Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • “And you’ll be doing that from the Ukraine on your Facebook account, correct? Te

    —“And you’ll be doing that from the Ukraine on your Facebook account, correct? Tell us again how propertarianism is *the* answer to all our problems.”—

    Straw man. I didn’t say it was. I said that either we propose incremental, institutional solutions and a plan of transition, and demand it by violence, or we are just asking the left to double down and marshall against us by further controlling the discourse. The only reason the past few years have been possible is because they didn’t regulate right-speech. But as you see, (like bitcoin can be regulated) it is entirely possible to regulate right speech under false pretenses.

    I consistently make the same criticism: the only solution is a solution demanded by violence that overthrows the system that makes our oppression possible. There is no answer in the alt-right. It’s a good tactic while you have ‘permission’ to ridicule on the same terms as the left. But in the end, their profession is ridicule and gossip and rallying and shaming. And our profession is violence. Or we have no profession at all.

    We need the equivalent of a ‘cuck’ term for people who engage in these various rhetorical fallacies.

    I mean, only a pussy makes the right’s equivalent of rallying and shaming arguments, right? It’s pussy-argument.

    Either you can man up and fight, or you can man up and argue, or you’re just a fucking pussy. Right?

    Simple.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 07:48:00 UTC

  • Moldbug identifies the Cathedral Complex. But he has no answer to the problem

    Moldbug identifies the Cathedral Complex. But he has no answer to the problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-29 18:06:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803661428888584192

    Reply addressees: @NickLand10 @Anti_Gnostic @charlesmurray @JonHaidt @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803660435480309760


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803660435480309760

  • Hoppe in German Rational, Mencius in Jewish Cosmopolitan, Nick Land in Continent

    Hoppe in German Rational, Mencius in Jewish Cosmopolitan, Nick Land in Continental, Doolittle in Anglo Empirical. We cover the spectrum.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-29 13:44:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803595575174148097

  • yep

    yep.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 21:54:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803356471622770693

    Reply addressees: @JimmyTrussels

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803331063552544769


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JimmyTrussels

    @curtdoolittle Anglos should have let it get Aztec’d by the Russians, two centuries ago. The Chinese won’t give a fuck, though.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803331063552544769

  • Prosecutor vs Educator – But Otherwise Its The Same Message

      Stephan Molyneux won’t engage me. It’s a loss for the movement really. The contrast would be brilliant. SECRET: I might be an effete, but I know who I am marketing to: the same as Trump-the people willing to fight. Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg. It’s sometimes hard to grasp the difference between creating MORAL POSSIBILITY and limiting IMMORAL ACTIONS. Western Civilization does not engage in conflation, so RELIGION, MORALITY, and LAW are different disciplines. Stephan practices Moral Philosophy,and I Practice Moral LAW. (Positive advocacy vs Negative threat). Same Msg We require BOTH. Positive advocacy for the purpose of pedagogy, and negative prohibition for limits. This is why Stephan’s work and mine overlap so much, but ‘sound’ different. He’s a teacher, I’m a prosecutor. And if you understand scientific epistemology that’s how it functions: positive THEORY and negative TEST. Stephan made a career out of educating. I’ve made a body of law, and I teach prosecutors. It’s that simple. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Prosecutor vs Educator – But Otherwise Its The Same Message

      Stephan Molyneux won’t engage me. It’s a loss for the movement really. The contrast would be brilliant. SECRET: I might be an effete, but I know who I am marketing to: the same as Trump-the people willing to fight. Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg. It’s sometimes hard to grasp the difference between creating MORAL POSSIBILITY and limiting IMMORAL ACTIONS. Western Civilization does not engage in conflation, so RELIGION, MORALITY, and LAW are different disciplines. Stephan practices Moral Philosophy,and I Practice Moral LAW. (Positive advocacy vs Negative threat). Same Msg We require BOTH. Positive advocacy for the purpose of pedagogy, and negative prohibition for limits. This is why Stephan’s work and mine overlap so much, but ‘sound’ different. He’s a teacher, I’m a prosecutor. And if you understand scientific epistemology that’s how it functions: positive THEORY and negative TEST. Stephan made a career out of educating. I’ve made a body of law, and I teach prosecutors. It’s that simple. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Racist Paul Krugman – Wishing White People Dead Even Sooner

    (profound) (read) (share) —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor? Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it? Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to? Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition? Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital? Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms? You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold? What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)? We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents? If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech. If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then. Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction? With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right? We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman. There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law. Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science. Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience. And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit. And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital. And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries. I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold. WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • The Racist Paul Krugman – Wishing White People Dead Even Sooner

    (profound) (read) (share) —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor? Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it? Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to? Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition? Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital? Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms? You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold? What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)? We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents? If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech. If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then. Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction? With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right? We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman. There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law. Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science. Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience. And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit. And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital. And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries. I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold. WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • I want to drink 30 year scotch from Paul Krugman’s Skull as we drag the Nobel Co

    I want to drink 30 year scotch from Paul Krugman’s Skull as we drag the Nobel Committee away in chains. #NewRight #endleftistpseudoscience


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-27 23:55:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803024506918944772

  • ( Never thought of it that way, but it’s hysterical. 🙂 )

    ( Never thought of it that way, but it’s hysterical. 🙂 ) https://twitter.com/BenjaminRVA/status/803000368120655872