Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • The Post Marx-Keynes Economy: Our Restoration

    The Post Marx-Keynes Economy: Our Restoration https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-post-marx-keynes-economy-our-restoration/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 00:48:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267256624886005765

  • The Post Marx-Keynes Economy: Our Restoration

    The Post Marx-Keynes Economy: Our Restoration https://t.co/vtA1hzjdwO

  • The Post Marx-Keynes Economy: Our Restoration

    Oct 31, 2019, 11:33 AM

    —“There’s plenty wrong with GDP as a global measure of system performance. One of those problems is that no one has yet to come up with a better one.”—Duke Newcomb

    Income != balance sheet. That’s the problem. (Really). GDP P/C @ PPP = Standard of living. Change in Balance Sheet = Gain or Loss (productivity); GDP = Debt Capacity = Military Capacity = Coercive Capacity and that’s all it means. The problem is false productivity, were in consumption of capital is obscured by velocity, in order to maintain keynesian employment as a (bad) means of restoring economic velocity (which is the error) – where under digital and fiat money, liquidity distribution directly to the people will make employment a measure only of demographic utility (which is what the left is afraid of) and the correction of which (as I recommend) will re-suppress immigration, and re-suppress underclass reproduction, and restore middle class reproduction.The only way to increase wealth in this model is reproduction of the middle class, employment of young and old, payment for labor necessary to create an aesthetic commons, one child policy for those who are dependent, and following the japanese in automation.

  • The Post Marx-Keynes Economy: Our Restoration

    Oct 31, 2019, 11:33 AM

    —“There’s plenty wrong with GDP as a global measure of system performance. One of those problems is that no one has yet to come up with a better one.”—Duke Newcomb

    Income != balance sheet. That’s the problem. (Really). GDP P/C @ PPP = Standard of living. Change in Balance Sheet = Gain or Loss (productivity); GDP = Debt Capacity = Military Capacity = Coercive Capacity and that’s all it means. The problem is false productivity, were in consumption of capital is obscured by velocity, in order to maintain keynesian employment as a (bad) means of restoring economic velocity (which is the error) – where under digital and fiat money, liquidity distribution directly to the people will make employment a measure only of demographic utility (which is what the left is afraid of) and the correction of which (as I recommend) will re-suppress immigration, and re-suppress underclass reproduction, and restore middle class reproduction.The only way to increase wealth in this model is reproduction of the middle class, employment of young and old, payment for labor necessary to create an aesthetic commons, one child policy for those who are dependent, and following the japanese in automation.

  • Defining Socialism for Yang

    Defining Socialism for Yang https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/defining-socialism-for-yang/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 00:34:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267253168016166917

  • Defining Socialism for Yang

    Defining Socialism for Yang https://t.co/hz6wDsBgab

  • Defining Socialism for Yang

    —“Journalists who come to Des Moines tomorrow with an open mind will have those minds blown. #Yangapalooza secure the center secure the future”—@AndrewYang —“Its not socialist to tax big tech companies and give everyone a $1,00 a month. Everyone gets it, its pay for with technology. Its not socialist!”— @ironpatriot2016 —“Curt?”—

    Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets. Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons. Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers. The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard. Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard. Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise. When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade. I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention. And fools come for the bait.

  • Defining Socialism for Yang

    —“Journalists who come to Des Moines tomorrow with an open mind will have those minds blown. #Yangapalooza secure the center secure the future”—@AndrewYang —“Its not socialist to tax big tech companies and give everyone a $1,00 a month. Everyone gets it, its pay for with technology. Its not socialist!”— @ironpatriot2016 —“Curt?”—

    Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets. Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons. Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers. The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard. Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard. Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise. When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade. I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention. And fools come for the bait.

  • Incentives at The Bottom

    Incentives at The Bottom https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/incentives-at-the-bottom/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 00:09:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267246759081885696

  • Incentives at The Bottom

    Incentives at The Bottom https://t.co/SGsz9Chi3T