Category: Epistemology and Method

Once someone has established they engage in magical and justificationary thinking, the practice of pilpul and critique, respond with intellectual dishonesty, and worse, demonstrated that they can’t identify, dismiss, or deliberately ignore the pattern between their words and others’ criticism of it, that individual is irredeemable, and all investment is sunk cost. Because instinc-bots, addicts, and criminals do not reform until they have no other choice.

Simple questions from existing exchanges:
(a) Are you denying the existence of your recent article (post) on conservatism?
(b) Are you able to reduce your own bias to first cuases such that you can compare your presumptions with the opposition’s presumptions?
(c) Are you ignoring the criticism of your use of the feminine > abrahamic > leftist method of undermining and virtue signaling in lieu of argument, or are you just unaware of the differences between the systematic and empirical method of masculine and european criticism and the empathic and social method of feminine and abrahamic criticism?
(d) Why did you evade the sex differences in cognition as the origin of interpersonal, moral, and political bias? And claim I had no specific criticism?
(e) If you are so unaware of the scientific and logical foundations of your own and others bias and understanding, then why are you even vaguely fit to comment on it as other than gossip? (You are, because that’s what you’re doing. Using feminine GSRRM – gossip.

Because that’s all you are capable of.

1. If you were intellectualy capable you would recognize the patterns betwen the arguments I’m making and your writing.
2. If you were intellectually informed you would respond with specific questions that illustrated your understanding (you haven’t).
3. If you were intellectually honest as well, then you would seek to understand rather than object.

So you have failed all three tests of capacity, knowledge, and honesty. Why should I or anyone else take you as anything other than seeking attention to confirm your bias, create a false self image, and a pretense of ability and status, by your act of calling the science you are ignorant of ‘esoteric’ rather than your own work as consisting of nothing more than atention seeking conformity and populist drivel?

Adulthood is seeking to do precisely the opposite of every behavior you are demonstrating. The purpose of governing by demonstrated competency instead of credentialism is precisely to prevent your kind of folly from being politically imposed upon others who are, quite opposite from you, competent and moral.

Cheers

Reply addressees: @jcallahanbryant @Thaeus4