Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • TO THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT ON YOUR LATEST VIRTUE-SIGNALING EXERCISE REGARDING

    TO THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT ON YOUR LATEST VIRTUE-SIGNALING EXERCISE REGARDING TRUMP.

    We have a word over here on The Right for men who genuflect before women’s emotionalism as if their feelings equate to material change in state. We call these men ‘cucks’. Short for ‘cuckolds’. And for reasons we can’t quite understand, other than perhaps Australians and New Zealanders have no other achievement or export than virtue-signaling, it seems that members of both governments do little more than produce a virtue-signaling economy of cuckoldry. Why? Because the female vote is bought cheaply with the same meaningless emotional currency as women demand and cuckholds sell. Meanwhile the empirical people in the world, in our financial, commercial, and military economies try to produce material benefits faster than the Red Queen of Virtue Signals can tax them, spend to demonstrate virtue signals for women who are consumers of emotions rather than facts.

    This is the reason that democracy is coming to an end. The century of virtue signaling is coming to an end. Because we can no longer produce an unwarranted fraudulent emotional product on the backs of people who create material products, services, and information.

    You are not seeing what you think you’re seeing. What you’re seeing is america implode from its own virtue signaling in the face of the universal adoption of consumer capitalism, the end of the Peace of Westphalia, the end of Anglo dominance of the international network of finance and trade, and and the restoration of non-state warfare by religion, demographics, disinformation, and persistent petty raiding that increases cooperative risk – decreasing trust, increasing demand for an authoritarian state to forestall declines in trust, and the economic consequences of political and economic and social distrust.

    And just to be clear: it was ‘cucks’ chasing female votes with ‘free lunches’ and virtue signals that brought the end to the Westphalian Peace and the restoration of polycentric warfare by both military, economic, demographic, religious, and disinformational means.

    It was women who filled the universities with demand for the Frankfurt schools’ utopian promises, and paid the academy money for anthropological, political, social and economic pseudoscience. Driving up university revenues and impoverishing a generation in old age, so that they could study pseudoscience in large numbers, and vote to expand it.

    Can you look the evidence of history in the face? Or will you deny the truth of granting women access to the same responsibilities as men without the same cognitive biases of men, instead of giving women a separate house of parliament, and requiring reconciliation between men and women of different reproductive interests and cognitive biases? Can you look the evidence of history in the face and accept that the English method of creating houses for each class created a market for exchanges of commons between the classes, and that single-house monopoly government, abandonment of natural law in favor of fashionable majoritarianism, further expanded the monopoly – eroding the market for exchanges between the classes.

    You are just behind the USA. Britain is smaller so it is just catching up to the USA. But the answer is the same: we had more trouble domesticating women’s hyper-consumption than we did men’s violence. That’s why we invented monogamy: as a trade. We have been battling islam since 700AD when they caused the military collapse of mediterranean trade through raids, and incrementally de-civilized North Africa, Spain, and the Balkans just as they are causing raids against us today. And none of those regions has been able to recover in the centuries since.

    So perhaps you should look in the mirror. The world is shifting from the era of a monopoly of pseudoscience, fraud, and lies, to an era of trade once again, between nations and classes and genders.

    Why? Because monopolies are always a bad thing that attract the worst people, and a monopoly producer of virtue signals on the backs of producers that sells signals to useful idiots, granted votes by virtue of existence, rather than by demonstrated success in contributing to the commons in a market for reproduction; a market for goods, services, and information; a market for dispute resolution by natural, judge-discovered common law, and a market for the production of commons between the classes, is just the most sophisticated system of selling religion, snake oil, pyramid schemes, and fraud since the church invented the bureaucratization of preaching and the collecting of tithes.

    The fool is in the mirror.

    (Thus ended the lesson so to speak.)

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 09:56:00 UTC

  • “And you’ll be doing that from the Ukraine on your Facebook account, correct? Te

    —“And you’ll be doing that from the Ukraine on your Facebook account, correct? Tell us again how propertarianism is *the* answer to all our problems.”—

    Straw man. I didn’t say it was. I said that either we propose incremental, institutional solutions and a plan of transition, and demand it by violence, or we are just asking the left to double down and marshall against us by further controlling the discourse. The only reason the past few years have been possible is because they didn’t regulate right-speech. But as you see, (like bitcoin can be regulated) it is entirely possible to regulate right speech under false pretenses.

    I consistently make the same criticism: the only solution is a solution demanded by violence that overthrows the system that makes our oppression possible. There is no answer in the alt-right. It’s a good tactic while you have ‘permission’ to ridicule on the same terms as the left. But in the end, their profession is ridicule and gossip and rallying and shaming. And our profession is violence. Or we have no profession at all.

    We need the equivalent of a ‘cuck’ term for people who engage in these various rhetorical fallacies.

    I mean, only a pussy makes the right’s equivalent of rallying and shaming arguments, right? It’s pussy-argument.

    Either you can man up and fight, or you can man up and argue, or you’re just a fucking pussy. Right?

    Simple.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 07:48:00 UTC

  • Moldbug identifies the Cathedral Complex. But he has no answer to the problem

    Moldbug identifies the Cathedral Complex. But he has no answer to the problem.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-29 18:06:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803661428888584192

    Reply addressees: @NickLand10 @Anti_Gnostic @charlesmurray @JonHaidt @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803660435480309760

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803660435480309760

  • Hoppe in German Rational, Mencius in Jewish Cosmopolitan, Nick Land in Continent

    Hoppe in German Rational, Mencius in Jewish Cosmopolitan, Nick Land in Continental, Doolittle in Anglo Empirical. We cover the spectrum.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-29 13:44:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803595575174148097

  • yep

    yep.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 21:54:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803356471622770693

    Reply addressees: @JimmyTrussels

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803331063552544769

    IN REPLY TO:

    @JimmyTrussels

    @curtdoolittle Anglos should have let it get Aztec’d by the Russians, two centuries ago. The Chinese won’t give a fuck, though.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803331063552544769

  • Prosecutor vs Educator – But Otherwise Its The Same Message

      Stephan Molyneux won’t engage me. It’s a loss for the movement really. The contrast would be brilliant. SECRET: I might be an effete, but I know who I am marketing to: the same as Trump-the people willing to fight. Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg. It’s sometimes hard to grasp the difference between creating MORAL POSSIBILITY and limiting IMMORAL ACTIONS. Western Civilization does not engage in conflation, so RELIGION, MORALITY, and LAW are different disciplines. Stephan practices Moral Philosophy,and I Practice Moral LAW. (Positive advocacy vs Negative threat). Same Msg We require BOTH. Positive advocacy for the purpose of pedagogy, and negative prohibition for limits. This is why Stephan’s work and mine overlap so much, but ‘sound’ different. He’s a teacher, I’m a prosecutor. And if you understand scientific epistemology that’s how it functions: positive THEORY and negative TEST. Stephan made a career out of educating. I’ve made a body of law, and I teach prosecutors. It’s that simple. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Prosecutor vs Educator – But Otherwise Its The Same Message

      Stephan Molyneux won’t engage me. It’s a loss for the movement really. The contrast would be brilliant. SECRET: I might be an effete, but I know who I am marketing to: the same as Trump-the people willing to fight. Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg. It’s sometimes hard to grasp the difference between creating MORAL POSSIBILITY and limiting IMMORAL ACTIONS. Western Civilization does not engage in conflation, so RELIGION, MORALITY, and LAW are different disciplines. Stephan practices Moral Philosophy,and I Practice Moral LAW. (Positive advocacy vs Negative threat). Same Msg We require BOTH. Positive advocacy for the purpose of pedagogy, and negative prohibition for limits. This is why Stephan’s work and mine overlap so much, but ‘sound’ different. He’s a teacher, I’m a prosecutor. And if you understand scientific epistemology that’s how it functions: positive THEORY and negative TEST. Stephan made a career out of educating. I’ve made a body of law, and I teach prosecutors. It’s that simple. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Racist Paul Krugman – Wishing White People Dead Even Sooner

    (profound) (read) (share) —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor? Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it? Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to? Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition? Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital? Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms? You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold? What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)? We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents? If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech. If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then. Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction? With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right? We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman. There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law. Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science. Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience. And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit. And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital. And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries. I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold. WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • The Racist Paul Krugman – Wishing White People Dead Even Sooner

    (profound) (read) (share) —“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor? Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it? Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to? Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition? Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital? Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms? You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold? What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)? We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents? If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech. If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then. Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction? With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right? We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman. There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law. Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science. Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience. And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit. And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital. And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries. I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold. WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • I want to drink 30 year scotch from Paul Krugman’s Skull as we drag the Nobel Co

    I want to drink 30 year scotch from Paul Krugman’s Skull as we drag the Nobel Committee away in chains. #NewRight #endleftistpseudoscience

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-27 23:55:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/803024506918944772