
    Testimony (Truth (not agreement))
    Reason (Adversarialism, Sets)
    Philosophy (Plato, Idealism, Analogies, Abstractions)
    Natural Philosophy (Observations)
    History (Evidence)
    Empiricism (measurements)
    Science (mathematics)
    Evolutionary Computation (computation)
    Simulation (Simulation by evolutionary competition)
    Existential Reality (identity)
    And… We’re done.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 20:12:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637910086780612609

  • CURT: “WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THE EVOLUTION OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES? MAN AS THE MEA

    CURT: “WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THE EVOLUTION OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES? MAN AS THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS TO MAN? OR VITRUVIANISM?”

    I’m trying to draw attention to the rather obvious progress of our minds and words as measurements that begin with what’s available to us at birth, and what we evolved over the millennia to COMPENSATE for the lack of precision in the measurements of our birth. 😉

    EVOLUTION:
    Existential Reality
    Nervous System (sensing vibrations – change)
    Embodiment (human subjectively testable weights and measures)
    Anthropomorphism (applied human weights and measures)
    Mythology (Lessons by suggestion)
    Religion (Standards of weights and measures)
    Dialectic (agreement (not truth))
    Laws (Standards of Weights and Measures)
    Testimony (Truth (not agreement))
    Reason (Adversarialism, Sets)
    Philosophy (Plato, Idealism, Analogies, Abstractions)
    Natural Philosophy (Observations)
    History (Evidence)
    Empiricism (measurements)
    Science (mathematics)
    Evolutionary Computation (computation)
    Simulation (Simulation by evolutionary competition)
    Existential Reality (identity)
    And… We’re done.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 20:12:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637910086671581187

  • You’d have to demonstrate that case rather than assert it (lying) without argume

    You’d have to demonstrate that case rather than assert it (lying) without argument (fraud), using the pretense of knowledge (fraud). You will be hard-pressed to find anyone with greater cross-disciplinary knowledge than I do. I know. I try.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 15:09:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637833845058727937

    Reply addressees: @GoodTexture @MrWarrenBuffet @whatifalthist @elonmusk

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637831892324974592