Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • RUSSIAN AND AMERICAN METHODS COMPATIBLE Did you know that people with high fat c

    RUSSIAN AND AMERICAN METHODS COMPATIBLE

    Did you know that people with high fat content, and who are heavy drinkers, under the right conditions, can be used to create the wick effect we see in spontaneous human combustion – and that they’ll burn slowly for many many hours?

    However, the wicking effect can be created intentionally by splitting the skin, exposing the fat, inserting wicking material, and lighting it with a smoldering source of flame such as coal, charcoal, rope, cloth, or cigarette.

    Just sayin’ that in the sequence of:

    a) guillotining (by knife, sword, axe, or guillotine

    b) hanging (short-drop strangling and long-drop neck breaking forms)

    c) impaling (in both abdominal and anal forms)

    d) crucifixion (in its many forms)

    e) burning at the stake (in its many forms)

    we can add:

    f) ‘wicking’, which I assume must be a pretty horrible way to go, since burning slowly alive and watching it has got to be pretty horrible.

    The guillotine is more of an ‘industrial’ solution requiring very little effort and expense, while still providing civic entertainment for the many.

    Long drop hanging of 8-10 feet is pretty rewarding and less messy.

    I have this feeling americans would be more Organized about housecleaning, and the Russians would be more enthusiastic and, well, entertaining.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 08:25:00 UTC

  • “There’s no organic Russophobia. The source of Russophobia is in #Russia”— tru

    —“There’s no organic Russophobia. The source of Russophobia is in #Russia”—

    true


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-07 01:29:00 UTC

  • Lies, lies and more lies. He follows his creed: white liberation theology

    Lies, lies and more lies. He follows his creed: white liberation theology.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 20:25:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673599051238154244

    Reply addressees: @politico

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673597678610227200


    IN REPLY TO:

    @politico

    Obama to use Oval to calm nation’s fears https://t.co/NfWAtkbe0Z | AP Photo https://t.co/ihwqkHYQlZ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673597678610227200

  • AGAINST INVESTING IN RAND It’s a dead topic. Rands arguments are not bad. It’s h

    AGAINST INVESTING IN RAND

    It’s a dead topic. Rands arguments are not bad. It’s her followers that tend to be the problem for her philosophy not her work itself.

    She made philosophy accessible through literature. But in doing so included those incapable of its mastery, and who instead thrash quotes about like chimps with sticks.

    The more relevant question is why in an age of science one would even try to employ rationalism given that the language of discourse is now science, economics and law.

    What this means is that the bar to discourse has been raised leaving rationalism ( noncontradiction) behind.

    Cooperation is a scientific problem, not

    And so you burn energy defending what you understand but which is of no political or innovative value.

    Liberty is a genetic preference of a permanent minority. Rand can merely justify that preference and insulate it from moral critique.

    But other than that defense there is no solution there and no value there .

    And the more opportunity cost you waste on that malinvestment the less investment you make in something useful with which to transform the world and advance existential Liberty.

    Science, economics law.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 05:14:00 UTC

  • TUCKER AS RATIONALIST IN AGE OF SCIENCE (Note: I’m not anti-Tucker. I see him as

    TUCKER AS RATIONALIST IN AGE OF SCIENCE

    (Note: I’m not anti-Tucker. I see him as a very good man with good intentions but part of a prior generation’s thinking whose time has long passed, and methods have long failed. But I have no reason to believe that he is anything other than a good man with good intentions. I like him quite a bit and always have.)

    —“The media is a business meaning that they can’t coerce you, tax you, bomb you, deport you, kill you. All they can do is write articles and make shows that sell advertising. And you are willing to celebrate a would-be dictator because he foils some reporters???”—Jeffrey A. Tucker

    (a) Regarding the media, are you rationalizing what the media can do, or are you relying upon empirical evidence of what the media can do? Because the evidence is that they create opinion in sufficient voters to do precisely what you say they cannot. (b) I have a hard time seeing the difference between the current president and a trump presidency or any other presidency in the absence of rule of law. And given the evidence of (a), its logical to prefer a president who will continue to undermine (a).

    Liberty is produced by rule of law(universal application) demanding the total prohibition on parasitism(imposition of costs) in the private (morality) and public (liberty) spheres of action, constructed by individual enforcement of norms, individual enforcement of law under universal standing, organized enforcement of the law under an independent judiciary, and organized prevention of usurpation of that law by the militia.

    And liberty is (again, empirically not just rationally) a preference of and only of a limited number of individuals in limited family structures, with limited cultural traditions, with limited legal traditions. All others systematically seek to undermine it in every polity on earth.

    Man was not kept down and oppressed by his betters. Man was incrementally civilized by his betters, much against his will. He was forced to abandon murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by asymmetry, fraud by indirection, fraud by obscurantism, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy, conversion, immigration, war, and conquest.

    By being forced to abandon all unproductive and parasitic actions, the only venue left for man was the burden of participation in the market through productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange free of imposition of cost by externality.

    But the arts of production are difficult, and the arts of lying, defrauding, cheating, stealing, blackmailing, free riding, privatization of commons, socialization of losses, conspiracy are much easier.

    Liberty requires meritocracy and meritocracy is not a matter of belief it is a mater of ability.

    Genes matter. Open immigration is empirically destructive. While we can estimate the decline in anglo intelligence since 1850, we can measure the decline in French intelligence due to immigration just since 1950. The Flynn effect can be reversed through degradation of the gene pool.

    It is the gene pool that establishes the degree of liberty, the degree of truth telling, the degree of productivity, the norms and traditions of a polity.

    It is a romantic amateurism to pursue liberty as a philosophical choice – a religion or cult – versus an empirical problem to be solved.

    The age of rationalization has ended just as the age of mysticism ended. The current era is one of science: requiring both internal consistency(logical and rational) and external correspondence(empirical) as well as existentially possible (operationally articulable) and morality (voluntary transfers) bounded by full accounting (of all costs to all capital) and parsimony (defined limits of falsification).

    Time for the adult version of liberty: Aristocratic(meritocratic) Egalitarian(meritocratic) Eugenic(meritocratic) Nomocracy(rule of law) assisted by a market for the production of commons using the exception of legal dissent, rather than the requirement of universal assent by majority rule.

    Trump is a tool of progress. That is all. Liberty requires progress. Moreover it requires we repress the rates of reproduction of the underclasses who will not and cannot participate in liberty.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 02:47:00 UTC

  • We are afraid infantilized progressives will hurt themselves with lawn darts. Bu

    We are afraid infantilized progressives will hurt themselves with lawn darts. But they wouldn’t touch a ‘scary’ gun. See? Logical.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 17:49:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673197612011515905

    Reply addressees: @Salon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/672762329424142336


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Salon

    The Second Amendment must go: We ban lawn darts. It’s time to ban guns https://t.co/jpg4kIiaoP https://t.co/F6CGjMM6Wc

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/672762329424142336

  • Parasites seek rich food sources

    Parasites seek rich food sources.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 17:45:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673196588458725377

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist_UK

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673194743359217664


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673194743359217664

  • Brilliant Idea. Big Empty City. Has it’s own port and waterway, can easily be wa

    Brilliant Idea. Big Empty City. Has it’s own port and waterway, can easily be walled off into an enormous ghetto.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 17:36:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673194166646607872

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist_UK

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673193281132617728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/673193281132617728

  • FOLLOWUP TO: THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM

    FOLLOWUP TO: THE FAILED BOOK OF ATHENIAN TRUTH, THE SUCCESSFUL BOOK OF JERUSALEM’S LIES

    —Dr. Dolittle, you’re an ignorant anti-semite!!—

    Actually I’m not anti-anything, and I am probably the most knowledgeable person working today on the subject of Truth, and its consequences in Ethics, Morality, and Politics. Which I’m happy to demonstrate in any debate with anyone living at any time. And I probably know the very few people capable of debating me.

    Either statements are true, statements are false or statements are undecidable. Either you can attack the arguments that I put forward or you cant. No name calling will alter the truth or falsity of the statements. All it demonstrates is that you’re either ignorant or dishonest.

    The fact of the matter is that westerners discovered quite by accident, the technology of truth and it resulted in reason, science, medicine, technology and nearly all significant advancements made by mankind.

    The fact of the matter is that for some reason, probably necessity, the hebrews created very useful means of deception of simple people who wished for the world to be other than it is. Their first great lie was scriptural monotheism. Their second great lies were pseudoscience.

    The New England neo-puritans (my people, my ancestors, since my ancestors were norman and then puritans in the plymouth and new haven colonies,) evolved into the anti-slavery movement as a way of preparing the way for women’s suffrage. This is all well documented history. Sorry. The combination of the radical changes of the industrial revolution, the anglo, french, german, and jewish enlightenment failures, and the failure of western governments to successfully adapt rule of law and political processes that provide a means of constructing commons, could not adapt.

    While a good number of our greatest minds understood that a problem was in progress they failed at solving it. Poincaré, Russell, Mises, Hayek, Popper, Bridgman, Brouwer, all failed to solve the problem of the social sciences. And because they failed, the 20th century will be remembered both as a rapid economic expansion, and (as Hayek warned it would be) a century of mysticism. Or, given their lack of understanding of the reason for the success of the discipline of science, ‘the century of pseudoscience.’.

    These are just facts. Deal with reality. We don’t need more lies. We’ve destroyed western civilization with those lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 15:28:00 UTC

  • We outlawed lawn darts but not guns?–Salon —@Salon We are afraid infantilized

    –We outlawed lawn darts but not guns?–Salon

    —@Salon We are afraid infantilized progressives will hurt themselves with lawn darts. But they wouldn’t touch a ‘scary’ gun. See? Logical.—Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-05 15:27:00 UTC