The 20th Century will be remembered in intellectual history as an era of mysticism, pseudoscience, innumeracy, propaganda and deceit. #tcot
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 14:56:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627855422129635328
The 20th Century will be remembered in intellectual history as an era of mysticism, pseudoscience, innumeracy, propaganda and deceit. #tcot
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-02 14:56:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/627855422129635328
(verbalism)(deception)(theft)(predation) [T]he misuse of the word “we” imposes costs upon others, since it is a form of deception that is to distract us from actions of predation and theft. Most frequently, the deceptive use of the word “we” is employed in the political sphere, in the west, is to further violate property en toto under the pretense of equality of interest. It’s a verbal parlor trick for the purpose of theft. It’s chicanery. –William Benge
(verbalism)(deception)(theft)(predation) [T]he misuse of the word “we” imposes costs upon others, since it is a form of deception that is to distract us from actions of predation and theft. Most frequently, the deceptive use of the word “we” is employed in the political sphere, in the west, is to further violate property en toto under the pretense of equality of interest. It’s a verbal parlor trick for the purpose of theft. It’s chicanery. –William Benge
(draft) (learning propertarianism) [T]he subtle differences in terms of comparison. DEFINITIONS:
(draft) (learning propertarianism) [T]he subtle differences in terms of comparison. DEFINITIONS:
[F]alsification (Limits) tells us what is true. Confirmation is often comforting lie.
Heroin feels good. Many drugs feel good. Beer and chips and soccer feel good. Democracy feels good. Security feels good. But many things that feel good are not in fact good. Comforting lies are suicidal.
Our feelings evolved in response to scarcity. Bread feels good tastes good and smells good (carbs). Sugar tastes good. Milk tastes good (fat).
Almost all scarce things are good when scarce. They are less than good as staples.
Our senses have not adapted to overabundance. We do not sense the harm of abundance. Our daily meals are feasts. We live in a world of feasting (consumption ) in every capacity.
It’s no wonder our senses fail us.
[F]alsification (Limits) tells us what is true. Confirmation is often comforting lie.
Heroin feels good. Many drugs feel good. Beer and chips and soccer feel good. Democracy feels good. Security feels good. But many things that feel good are not in fact good. Comforting lies are suicidal.
Our feelings evolved in response to scarcity. Bread feels good tastes good and smells good (carbs). Sugar tastes good. Milk tastes good (fat).
Almost all scarce things are good when scarce. They are less than good as staples.
Our senses have not adapted to overabundance. We do not sense the harm of abundance. Our daily meals are feasts. We live in a world of feasting (consumption ) in every capacity.
It’s no wonder our senses fail us.
[S]trict construction merely makes it very hard to err, bias, and deceive: it’s a process of falsification. A test. What survives the test is a truth candidate.
I’m not arrogant when I say that there is one category of philosophy prior to Propertarianism, and on category of philosophy after. Justificationism is now dead if it wasn’t dead becasue of Popper.
And the reason I’m merging philosophy with science, and destroying rationalism is simple: philosophy has been used largely to lie.
End Lying Into The Commons.
[S]trict construction merely makes it very hard to err, bias, and deceive: it’s a process of falsification. A test. What survives the test is a truth candidate.
I’m not arrogant when I say that there is one category of philosophy prior to Propertarianism, and on category of philosophy after. Justificationism is now dead if it wasn’t dead becasue of Popper.
And the reason I’m merging philosophy with science, and destroying rationalism is simple: philosophy has been used largely to lie.
End Lying Into The Commons.
(learning propertarianism)
[W]hat does Decidable mean?
REVERSE: In logic we state that a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice). In other words, if the sufficient information for the decision is present within the system (ie: is decidable).
OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary).
Or in simple terms, if DISCRETION is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable.
This separates reason (or calculation in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm).