I think that all of us search for mindfulness by the means available to us and that for some of us that is from analytic to spiritual, and some from spiritual to analytic.
As far as I know mindfulness must facilitate control over our lives, and therefore those of us with control and satisfaction are more incentivized seek analytic mindfulness alone, and those of us that have less control and are less satisfied seek increasingly spiritual forms. That appears to be the causal relationship.
Many people have taken what they needed and moved on. And that is what I expect of people.
Propertarianism is just like any other science. Some of us want to investigate more deeply for its own sake, some of us want to affect change to the world, and some of us want to affect internal change – and as such propertarianism is just a technology to help it.
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
“I’m incredibly bored with scientistic calculations of the reproductive exchange
—“I’m incredibly bored with scientistic calculations of the reproductive exchanges between genetic configurations of homo economus.”— Joel Davis
I wish I could make everyone bored.
I would love it if someday everyone could treat such calculations as utterly mundane – and obvious.
That would mean my mission was accomplished.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 20:17:00 UTC
-
“I’m incredibly bored with scientistic calculations of the reproductive exchange
—“I’m incredibly bored with scientistic calculations of the reproductive exchanges between genetic configurations of homo economus.”— John Dow I wish I could make everyone bored. I would love it if someday everyone could treat such calculations as utterly mundane – and obvious. That would mean my mission was accomplished. -
“I’m incredibly bored with scientistic calculations of the reproductive exchange
—“I’m incredibly bored with scientistic calculations of the reproductive exchanges between genetic configurations of homo economus.”— John Dow I wish I could make everyone bored. I would love it if someday everyone could treat such calculations as utterly mundane – and obvious. That would mean my mission was accomplished. -
THE CONSEQUENCE OF MONOPOLY, LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR, SEX AND LACK OF AGENCY B
THE CONSEQUENCE OF MONOPOLY, LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR, SEX AND LACK OF AGENCY
By Igor Rogov
People without fully developed agency cannot consent to sex, unless the sex is non-reproductive and perfectly safe and also produces no bad feelings on a short or a long run.
Which current law development is aiming toward anyway. Because the law in “all-inclusive society with no borders” has to embrace the lowest common denominator.
Well to the point, there is no age of consent for people with no agency or doubtful/ not fully developed one.
How could it be? Likewise is no consent as such for drunk woman; all sex with her is rape, unless it is done by an eunuch or a lesbian. I perfectly understand the roots of this feminist logic, although the outcomes look bizarre and inhumane.
But if we somehow can pass the exam on our agency and then take control of ourselves, we may say good bye to these roots and weakly proletariat sprouts coming out of them and the ever increasing State authority trying to take care of all this wilted vegetation.
By “we” I mean potentially any human, but in practice – not so many.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 19:14:00 UTC
-
The Consequence Of Monopoly, Lowest Common Denominator, Sex And Lack Of Agency
By Igor Rogov People without fully developed agency cannot consent to sex, unless the sex is non-reproductive and perfectly safe and also produces no bad feelings on a short or a long run. Which current law development is aiming toward anyway. Because the law in “all-inclusive society with no borders” has to embrace the lowest common denominator. Well to the point, there is no age of consent for people with no agency or doubtful/ not fully developed one. How could it be? Likewise is no consent as such for drunk woman; all sex with her is rape, unless it is done by an eunuch or a lesbian. I perfectly understand the roots of this feminist logic, although the outcomes look bizarre and inhumane. But if we somehow can pass the exam on our agency and then take control of ourselves, we may say good bye to these roots and weakly proletariat sprouts coming out of them and the ever increasing State authority trying to take care of all this wilted vegetation. By “we” I mean potentially any human, but in practice – not so many. -
The Consequence Of Monopoly, Lowest Common Denominator, Sex And Lack Of Agency
By Igor Rogov People without fully developed agency cannot consent to sex, unless the sex is non-reproductive and perfectly safe and also produces no bad feelings on a short or a long run. Which current law development is aiming toward anyway. Because the law in “all-inclusive society with no borders” has to embrace the lowest common denominator. Well to the point, there is no age of consent for people with no agency or doubtful/ not fully developed one. How could it be? Likewise is no consent as such for drunk woman; all sex with her is rape, unless it is done by an eunuch or a lesbian. I perfectly understand the roots of this feminist logic, although the outcomes look bizarre and inhumane. But if we somehow can pass the exam on our agency and then take control of ourselves, we may say good bye to these roots and weakly proletariat sprouts coming out of them and the ever increasing State authority trying to take care of all this wilted vegetation. By “we” I mean potentially any human, but in practice – not so many. -
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24313336_10155937565797264_89863445
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/24313336_10155937565797264_8986344564523540686_o_10155937565797264.jpg Reece Edward HaynesMy lecturer told me that there are different conceptions of what natural law is depending on which of its supporters you speak to within the academic community. I felt that such a response from him was just typical subjectivism (he is a self-described Marxist) but what do you make of it?Dec 05, 2017 9:18pmCurt DoolittleWell, I have a very precise decision of natural law as purely empirical: reciprocity (tort).Dec 05, 2017 10:02pmJacob Liam YoungmanI imagine this is more brilliant than I can comprehend.Dec 05, 2017 10:29pmGary KnightYou’re an excellent copy writer.
This set of phrases should open the podcast.Dec 06, 2017 6:49am
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 18:50:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24300909_10155937538492264_9117
photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24300909_10155937538492264_911747720454807717_n_10155937538492264.jpg The current vision of the original idea.
454 Casull with 30mm Grenade Launcher.Jon JonathanWould feel a lot more comfortable shooting it if it had a folding “arm brace”.Dec 05, 2017 6:44pmCurt Doolittleman up. lol ;)Dec 05, 2017 6:47pmJack RiänThe barrel porting is all the recoil reduction you’d need. LolDec 05, 2017 6:50pmJon JonathanThe grenade launcher’s barrel isn’t ported.Dec 05, 2017 6:53pmIgor RogovYeah, that’s what you need when fighting your sex doll hacked by Chinese agents.Dec 05, 2017 7:24pmEly Harman”Too much recoil” is just another way of saying “not enough PT.”Dec 05, 2017 8:27pmCurt DoolittleRecoil from a 40mm ~= 20ga. light.Dec 05, 2017 8:57pmJon Jonathanhttp://www.guns.com/2012/02/17/the-pfeifer-zeliska-the-revolver-in-600-nitro-express/Dec 05, 2017 8:57pmDaniel Roland AndersonI was just out shooting 40mm today from an H&K GLM. The consensus was (after about 30 chalk rounds each) that the GLM beats you up more than the Barrett .50 semi-auto.
The GLM seems to talk to your shoulder more than the H&K 69 with the identical round. But it’s cold today.
After a few rounds, that LONG trigger gets noticeable.
(I wonder what the M79 “Blooper” was like.)Dec 05, 2017 9:04pmCurt Doolittlesearch for videos. It’s not much.Dec 05, 2017 10:00pmCurt DoolittleA 12 guage from the hand is pretty tough. A 20 ga is not.Dec 05, 2017 10:00pmRolo TomasiHow heavy is that?Dec 06, 2017 1:01amCurt DoolittleI dunno how to weigh pixels.
But if it ever was built, I’d assume that given the smith and wesson full size 500 runs to 76 ounces, and the Taurus Raging Bull 454 about the same, I would think it’d weigh close to 5lbs fully loaded. (a bag of flour). The upper vane is unnecessary reinforcement, and the nonsense at the hammer as well. And it’s hard for me to estimate the weight of the launcher, or the means of trigger (I’d recommend a second trigger) but it’d be in the 5lb pound family I’m sure.
you could always beat someone with it….. lolDec 06, 2017 1:07amDaniel Roland AndersonAlmost nothing irritates me more than when I ask someone for an estimate and they say “I have no idea.” That answer is almost always false.
You gave a damned reasonable estimate of weight here.Dec 06, 2017 1:15amJon JonathanAdd another 1.5 pounds for 6 rounds of 400 grain .454 Casull. I don’t know the weight of the grenade.Dec 06, 2017 1:31amMaxim V FilimonovAutistic as hell.Dec 06, 2017 5:03amCurt Doolittledoin my job man. lolDec 06, 2017 10:26am
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 18:38:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/AJesterWearsAHornedCrown_10155937479802264/24909615_1015593753
photos_and_videos/AJesterWearsAHornedCrown_10155937479802264/24909615_10155937537482264_6361132109103279911_n_10155937537482264.jpg Bill Joslin”Engage” said captain curtDec 05, 2017 7:51pmGabriel Schmeiske LaportEl GeneralDec 05, 2017 7:54pm
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 18:37:00 UTC