Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • Why Do Americans Support The 1% Knowing They Will Never Be Part Of It?

    a large percentage of americans cross the 400k threshold at least one year.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-support-the-1-knowing-they-will-never-be-part-of-it

  • What Are The Different Branches Of Economics?

    I’m going to give you a different answer from the rest. Which is the group evolutionary strategy advanced by the different schools.

    Ostensibly, all schools study every scale of human interaction from behavior through micro, thru macro, through the world economic system. We teach the fundamentals with micro and macro. But these are just entry level disciplines.

    But just as people have intellectual, moral, and political biases in every field, so do they in economics.

    SCHOOLS OF ECONOMICS
    The schools of economics reflect the culture and class of their origins. These groups do not acknowledge that their strategies and biases are as I”ve stated them here but their research evidence states the contrary. So I have tried to provide a general Spectrum of the institutions by what I understand is their culture/class bias.

    a) “Austrian / Rothbardian” (“Jewish”, Separatist) : Rule of Credit, Parasitic Optimum, Separatist / Anarchism.
    +Financial Class Bias. Anti-Commons Bias.
    (As far as I know, no university teaches the Jewish Austrian method.)

    b) “Mason-ism” (“Anglo Libertarian”, Right ) : Optimum Rule of Law, Nash Optimum, Minimal State / Christian Monarchy
    +Entrepreneurial Class Bias.
    (the only University I know of using this program is George Mason.)
    The “Mason-Libertarian” school places greater emphasis on maximizing the voluntary cooperation of individuals and organizations through reduction of impediments to ethical and moral cooperation.

    c) “Classical” (“Chicago”, Anglo, Center Right), Rule of Law, Insured Nash Optimum, Parliamentary State / Classical Liberalism.
    +Middle classes bias. (I would argue ‘not biased’)
    All other things being equal, the Chicago school places greater emphasis on policy that insures against error and failure by seeking formulas and rules that investors, businesses, and consumers can predict, thereby preserving rule of law, and maintaining the prohibition on discretionary rule.

    d) “Mainstream” (“Saltwater”, Center Left) : Mixed Discretionary Rule, Pareto Optimum, Social Democracy
    +Working Class Bias, Consumer Bias, Female bias(anti-male bias). Minority(anti-white) bias. Underclass Bias (anti-entreprenurial bias).
    All other things being equal the mainstream seeks to optimize consumption at all times, using every lever available, and favors abandoning rule of law, and adopting rule that is increasingly empirical, reactive, and discretionary.

    e) “Left Mainstream” (“Saltwater”, “Jewish left”) : Authoritarian Rule, Anti-Aristocracy(War), Extractive Maximum (Predatory), Socialism/Communism
    +Underclass (outsider) Bias. This is the Krugman/Stiglitz/Delong club of leftist economists maximizing both consumption and financial extraction as a means of undermining western aristocratic civilization and western norms and traditions and rule of law.

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-different-branches-of-economics

  • What Do Libertarians Think About The Modern Monetary Theory?

    MMT is an interesting thought experiment.
    The problem is we can’t test the theory very easily.
    And the underlying question is whether it would just generate runaway inflation.
    And as far as I can tell it would.

    HOWEVER
    I will put money on the fact that governments will, sometime in the next few decades, distribute liquidity directly to citizens via debit cards, rather than attempt to manage interest rates.

    I will further put money on the fact that governments will, shortly thereafter, provide zero interest loans for the purpose of increasing consumption.

    And that as a consequence the consumer lending sector will all but disappear.

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-Libertarians-think-about-the-Modern-Monetary-Theory

  • In Laymans Terms, How Would You Define The “free Market”?

    That prices are determined by market forces independent of state interference. There is no perfectly free trade. And in the current era the value of free trade is no longer what the classical economists suggested.

    https://www.quora.com/In-Laymans-terms-how-would-you-define-the-free-market

  • What Do Libertarians Think Of A Progressive Global Wealth Tax?

    Why would we want to end capital flight? It tells governments that they are managing badly.

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-libertarians-think-of-a-progressive-global-wealth-tax

  • Why Do Americans Support The 1% Knowing They Will Never Be Part Of It?

    a large percentage of americans cross the 400k threshold at least one year.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-support-the-1-knowing-they-will-never-be-part-of-it

  • COMPLETE AND CORRECT ANSWER. —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citize

    https://www.quora.com/Do-governments-create-wealth-and-jobs-for-its-citizens/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1dbcc7c2&srid=u4Qv*THE COMPLETE AND CORRECT ANSWER.

    —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citizens?”—-*

    First, let’s understand some terms to make sure we know what we’re talking about.

    SERIES: *Defense > Rule > Government > Bureaucracy (monopoly) > Institutions (anonymous cooperation at scale) > Markets (speculation, investment, production, distribution, trade) > Norms (friction reduction) > Truth Telling (friction reduction) > Trust (risk taking) > Economic Velocity > Social Order.*

    TERMS

    **- Defense** (*producing a territorial monopoly on the organization of decidability over uses of assets (property)*),

    **- Rule** (*dispute resolution, or resolution of differences*),

    **- Government** (*the production and management of commons*), and;

    **- Bureaucracy** (*a monopoly that manages daily operations*) are four different things.

    DEFINITIONS:

    **Defense** secures territory from appropriation by other large organizations capable of physical appropriation. Defense produces possibility of choice of **SOCIAL ORDER** (portfolio of property, norms, traditions, laws, legislation, regulation, institutions)

    **Rule** resolves disputes between people given the property allocations (in china, none, in russia, some, in europe some more, in america most.) In most cases norms are produced by the consequences of rulings by kings, judges, priests, and ‘authorities’. This is why laws vary: they must reflect the needs of the current stage of development of the people in the polity. Adjudications of differences produce **LAW**.

    **Government** produces commons through charging and maximizing fees (taxes) of members, and directing those fees to the production of commons, that they assume will produce multipliers (greater returns than private sector will) for the simple reason that some commons are extremely expensive. Legislation(contract) or Command(Dictate) produces **LAW SUBSTITUTES** we call Law but are not. This ‘conflation’ is endemic in discourse.

    **Bureaucracy** does labor that a market cannot yet perform through competition. In theory, a bureaucracy functions as portfolio (financial) manager of a function that the market cannot yet produce, or produce in sufficient quantity, or produce at a sufficient price. But like all monopolies they pursue self interest and always become corrupt. In a perfect world, states would start multiple competing bureaucracies like startups, and the best one or two would survive.

    **WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO**

    Governments create the possibility to organize increasingly complex markets with increasingly complex divisions of labor, with increasingly complex concentrations of capital, with increasingly complex abilities to adapt to shifts, changes, and shocks.

    Governments do this by prohibiting rent seeking, corruption, parasitism, theft, murder at the local level, and capturing the gains as taxation, which they then use to pay for the production of commons, that in turn produce multipliers (returns), that in turn increase standards of living – or governments fail to do so, by not suppressing corruption and not producing commons, and not producing multipliers.

    So governments create the possibility of increasingly productive and rewarding polities. But it is the entire network of people from the monarchy (Rulers) to the peasantry (laborers) that create jobs through constant increases in the velocity of production.

    Why? Because our only wealth is time. We are not wealthier than cave men. We simply make everything cheaper by taking less time with more hands in greater coordination to produce everything we desire for less and less of our time.

    Rules make a game. Governments make rules so that we can play economic games – and moreover that we cannot play anti-economic gains.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian InstituteUpdated Dec 28, 2017, 8:38 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 20:38:00 UTC

  • *The Complete And Correct Answer.

    —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citizens?”—-* First, let’s understand some terms to make sure we know what we’re talking about. SERIES: *Defense > Rule > Government > Bureaucracy (monopoly) > Institutions (anonymous cooperation at scale) > Markets (speculation, investment, production, distribution, trade) > Norms (friction reduction) > Truth Telling (friction reduction) > Trust (risk taking) > Economic Velocity > Social Order.* TERMS **- Defense** (*producing a territorial monopoly on the organization of decidability over uses of assets (property)*), **- Rule** (*dispute resolution, or resolution of differences*), **- Government** (*the production and management of commons*), and; **- Bureaucracy** (*a monopoly that manages daily operations*) are four different things. DEFINITIONS: **Defense** secures territory from appropriation by other large organizations capable of physical appropriation. Defense produces possibility of choice of **SOCIAL ORDER** (portfolio of property, norms, traditions, laws, legislation, regulation, institutions) **Rule** resolves disputes between people given the property allocations (in china, none, in russia, some, in europe some more, in america most.) In most cases norms are produced by the consequences of rulings by kings, judges, priests, and ‘authorities’. This is why laws vary: they must reflect the needs of the current stage of development of the people in the polity. Adjudications of differences produce **LAW**. **Government** produces commons through charging and maximizing fees (taxes) of members, and directing those fees to the production of commons, that they assume will produce multipliers (greater returns than private sector will) for the simple reason that some commons are extremely expensive. Legislation(contract) or Command(Dictate) produces **LAW SUBSTITUTES** we call Law but are not. This ‘conflation’ is endemic in discourse. **Bureaucracy** does labor that a market cannot yet perform through competition. In theory, a bureaucracy functions as portfolio (financial) manager of a function that the market cannot yet produce, or produce in sufficient quantity, or produce at a sufficient price. But like all monopolies they pursue self interest and always become corrupt. In a perfect world, states would start multiple competing bureaucracies like startups, and the best one or two would survive. **WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO** Governments create the possibility to organize increasingly complex markets with increasingly complex divisions of labor, with increasingly complex concentrations of capital, with increasingly complex abilities to adapt to shifts, changes, and shocks. Governments do this by prohibiting rent seeking, corruption, parasitism, theft, murder at the local level, and capturing the gains as taxation, which they then use to pay for the production of commons, that in turn produce multipliers (returns), that in turn increase standards of living – or governments fail to do so, by not suppressing corruption and not producing commons, and not producing multipliers. So governments create the possibility of increasingly productive and rewarding polities. But it is the entire network of people from the monarchy (Rulers) to the peasantry (laborers) that create jobs through constant increases in the velocity of production. Why? Because our only wealth is time. We are not wealthier than cave men. We simply make everything cheaper by taking less time with more hands in greater coordination to produce everything we desire for less and less of our time. Rules make a game. Governments make rules so that we can play economic games – and moreover that we cannot play anti-economic gains. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
  • *The Complete And Correct Answer.

    —-”Do governments create wealth and jobs for citizens?”—-* First, let’s understand some terms to make sure we know what we’re talking about. SERIES: *Defense > Rule > Government > Bureaucracy (monopoly) > Institutions (anonymous cooperation at scale) > Markets (speculation, investment, production, distribution, trade) > Norms (friction reduction) > Truth Telling (friction reduction) > Trust (risk taking) > Economic Velocity > Social Order.* TERMS **- Defense** (*producing a territorial monopoly on the organization of decidability over uses of assets (property)*), **- Rule** (*dispute resolution, or resolution of differences*), **- Government** (*the production and management of commons*), and; **- Bureaucracy** (*a monopoly that manages daily operations*) are four different things. DEFINITIONS: **Defense** secures territory from appropriation by other large organizations capable of physical appropriation. Defense produces possibility of choice of **SOCIAL ORDER** (portfolio of property, norms, traditions, laws, legislation, regulation, institutions) **Rule** resolves disputes between people given the property allocations (in china, none, in russia, some, in europe some more, in america most.) In most cases norms are produced by the consequences of rulings by kings, judges, priests, and ‘authorities’. This is why laws vary: they must reflect the needs of the current stage of development of the people in the polity. Adjudications of differences produce **LAW**. **Government** produces commons through charging and maximizing fees (taxes) of members, and directing those fees to the production of commons, that they assume will produce multipliers (greater returns than private sector will) for the simple reason that some commons are extremely expensive. Legislation(contract) or Command(Dictate) produces **LAW SUBSTITUTES** we call Law but are not. This ‘conflation’ is endemic in discourse. **Bureaucracy** does labor that a market cannot yet perform through competition. In theory, a bureaucracy functions as portfolio (financial) manager of a function that the market cannot yet produce, or produce in sufficient quantity, or produce at a sufficient price. But like all monopolies they pursue self interest and always become corrupt. In a perfect world, states would start multiple competing bureaucracies like startups, and the best one or two would survive. **WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO** Governments create the possibility to organize increasingly complex markets with increasingly complex divisions of labor, with increasingly complex concentrations of capital, with increasingly complex abilities to adapt to shifts, changes, and shocks. Governments do this by prohibiting rent seeking, corruption, parasitism, theft, murder at the local level, and capturing the gains as taxation, which they then use to pay for the production of commons, that in turn produce multipliers (returns), that in turn increase standards of living – or governments fail to do so, by not suppressing corruption and not producing commons, and not producing multipliers. So governments create the possibility of increasingly productive and rewarding polities. But it is the entire network of people from the monarchy (Rulers) to the peasantry (laborers) that create jobs through constant increases in the velocity of production. Why? Because our only wealth is time. We are not wealthier than cave men. We simply make everything cheaper by taking less time with more hands in greater coordination to produce everything we desire for less and less of our time. Rules make a game. Governments make rules so that we can play economic games – and moreover that we cannot play anti-economic gains. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute
  • Do Cryptocurrencies Need To Be Stopped As This Economist States In The Article On The Link?

    The Economist is a very left of center publication whose editors and staff advance the western pursuit of a secular socialism in social democratic form. And private currencies would eliminate vast financial and state rents on citizens. So it threatens the globalist ambitions. Consensus seeking is not only a frailty of the female mind, but one of those attracted to globalism.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-cryptocurrencies-need-to-be-stopped-as-this-economist-states-in-the-article-on-the-link