https://twitter.com/MartianHoplite/status/767313621273554944/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=767455069935632384Retweeted Eli Harman (@MartianHoplite):
Blog post: Likelihood vs. Frequency #radicalislamicterrorism #profiling #treason
https://t.co/b50Ju1jOWv https://t.co/hxch8f5fOe
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 16:15:00 UTC
WHY COUNTERSIGNAL?
—“Curt: Why go out of your way to counter-signal?”—
I have followers from around the world, in all colors, and I view my work as a universal solution for advocating paternal nationalism under which all tribes can transcend the burdens of their lower classes, and predation by ruling classes – and to so morally.
So as a general rule, I disassociate myself from anti-whatever organizations and advocate for solutions that enable each group to transcend.
There is a great difference between resistance movements and revolutionary reformations. Resistance has not worked.
WN is not successful and cannot be. Neo-reaction and paleo’s could be. The alt-right might evolve to influential. Of the older generations, The religious, The traditional(familial), jeffersonian(legal) have been only successful by stalling the onslaught.
But The New Right will be. Because we give each group the argumentative, institutional, and revolutionary tools for positive change, rather than mere resistance.
How you argue reflects your class, ability, and knowledge to argue.
Aristocracy argues as a wise but determined father.
That is our role as ‘warriors’, ‘head-men’, ‘chieftains’, ‘generals’, and ‘kings’: to JUDGE.
We just needed a scientific method of judgment.
And that’s what I’ve given us.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 04:09:00 UTC
When you abandon the argument then respond with an ad hom, it shows you’re a coward & incompetent
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 20:56:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767103076993994752
Reply addressees: @PAKallman @RealSuperflyTNT @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767102046768017408
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767102046768017408
But the fact that i must explain this to you makes all you think suspect.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 18:47:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767070622530822144
Reply addressees: @RealSuperflyTNT @alllibertynews @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767064727918931968
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@RealSuperflyTNT @alllibertynews @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises facts are theories of data. The theory remains an open question
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/767064727918931968
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@RealSuperflyTNT @alllibertynews @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises facts are theories of data. The theory remains an open question
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/767064727918931968
Rothbardianism is how old?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 18:02:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767059342847840256
Reply addressees: @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767050091785916416
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767050091785916416
unless you can state why you’re just name calling.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 17:58:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767058340300062720
Reply addressees: @PAKallman @BobMurphyEcon @mises
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767050204470124544
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767050204470124544
how?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 17:57:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767058041460125696
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767055830671724544
IN REPLY TO:
@FriedrichHayek
@curtdoolittle he did solve it.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767055830671724544
RT @MartianHoplite: @curtdoolittle @timothyrauch @mamasaurusof2 @cmandrecyk @CookPolitical @dmataconis Canadians’ opinion of Trump is from…
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 17:25:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767049973749968900
@mises We do not discount newton for his superstitions. Why discount Mises for his logical superstitions, Rothbard for his, or Hoppe his?
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:16:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767002392554409984
@Mises There is no reason that we could not reframe the world dialog on liberty and take just credit. Except for admitting past failures.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 14:15:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767002153852383232