Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • I wouldn’t make that assumption. it’s just a rationalization

    I wouldn’t make that assumption. it’s just a rationalization.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-29 20:34:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/792464769936683009

    Reply addressees: @fatt_sam

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/792444753619087361


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/792444753619087361

  • (Questions by James Ragsdale. My favorite posts. And often, the only questions w

    (Questions by James Ragsdale. My favorite posts. And often, the only questions worth considering in public forums. Especially philosophy blogs. Unfortunately, they are also the questions that require effort-posting to answer. On the other hand, it’s a joy to know that someone else cares about the questions that are hard to answer by other than introspective appeal to sentiments in the near absence of reason and evidence. Which is an abstruse means of thanking you James for making the world a less lonely place for a philosopher. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-29 08:12:00 UTC

  • GRIFTERS IN CHIEF”

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/grifters-in-chief-1477610771″THE GRIFTERS IN CHIEF”


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 18:37:00 UTC

  • Criminal, unethical, immoral, evil

    Criminal,

    unethical,

    immoral,

    evil


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 17:01:00 UTC

  • William Butchman , Eli Harman I had no idea this podcast was this freaking amazi

    https://propertarianforum.wordpress.com/2016/10/26/propertarian-podcast-007-market-fascism/(Damn William Butchman , Eli Harman I had no idea this podcast was this freaking amazing when we recorded it. It’s fantastic. damn.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 12:04:00 UTC

  • REPEATING: SUMMARY OF THE NEW RIGHT’S MARKET FASCISM, PROPERTARIAN ETHICS, AND T

    https://singulardiscourse.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/what-i-think-ive-got-from-propertarianism-so-far/WORTH REPEATING: SUMMARY OF THE NEW RIGHT’S MARKET FASCISM, PROPERTARIAN ETHICS, AND TESTIMONIAL TRUTH


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 11:04:00 UTC

  • PEMBER ON THE SUMMARY OF THE NEW RIGHT

    http://civilianwarcollege.com/summary-new-right/AUSTYN PEMBER ON THE SUMMARY OF THE NEW RIGHT


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 11:02:00 UTC

  • THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF VIOLENCE: (from Eli Harman) (worth repeating) It’s an

    THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF VIOLENCE:

    (from Eli Harman) (worth repeating)

    It’s an article of faith among many libertarians that violence, and particularly aggressive violence, is necessarily negative sum.

    Prices contain information and markets broker them (in a subjective utility maximising way.) Violence only short circuits that, disrupts markets, destroy price signals, and makes everyone worse off.

    But this is not correct.

    In the first place, market transactions aren’t necessarily positive sum. If they are fraudulent or create negative externalities for those not party, they can be negative sum.

    And in the second place, violence is itself a signal, and transmits information. A threat expresses a subjective evaluation just as an offer does in the marketplace. “Hey, don’t do that or we’re going to fight.”

    And the initiation of hostilities demonstrates the authenticity of that information just as a payment does in the marketplace. One undertakes real cost, and real risk, in resorting to violence.

    (In contrast, whining, and playing the victim DO NOT demonstrate the authenticity of grievances in the way that resorting to violence does, and so are liable and likely to prove negative sum, if indulged, just as theft is liable and likely to prove negative sum, in the marketplace, because it does not make a sufficient demonstration and exchange of value.)

    Markets and prices on the one hand, and violence and threats on the other, are both necessary components to a stable, functional, and efficient society and economy. To suppress either wholly in favor of the other, would be to forego the benefits they offer, and to pervert incentives towards destructive outcomes.

    No society which does either will be able to compete, long term, against one which makes a more sensible tradeoff between them, making best use of information supplied by both exchange and conflict.

    Violence is the means of expressing the subjective evaluations not captured by price signals, which are as vast and varied as those which are.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-28 10:40:00 UTC

  • Welcome to the revolution

    Welcome to the revolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-27 21:13:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/791749779659382785

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790944471865253888


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/790944471865253888

  • love you man. thanks. 🙂

    love you man. thanks. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-10-26 23:52:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/791427209793798144

    Reply addressees: @Bob_Mitt @ThaRightStuff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/791406212806049792


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/791406212806049792