Not to disagree, but it’s not clear borrowing for consumption is imposing harm o

Not to disagree, but it’s not clear borrowing for consumption is imposing harm or risk as long as one is not creating either intergenerational transfer or economic, monetary, and institutional fragility as a consequence. The problem? Without a measure (limit), we always do so.


Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 14:35:00 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020316145910517765

Reply addressees: @Race_Skin @DA_Stockman @SenMikeLee @TrueDilTom @realDonaldTrump @zerohedge @Styx666Official @JohnStossel @TruthGundlach @RubinReport @reason @mises

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020307379680940032


IN REPLY TO:

@Race_Skin

@DA_Stockman @SenMikeLee @TrueDilTom @realDonaldTrump @zerohedge @Styx666Official @JohnStossel @curtdoolittle @TruthGundlach @RubinReport @reason @mises https://t.co/SI9vMiMraG

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020307379680940032

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *