—“Why should I be barred from contributing to the growth of another who would in turn contribute to my own growth?”— Bennard Ebanks When doing so imposes costs upon others by externality, who tolerate your presence only under the condition that you do not do so. Groups differ in the degree of suppression of externalization of costs. High trust high performance, homogenous polities are intolerant – and because they are, they have the choice. Low trust, heterogeneous, low performing are tolerant. Because they have no other choice.
Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. WHY KEEP DACHAS (VILLAGE FAMILY MICRO-FARMS)
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
WHY KEEP DACHAS (VILLAGE FAMILY MICRO-FARMS)
—“The broader and stronger your confidence and capacity to sustain yourself, in all the various forms of sustenance, the fewer and weaker the incentives to parasitize, in all the various forms of parasitism.”— Luke Weinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 19:55:14 UTC
-
WHY KEEP DACHAS (VILLAGE FAMILY MICRO-FARMS) —“The broader and stronger your c
WHY KEEP DACHAS (VILLAGE FAMILY MICRO-FARMS)
—“The broader and stronger your confidence and capacity to sustain yourself, in all the various forms of sustenance, the fewer and weaker the incentives to parasitize, in all the various forms of parasitism.”— Luke Weinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:55:00 UTC
-
“Why should I be barred from contributing to the growth of another who would in
—“Why should I be barred from contributing to the growth of another who would in turn contribute to my own growth?”— Bennard Ebanks
When doing so imposes costs upon others by externality, who tolerate your presence only under the condition that you do not do so.
Groups differ in the degree of suppression of externalization of costs. High trust high performance, homogenous polities are intolerant – and because they are, they have the choice. Low trust, heterogeneous, low performing are tolerant. Because they have no other choice.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 12:07:00 UTC
-
Retweeted FEE (@feeonline): In 1830, the workweek in the industrializing West av
Retweeted FEE (@feeonline):
In 1830, the workweek in the industrializing West averaged about 70 hours or, Sundays’ excluded, 11.6 hours of work per day. By 1890 that fell to 60 hours per week or 10 hours… https://fee.org/articles/capitalism-has-achieved-what-marxism-merely-promised/?utm_source=zapier&utm
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 14:41:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020317826664534016
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. Retweeted FEE (@feeonline): In 1830, the work
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Retweeted FEE (@feeonline):
In 1830, the workweek in the industrializing West averaged about 70 hours or, Sundaysâ excluded, 11.6 hours of work per day. By 1890 that fell to 60 hours per week or 10 hours… https://t.co/VkzKGjMHcI
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 14:41:29 UTC
-
RT @feeonline: In 1830, the workweek in the industrializing West averaged about
RT @feeonline: In 1830, the workweek in the industrializing West averaged about 70 hours or, Sundays’ excluded, 11.6 hours of work per day.…
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 14:41:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020317775087140865
-
Retweeted reason (@reason): We need to stop using the history of slavery to bols
Retweeted reason (@reason):
We need to stop using the history of slavery to bolster anti-capitalist ideology. Ingenuity, not exploitation by slavery or imperialism or finance, is the story of the modern world. https://bit.ly/2JCj6qI
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 14:41:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020317735698411522
-
Not to disagree, but it’s not clear borrowing for consumption is imposing harm o
Not to disagree, but it’s not clear borrowing for consumption is imposing harm or risk as long as one is not creating either intergenerational transfer or economic, monetary, and institutional fragility as a consequence. The problem? Without a measure (limit), we always do so.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 14:35:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020316145910517765
Reply addressees: @Race_Skin @DA_Stockman @SenMikeLee @TrueDilTom @realDonaldTrump @zerohedge @Styx666Official @JohnStossel @TruthGundlach @RubinReport @reason @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020307379680940032
IN REPLY TO:
@Race_Skin
@DA_Stockman @SenMikeLee @TrueDilTom @realDonaldTrump @zerohedge @Styx666Official @JohnStossel @curtdoolittle @TruthGundlach @RubinReport @reason @mises https://t.co/SI9vMiMraG
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020307379680940032
-
Yes there will be a dramatic ‘correction’. No, current tools (fiscal and monetar
Yes there will be a dramatic ‘correction’. No, current tools (fiscal and monetary) cannot correct it. Yes, we will have to adopt a different strategy. Yes I know what it is. Yes it will work. China is driving the world. No other state can. That or war(civil?) will be the trigger.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 11:51:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020275086362923008
Reply addressees: @YungLung710
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020158559286222848
IN REPLY TO:
@YungLung710
@curtdoolittle Any thoughts on the likelihood of economic collapse? Have you heard of/do you have an opinion on Peter Schiff?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020158559286222848