Category: Epistemology and Method

  • Rhetorical Fallacy. Insufficient action is indistinguishable from no action. Int

    Rhetorical Fallacy. Insufficient action is indistinguishable from no action. Intentions are irrelevant vs results.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 21:22:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665641046987153409

    Reply addressees: @CptTibbs @JulieBorowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665640307439116288


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665640307439116288

  • Yeah. Today I would just call the fellow a liar and protect the informational co

    Yeah. Today I would just call the fellow a liar and protect the informational commons from him. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 21:10:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665637994917965824

    Reply addressees: @JohnRandom1234

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665637103162621952


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665637103162621952

  • There is no more reason we should fear teaching testimonialism’s extension of th

    There is no more reason we should fear teaching testimonialism’s extension of the scientific method, than we fear teaching grammar, rhetoric, or newtonian physics. Because unlike mathematics, chemistry, and post-newtonian physics, testimony is a property of perceptions, experiences and limitations – not something that we cannot directly grasp.

    1) TESTIMONIALISM

    Experience (filling your mind)

    Creativity (free association)

    Hypothesis

    Identity (property, method, relation, and category)

    Internal Consistency (logic)

    External Correspondence (experiment)

    Existential Possibility (operationalism)

    Morality (fully informed voluntary exchange free of negative externality)

    Limits (falsification)

    Parsimony

    Evolution of Truthfulness (epistemology):

    Experience,

    Free Association,

    Hypothesis,

    Theory,

    Law,

    Truth,

    Tautology

    2) PROPERTARIANISM:

    Morality: The necessity of cooperation: natural law: necessary for the construction of the voluntary organization of demand, invention, production, distribution and trade, and the formation of prices and incentives which inform our actions in the service of one another.

    The basis of natural law of voluntary cooperation and the construction of the voluntary organization of production: The Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary exchange, of property-en-toto, free of imposition of costs by externality.

    3) PROPERTY EN TOTO (Demonstrated Property)

    I. SELF-PROPERTY

    Personal property: β€œThings an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”

    ….a) Physical Body

    ….b) Actions and Time

    ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands.

    ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.)

    II. PERSONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over.

    III. KINSHIP PROPERTY

    ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction)

    ….b) Children (genetics)

    ….c) Familial Relations (security)

    ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility)

    ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)

    IV. COOPERATIVE PROPERTY

    ….a) Organizational ties (work)

    ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)

    V. SHAREHOLDER PROPERTY

    ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset)

    VI. COMMON PROPERTY

    ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons)

    ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.

    VII. COMMON INFORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY:

    ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.

    VIII. COMMON FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws.

    3.2) Categories of Property, Rights and Oblications:

    0) Non-Property (Bring under total control)

    ….CONTROL: Total Control

    ….PURPOSE: Create Property

    ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus.

    1) Personal (Private) Property (limited control)

    ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption

    ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio,

    ….MAYBE: Abusus

    2) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control)

    ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control

    ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation

    ….YES: Fructus

    ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio,

    ….NO: Abusus

    3) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders)

    ….CONTROL: No control.

    ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption.

    ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus,

    ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus

    4) RIGHTS

    1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation.

    2) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space.

    3) Usus – Use: setting up a stall.

    4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits)

    5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer)

    6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo.

    5) OBLIGATIONS

    1) Non-Imposition : Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto, Free of External Imposition of Costs against Property-en-toto.

    6) LAW, JUDGE AND JURY

    (obvious)Law is discovered by judges as the incremental suppression of parasitism that violates property en toto. While government may produce commons and it may construct contracts, all law must be discovered.

    7) MONARCH(JUDGE), HOUSES (MARKETS), ADVOCATES (CITIZENS)

    Decidability: Equidistribution of proceeds to houses. Economic Investment as ‘voting’. Legal Dissent prevents passage. Otherwise all legal contracts are binding.

    Houses, chosen by lot, 90 days on. 90 days off:

    7.1) Judge: The Monarchy, Judiciary

    7.2) Force: Military, Sheriffs and Militia

    7.3) Production and Property: Treasury, Finance and Banking, Entrepreneurs, Professionals, Employers of non relations.

    7.4) Reproduction, Consumption, and Insurance: Race, Nation, Tribe, Clan, Family, Individual

    The House-out-of-House.

    7.5) Gossip: Academics, Intellectuals, and media.

    – may not participate.

    – must speak truthfully (warranty)

    8) WILSONIAN SYNTHESIS: LAW, MORALITY, PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE(TRUTH TELLING)

    1) Morality: preservation of the disproportionate rewards of cooperation by a total prohibition on imposition of costs against property-en-toto.

    2) Law: an evolutionary list of the accumulated prohibitions on innovations in the means of immoral actions: impositions of costs on property en toto.

    3) Property Rights: The promise that third parties will warranty restitution and retaliation, and not retaliate for restitution and retaliation, for imposition of costs against property en toto in exchange for the same warranty from the defending party or parties.

    4) Science: the discipline(technology) of laundering imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deception from testimony, leaving only truth candidates.

    5) Philosophy: The discipline(technology) of improving truthful testimony.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 06:37:00 UTC

  • Learn to debate honestly. Don’t play redefinition games

    Learn to debate honestly. Don’t play redefinition games.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 22:13:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291522292752384

    Reply addressees: @RiverC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291122189737984


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291122189737984

  • Block me because it is a moral obligation for a moral man to cleans the commons

    Block me because it is a moral obligation for a moral man to cleans the commons of the pollution of fallacy and deception.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 22:13:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291462351917057

    Reply addressees: @RiverC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291122189737984


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665291122189737984

  • Objective truth exists independent of preference in matters of conflict

    Objective truth exists independent of preference in matters of conflict.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 21:53:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665286305463574528

    Reply addressees: @no_hybrys

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665285846015352833


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665285846015352833

  • that is a nonsense statement. If it can be decidable it is decidable. The subjec

    that is a nonsense statement. If it can be decidable it is decidable. The subjective preference is only in internal choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 21:52:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665286235041198080

    Reply addressees: @no_hybrys

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665285846015352833


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665285846015352833

  • You tell me. I just construct proofs. It’s the only way to end the lies. πŸ˜‰

    You tell me. I just construct proofs. It’s the only way to end the lies. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 17:59:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665227458980012032

    Reply addressees: @RiverC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665226887871004672


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665226887871004672

  • If one starts with false premises one has difficulty reasoning true conclusions.

    If one starts with false premises one has difficulty reasoning true conclusions. Most start with false premises purposefully.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 17:31:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665220411299397633

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665219842367209473


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    The first question of ethics is why don’t I kill you and take your land, women, and things – not assuming cooperation as the starting point.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/665219842367209473


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    The first question of ethics is why don’t I kill you and take your land, women, and things – not assuming cooperation as the starting point.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/665219842367209473

  • constants (types of property), variables (possessions, information available), o

    constants (types of property), variables (possessions, information available), operations (rational actions), functions (institutions).


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-13 13:09:00 UTC