Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • Do Governments Create Wealth And Jobs For Its Citizens?

    THE COMPLETE AND CORRECT ANSWER.

    —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citizens?”—-


    First, let’s understand some terms to make sure we know what we’re talking about.

    SERIES: Defense > Rule > Government > Bureaucracy (monopoly) > Institutions (anonymous cooperation at scale) > Markets (speculation, investment, production, distribution, trade) > Norms (friction reduction) > Truth Telling (friction reduction) > Trust (risk taking) > Economic Velocity > Social Order.

    DEFINITIONS:

    – Defense (producing a territorial monopoly on the organization of decidability over uses of assets (property)),
    – Rule (dispute resolution, or resolution of differences),
    – Government (the production and management of commons), and;
    – Bureaucracy (a monopoly that manages daily operations) are four different things.

    Defense secures territory from appropriation by other large organizations capable of physical appropriation. Defense produces possibility of choice of SOCIAL ORDER (portfolio of property, norms, traditions, laws, legislation, regulation, institutions)

    Rule resolves disputes between people given the property allocations (in china, none, in russia, some, in europe some more, in america most.) In most cases norms are produced by the consequences of rulings by kings, judges, priests, and ‘authorities’. This is why laws vary: they must reflect the needs of the current stage of development of the people in the polity. Adjudications of differences produce LAW.

    Government produces commons through charging and maximizing fees (taxes) of members, and directing those fees to the production of commons, that they assume will produce multipliers (greater returns than private sector will) for the simple reason that some commons are extremely expensive. Legislation(contract) or Command(Dictate) produces LAW SUBSTITUTES we call Law but are not. This ‘conflation’ is endemic in discourse.

    Bureaucracy does labor that a market cannot yet perform through competition. In theory, a bureaucracy functions as portfolio (financial) manager of a function that the market cannot yet produce, or produce in sufficient quantity, or produce at a sufficient price. But like all monopolies they pursue self interest and always become corrupt. In a perfect world, states would start multiple competing bureaucracies like startups, and the best one or two would survive.

    WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO

    Governments create the possibility to organize increasingly complex markets with increasingly complex divisions of labor, with increasingly complex concentrations of capital, with increasingly complex abilities to adapt to shifts, changes, and shocks.

    Governments do this by prohibiting rent seeking, corruption, parasitism, theft, murder at the local level, and capturing the gains as taxation, which they then use to pay for the production of commons, that in turn produce multipliers (returns), that in turn increase standards of living – or governments fail to do so, by not suppressing corruption and not producing commons, and not producing multipliers.

    So governments create the possibilty of increasingly productive and rewarding polities. But it is the entire network of people from the monarchy (Rulers) to the peasantry (laborers) that create jobs through constant increases in the velocity of prodcutiion.

    Why? Because our only wealth is time. We are not wealthier than cave men. We simply make everything cheaper by taking less time with more hands in greater coordination to produce everything we desire for less and less of our time.

    Rules make a game. Governments make rules so that we can play economic games – and moreover that we cannot play anti-economic gains.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Do-governments-create-wealth-and-jobs-for-its-citizens

  • Do Cryptocurrencies Need To Be Stopped As This Economist States In The Article On The Link?

    The Economist is a very left of center publication whose editors and staff advance the western pursuit of a secular socialism in social democratic form. And private currencies would eliminate vast financial and state rents on citizens. So it threatens the globalist ambitions. Consensus seeking is not only a frailty of the female mind, but one of those attracted to globalism.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-cryptocurrencies-need-to-be-stopped-as-this-economist-states-in-the-article-on-the-link

  • Why Do Politicians And The Very Rich Benefit The Most In A Socialist Society?

    It’s pretty simple: freedom from market competition.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-politicians-and-the-very-rich-benefit-the-most-in-a-socialist-society

  • Do Governments Create Wealth And Jobs For Its Citizens?

    THE COMPLETE AND CORRECT ANSWER.

    —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citizens?”—-


    First, let’s understand some terms to make sure we know what we’re talking about.

    SERIES: Defense > Rule > Government > Bureaucracy (monopoly) > Institutions (anonymous cooperation at scale) > Markets (speculation, investment, production, distribution, trade) > Norms (friction reduction) > Truth Telling (friction reduction) > Trust (risk taking) > Economic Velocity > Social Order.

    DEFINITIONS:

    – Defense (producing a territorial monopoly on the organization of decidability over uses of assets (property)),
    – Rule (dispute resolution, or resolution of differences),
    – Government (the production and management of commons), and;
    – Bureaucracy (a monopoly that manages daily operations) are four different things.

    Defense secures territory from appropriation by other large organizations capable of physical appropriation. Defense produces possibility of choice of SOCIAL ORDER (portfolio of property, norms, traditions, laws, legislation, regulation, institutions)

    Rule resolves disputes between people given the property allocations (in china, none, in russia, some, in europe some more, in america most.) In most cases norms are produced by the consequences of rulings by kings, judges, priests, and ‘authorities’. This is why laws vary: they must reflect the needs of the current stage of development of the people in the polity. Adjudications of differences produce LAW.

    Government produces commons through charging and maximizing fees (taxes) of members, and directing those fees to the production of commons, that they assume will produce multipliers (greater returns than private sector will) for the simple reason that some commons are extremely expensive. Legislation(contract) or Command(Dictate) produces LAW SUBSTITUTES we call Law but are not. This ‘conflation’ is endemic in discourse.

    Bureaucracy does labor that a market cannot yet perform through competition. In theory, a bureaucracy functions as portfolio (financial) manager of a function that the market cannot yet produce, or produce in sufficient quantity, or produce at a sufficient price. But like all monopolies they pursue self interest and always become corrupt. In a perfect world, states would start multiple competing bureaucracies like startups, and the best one or two would survive.

    WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO

    Governments create the possibility to organize increasingly complex markets with increasingly complex divisions of labor, with increasingly complex concentrations of capital, with increasingly complex abilities to adapt to shifts, changes, and shocks.

    Governments do this by prohibiting rent seeking, corruption, parasitism, theft, murder at the local level, and capturing the gains as taxation, which they then use to pay for the production of commons, that in turn produce multipliers (returns), that in turn increase standards of living – or governments fail to do so, by not suppressing corruption and not producing commons, and not producing multipliers.

    So governments create the possibilty of increasingly productive and rewarding polities. But it is the entire network of people from the monarchy (Rulers) to the peasantry (laborers) that create jobs through constant increases in the velocity of prodcutiion.

    Why? Because our only wealth is time. We are not wealthier than cave men. We simply make everything cheaper by taking less time with more hands in greater coordination to produce everything we desire for less and less of our time.

    Rules make a game. Governments make rules so that we can play economic games – and moreover that we cannot play anti-economic gains.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Do-governments-create-wealth-and-jobs-for-its-citizens

  • Do Cryptocurrencies Need To Be Stopped As This Economist States In The Article On The Link?

    The Economist is a very left of center publication whose editors and staff advance the western pursuit of a secular socialism in social democratic form. And private currencies would eliminate vast financial and state rents on citizens. So it threatens the globalist ambitions. Consensus seeking is not only a frailty of the female mind, but one of those attracted to globalism.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-cryptocurrencies-need-to-be-stopped-as-this-economist-states-in-the-article-on-the-link

  • “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical car

    “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical care, housing, food, occasional entertainment, free clothing, free burial, free everything? The answer might be nuns and monks, but the standard reply is ‘prisoners’” Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn
  • “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical car

    “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical care, housing, food, occasional entertainment, free clothing, free burial, free everything? The answer might be nuns and monks, but the standard reply is ‘prisoners’”

    Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-27 06:14:00 UTC

  • “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical car

    “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical care, housing, food, occasional entertainment, free clothing, free burial, free everything? The answer might be nuns and monks, but the standard reply is ‘prisoners’” Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn
  • Great series of posts. Hey. One thing. The difference between Keynesians and Neo

    Great series of posts. Hey. One thing. The difference between Keynesians and Neo-Kenesians and Conservatives is two fold: 1) rule by discretion vs rule of law, and 2) only measuring consumption vs equilibrium between consumption and genetic, institutional, and knowledge capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 03:13:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945492786333278208

    Reply addressees: @conradhackett

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942649779942764544


    IN REPLY TO:

    @conradhackett

    Ending this thread of popular tweets from 2017 with this popular thread of population density maps. Thanks for scrolling this far!
    https://t.co/KrFc1HrF7t

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942649779942764544

  • Telling people that the redistributive spigot will be brought to an end, and the

    Telling people that the redistributive spigot will be brought to an end, and then creating opinion through repetition, by intent, is not going to make people confident. The question is, why do we want their confidence. Who negotiates better? USA, China, Russia?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 03:06:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945490964013043713

    Reply addressees: @conradhackett

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942642961833226240


    IN REPLY TO:

    @conradhackett

    No confidence in Trump
    🇲🇽Mexico 93%
    🇪🇸Spain 92%
    🇸🇪Sweden 90%
    🇩🇪Germany 87%
    🇹🇷Turkey 82%
    🇬🇧UK 75%
    🇨🇦Canada 75%
    🇦🇺Australia 70% https://t.co/9O2jGJENoq

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942642961833226240