October 30th, 2018 3:33 PM ARISTOCRATIC (PROPERTARIAN) MARKETS 5 – Established Males (industry/politics): Curt’s View 4 – Lightly Established Males (family/smb): Bill’s View 3 – Warrior Males (individuals/craftsmen): Eli Harman’s View. 2 – Occultists (outcasts/literary) … so far we don’t market there. Someone undoubtably will…. 1 – Traditionalists … (Religion/Tradition) … interested largely in the outputs not the history. (from bill and I discussing what’s going on … )
Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy
-
(not being pushy. just habit of phrasing. sorry) I’m saying that every time we h
(not being pushy. just habit of phrasing. sorry) I’m saying that every time we have tried to solve the problem with economic self interest in the absence of suppression of rents we fail.) Anyway. sorry to intrude. Someone looped me in, and I see common problem in your argument.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:46:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057025927866138624
Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024943429484549
IN REPLY TO:
@GonzoGeorgism
@curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen …. align with what is important to people?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024943429484549
-
Well, i wont’ intrude on your thread, but it’s not a different topic but it’s de
Well, i wont’ intrude on your thread, but it’s not a different topic but it’s dependent. -“No, the point of capitalistic agents is to maximize profit given the constraints of the market.”- But if and only if the easier method (rents) are not available to them. Rents come first.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:42:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024844670386176
Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024048897634308
IN REPLY TO:
@GonzoGeorgism
@curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen …. fundamentally different topic, which is how well economic policy is doing in delivering performance on particular variables that tend to correlate with perceptions of how well they‘re doing. Of course there is error in asserting that these determine perception completely….
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057024048897634308
-
(Which doesn’t matter in a signal economy, right? And, outside of Venezuela and
(Which doesn’t matter in a signal economy, right? And, outside of Venezuela and Mexico that’s the problem. Certainly is in the USA. Perception – meaning perception of relative condition in the face of signal uncertainty – is reality. it’s all people have to measure by.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:32:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057022376859312128
Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057020582649364482
IN REPLY TO:
@GonzoGeorgism
@curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen …. doing is an economic and therefore unavoidably empirical one. And especially if the question at hand is how well policy is affecting said correlating variables.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057020582649364482
-
well, as we have seen, predictability in finance, economics, political economy e
… well, as we have seen, predictability in finance, economics, political economy exist only when it is meaningless.Outliers cause nearly all activity.The rest is just noise as shocks ripple through the pattern of sustainable specialization and trade, amplified by discount rate.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:25:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057020532594524161
Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057020056561950722
IN REPLY TO:
@GonzoGeorgism
@curtdoolittle @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen …. have to make a few simplifying but reasonable assumptions about what tends to at least correlate with the perception that people have of how well they are doing for the purposes of discussion, especially since the context in which we are discussing how well they are….
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057020056561950722
-
The measure of doing well is a measure of perception not aggregation
The measure of doing well is a measure of perception not aggregation.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 21:14:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057017976254279681
Reply addressees: @GeolibGeorge @Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @ProfSteveKeen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1000866370551189506
IN REPLY TO:
@GonzoGeorgism
@Septeus7 @Slysneak @Lord_Keynes2 @Voltaire1778__8 @LambsRegret @jappleby123 @Noahpinion @curtdoolittle @ProfSteveKeen This is such a ridiculously hyperbolic portrayal of the average American & their standard of living. It isn‘t the Rust Belt, New England, or Appalachia. Things could be a lot better, and serious reforms need to be made; but the average American is doing far better than you claim
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1000866370551189506
-
The Limit of Commercial Self Interest
(FB Timestamp) THE LIMIT OF COMMERCIAL SELF INTEREST RE: Facebook, Twitter, Google, Quora, Stack Overflow, Medium, and all the rest of the ‘censors’…. [T]he secret to the Success of the West in both the Ancient and Modern worlds, is the speaking of uncomfortable truths, no matter the cost, and regardless of impact on the competence, self image, status, and dominance hierarchies.
- Honor instead of Face.
- Duty instead of Security.
- Reciprocity instead of Proportionality
- Order instead of Equality.
- Truth, Beauty, and Goodness instead of Harmony.
- Heroism vs Obedience
- Aristocracy of Everyone vs Peasantry of Everyone.
It is this ‘disregard’ for ‘face’ that produced all of western civilization’s excellences: truth, jury, rule of law, reason, empiricism, science, technology, medicine, markets, and the fastest adaptation of culture, economy, law, and polity to circumstance that is possible for mankind. By appealing to a world commercial market, where “Truth No Matter The Consequences” is not only unknown but anti social, and in many cases unethical, immoral, and highly offensive, we have let into our great civilization the antithesis of what made it great: Paying the price of offense to produce all that flows from telling the truth – from opinion, to testimony, to scientific fact. These companies, out of commercial self interest, are spending down the accumulated normative, cultural, traditional, intellectual, and institutional capital that we carefully accumulated over 3500 years of European evolution and development. The most intolerant wins. One can be tolerant of Truth and Opinion and create western civilization. Or one can be intolerant of Truth, and Opinion and reverse western civilization. What we are seeing is yet another invasion of intolerance, (first judaism and christianity), and now Judaism (Separatist Sophism), Postmodernism (Secular Christian Sophism), and Islam(Supernatural Conquest Sophism). Every single act of suppression of dissent against those who take offense is a THEFT of the capital of western civilization. In economic terms this is called: The Privatization of Public Capital – what we call ‘The Commons”. As I undrestand the situation, all of these companies are guilty of not only of (a) sedition, (b) conspiracy (c) massive privatization of the commons for commercial self interest, (d) use of proceeds and platform to coerce the state via the public to continue this privatization of the commons. This is theft. Period. Plan and simple. And sedition as well.
-
The Destruction of Property at All Levels
October 29th, 2018 10:11 AM MARXISM IN EVERYTHING: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY AT ALL LEVELSMarxism: suppression of private property in the means of production, vs, Libertarianism: suppression of common property as the means of production, vs, Neo-conservatism: suppression of nations as the means of production. All three promote MONOPOLIES (equalities) of the HERD (feminine reproductive strategy and intuition) rather than MARKETS (inequalities) of the PACK (make reproductive strategy and intuition). An expression of:
—“the psychometric literature indicates, in regards to the masculine vs feminine, and the conservative vs liberal.
Low openness/high conscientiousness (orderly, sensitive to disgust, will to create borders and demarcate categories, committed to his/her own covenants) High openness/low conscientiousness (imaginative, creative, disorderly, chaotic, tolerant of mess, fickle, temperamental, resistant of borders etc) It’s masculine vs feminine. A noun-use bias is masculine because itâs a label for an actual solid thing (order) A verb-use bias feminine because itâs the label for word describing an occurrence or something happening ie transformative ie chaotic – feminine. Masculine – order (Pack)Feminine – chaos. (Herd)”— Joel Harvey Because of the brain structure variation between female and male brains (although we can, each of us, exist along this spectrum including the middle of it). With Brandon Hayes and Joel Harvey
-
THE LIMIT OF COMMERCIAL SELF INTEREST RE: Facebook, Twitter, Google, Quora, Stac
THE LIMIT OF COMMERCIAL SELF INTEREST
RE: Facebook, Twitter, Google, Quora, Stack Overflow, Medium, and all the rest of the ‘censors’….
The secret to the Success of the West in both the Ancient and Modern worlds, is the speaking of uncomfortable truths, no matter the cost, and regardless of impact on the competence, self image, status, and dominance hierarchies.
– Honor instead of Face.
– Duty instead of Security.
– Reciprocity instead of Proportionality
– Order instead of Equality.
– Truth, Beauty, and Goodness instead of Harmony.
– Heroism vs Obedience
– Aristocracy of Everyone vs Peasantry of Everyone.
It is this ‘disregard’ for ‘face’ that produced all of western civilization’s excellences: truth, jury, rule of law, reason, empiricism, science, technology, medicine, markets, and the fastest adaptation of culture, economy, law, and polity to circumstance that is possible for mankind.
By appealing to a world commercial market, where “Truth No Matter The Consequences” is not only unknown but anti social, and in many cases unethical, immoral, and highly offensive, we have let into our great civilization the antithesis of what made it great:
Paying the price of offense to produce all that flows from telling the truth – from opinion, to testimony, to scientific fact.
These companies, out of commercial self interest, are spending down the accumulated normative, cultural, traditional, intellectual, and institutional capital that we carefully accumulated over 3500 years of European evolution and development.
The most intolerant wins. One can be tolerant of Truth and Opinion and create western civilization. Or one can be intolerant of Truth, and Opinion and reverse western civilization.
What we are seeing is yet another invasion of intolerance, (first judaism and christianity), and now Judaism (Separatist Sophism), Postmodernism (Secular Christian Sophism), and Islam(Supernatural Conquest Sophism).
Every single act of suppression of dissent against those who take offense is a THEFT of the capital of western civilization. In economic terms this is called: The Privatization of Public Capital – what we call ‘The Commons”.
As I undrestand the situation, all of these companies are guilty of not only of (a) sedition, (b) conspiracy (c) massive privatization of the commons for commercial self interest, (d) use of proceeds and platform to coerce the state via the public to continue this privatization of the commons.
This is theft. Period. Plan and simple. And sedition as well.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 18:11:00 UTC
-
MARXISM IN EVERYTHING: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY AT ALL LEVELS Marxism: suppre
MARXISM IN EVERYTHING: THE DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY AT ALL LEVELS
Marxism: suppression of private property in the means of production, vs, Libertarianism: suppression of common property as the means of production, vs, Neo-conservatism: suppression of nations as the means of production.
All three promote MONOPOLIES (equalities) of the HERD (feminine reproductive strategy and intuition) rather than MARKETS (inequalities) of the PACK (make reproductive strategy and intuition).
An expression of:
—“the psychometric literature indicates, in regards to the masculine vs feminine, and the conservative vs liberal.
Low openness/high conscientiousness (orderly, sensitive to disgust, will to create borders and demarcate categories, committed to his/her own covenants)
High openness/low conscientiousness (imaginative, creative, disorderly, chaotic, tolerant of mess, fickle, temperamental, resistant of borders etc)
It’s masculine vs feminine.
A noun-use bias is masculine because it’s a label for an actual solid thing (order)
A verb-use bias feminine because it’s the label for word describing an occurrence or something happening ie transformative ie chaotic – feminine.
Masculine – order (Pack)
Feminine – chaos. (Herd)”— Joel Harvey
Because of the brain structure variation between female and male brains (although we can, each of us, exist along this spectrum including the middle of it).
With Brandon Hayes and Joel Harvey
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 10:11:00 UTC