Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • I’m Extremely Pissed Off At How I Am Being Treated By People And I Suspect It Is Due To Racism. I Am Not White And People Have Hurled Racial Slurs And Have Deliberately Tried To Disrespect Me For No Reason. What Can I Do To Stop This From Occurring?

    What are the chances that you are actually stating the truth rather than fabricating this question? Do you know what hints you gave us?

    https://www.quora.com/I’m-extremely-pissed-off-at-how-I-am-being-treated-by-people-and-I-suspect-it-is-due-to-racism-I-am-not-white-and-people-have-hurled-racial-slurs-and-have-deliberately-tried-to-disrespect-me-for-no-reason-What-can-I-do-to-stop-this-from-occurring

  • Dec 28, 2017, 9:42 PM

    https://www.quora.com/How-is-Roman-slavery-different-from-American-slavery/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=74114499&srid=u4QvUpdated Dec 28, 2017, 9:42 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 21:42:00 UTC

  • Unpleasant Truths In A Complete Answer

    —-“Should whites pay reparations for colonialism?’— I wonder, if white people ( Native Europeans) should collect taxes (Income) for their spread of Aristotelianism (Science), Natural Law under Reciprocity by Tort (Rule of Law), Accounting, Finance, Banking, Credit, and Interest, and The suppression of systemic corruption and in doing so dragging the whole of humanity kicking and screaming, in one revolt after another out of ignorance, superstition, hard physical labor, child labor, poverty, diseases, infanticide, and tyranny in less than 500 years. When beginning with the Abrahamic Dark Age (Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the world had made little caloric progress for almost two thousand years.) As far as I know, the only mistake white people have made is entering into a civil war with cousins in Germany, that was initiated by communists, starting in Russia, and spreading like islam today (westward) to the point of internal exhaustion, and therefore leaving the colonial problem incomplete, and therefore leaving so much of the world to struggle through the long process of corruption-suppression, rule of law development, and middle class development, while the only western peoples left standing (Americans, Australians, and Canadians) were geographically isolated from the less developed peoples – all of whom still struggle with corruption, truthfulness, rule of law, moral commerce, and dysgenic reproduction rates. WHAT DOES THE WORLD OWE THE GREEKS AND ROMANS? WHAT DOES THE WORLD OWE NATIVE NORTHERN EUROPEANS (WHITES)?
  • TRUTHS IN A COMPLETE ANSWER —-“Should whites pay reparations for colonialism?’

    https://www.quora.com/Should-white-people-pay-reparations-for-their-collective-colonial-pasts/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=23a1c6a7&srid=u4QvUNPLEASANT TRUTHS IN A COMPLETE ANSWER

    —-“Should whites pay reparations for colonialism?’—

    I wonder, if white people ( Native Europeans) should collect taxes (Income) for their spread of Aristotelianism (Science), Natural Law under Reciprocity by Tort (Rule of Law), Accounting, Finance, Banking, Credit, and Interest, and The suppression of systemic corruption and in doing so dragging the whole of humanity kicking and screaming, in one revolt after another out of ignorance, superstition, hard physical labor, child labor, poverty, diseases, infanticide, and tyranny in less than 500 years. When beginning with the Abrahamic Dark Age (Judaism, Christianity and Islam, the world had made little caloric progress for almost two thousand years.)

    As far as I know, the only mistake white people have made is entering into a civil war with cousins in Germany, that was initiated by communists, starting in Russia, and spreading like islam today (westward) to the point of internal exhaustion, and therefore leaving the colonial problem incomplete, and therefore leaving so much of the world to struggle through the long process of corruption-suppression, rule of law development, and middle class development, while the only western peoples left standing (Americans, Australians, and Canadians) were geographically isolated from the less developed peoples – all of whom still struggle with corruption, truthfulness, rule of law, moral commerce, and dysgenic reproduction rates.

    WHAT DOES THE WORLD OWE THE GREEKS AND ROMANS?

    WHAT DOES THE WORLD OWE NATIVE NORTHERN EUROPEANS (WHITES)?Updated Dec 28, 2017, 7:53 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 19:53:00 UTC

  • the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity toward

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Warren-Buffett-considered-republican-or-democrat-Why/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=e1e41bdf&srid=u4QvFrom the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity toward the republican party over Lincoln’s civil war. This led to the Democratic and Republican parties having both conservative and classical liberal members.

    Beginning between 76 and 80 this began to change because the democratic party had been captured more aggressively by the radical left and the feminists. Plus the left had used immigration starting in 1964 as a means of achieving the socialist revolution (tearing down the american experiment) through demographic warfare where they had failed by propaganda and pseudoscience (marxism, boazianism, freudianism, cantorian mathematics, and keynesian post marxist economics.)

    By and large the democratic effort has been effective for large business and finance. So many large business owners that serve the unproductive, laboring, working, and lower middle classes (what he invests in), are better off with policy that increases consumption.

    Whereas the republican (Aristocratic) is far more concerned with accumulating capital in Human (eugenic), behavioral (normative), institutional (rule of law by tort reciprocity – not rule BY legislation), and territorial than current consumption which consumes human capital (dysgenic, dysnormative, discretionary rather than reciprocal.)

    So between his AGE, his REGION, and his INTERESTS he votes for conservative democratic policies.Updated Dec 28, 2017, 7:38 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 19:38:00 UTC

  • It Runs In The Family….

    On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA. (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.) Personnel The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”. ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. ) (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )
  • It Runs In The Family….

    On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA. (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.) Personnel The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”. ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. ) (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )
  • RUNS IN THE FAMILY…. On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Repor

    https://everipedia.org/wiki/Doolittle_Report%2C_1954/IT RUNS IN THE FAMILY….

    On intelligence agencies…..

    Summary

    The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA.

    (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.)

    Personnel

    The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”.

    ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. )

    (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )Updated Dec 28, 2017, 6:32 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 18:32:00 UTC

  • Is It Possible A Racialist Really Knows Anything About Communism?

    AN UNPLEASANT BUT TRUTHFUL ANSWER TO A QUESTIONABLE QUESTION

    —-”Is it possible a racialist really knows anything about communism? “—

    I bet I know more about both subjects than anyone else you can find. And it’s not even that hard. Communism is a pseudoscientific restatement of Judaism. And it failed like Judaism failed – and Libertarianism, because neither reflects human behavior, and neither constructs commons. And commons are the means by which agrarians defeated the pastoralists in the ancient world. And commons are the means by which industrialists defeated agrarians in the modern world. Yet Judaism, libertarianism, seek to abandon all commons, and communism seeks to abandon all property. Meanwhile social democracy and classical liberalism seek only to compete over the production of dysgenic underclass or a eugenic middle class commons. Classical liberals understand agency and are willing to suppress underclass reproduction to achieve it. Social democrats understand lack of agency and are will to expand underclass reproduction to subsidize it.

    As for racial realism, people act racially in all circumstances IF THEY CAN AFFORD TO, or can use it to advance their political power or use it to retain their political power, because political power provides control over the production of commons that advance eugenic, dysgenic, and genetic warfare.

    We are no different from any other living organism. We compete on behalf of our genes. We just do a very good job of justifying our actions as moral, rather than warfare on behalf of our genes.

    We have done very poorly under a century of marxist pseudoscience: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard/Rand, Strauss, and the modern fictionalism (outright lying where pseudoscience failed) of it we call Postmodernism.

    No more lies. People demonstrate their actions in large numbers and they are measurable. That science says nothing but that we act in our rational genetic and self interest at all times, and all our speech is merely attempts to negotiation an advantage via deception (reciprocity) rather than engage in reciprocal trade – meritocracy.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-a-racialist-really-knows-anything-about-communism

  • Is It Possible A Racialist Really Knows Anything About Communism?

    AN UNPLEASANT BUT TRUTHFUL ANSWER TO A QUESTIONABLE QUESTION

    —-”Is it possible a racialist really knows anything about communism? “—

    I bet I know more about both subjects than anyone else you can find. And it’s not even that hard. Communism is a pseudoscientific restatement of Judaism. And it failed like Judaism failed – and Libertarianism, because neither reflects human behavior, and neither constructs commons. And commons are the means by which agrarians defeated the pastoralists in the ancient world. And commons are the means by which industrialists defeated agrarians in the modern world. Yet Judaism, libertarianism, seek to abandon all commons, and communism seeks to abandon all property. Meanwhile social democracy and classical liberalism seek only to compete over the production of dysgenic underclass or a eugenic middle class commons. Classical liberals understand agency and are willing to suppress underclass reproduction to achieve it. Social democrats understand lack of agency and are will to expand underclass reproduction to subsidize it.

    As for racial realism, people act racially in all circumstances IF THEY CAN AFFORD TO, or can use it to advance their political power or use it to retain their political power, because political power provides control over the production of commons that advance eugenic, dysgenic, and genetic warfare.

    We are no different from any other living organism. We compete on behalf of our genes. We just do a very good job of justifying our actions as moral, rather than warfare on behalf of our genes.

    We have done very poorly under a century of marxist pseudoscience: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard/Rand, Strauss, and the modern fictionalism (outright lying where pseudoscience failed) of it we call Postmodernism.

    No more lies. People demonstrate their actions in large numbers and they are measurable. That science says nothing but that we act in our rational genetic and self interest at all times, and all our speech is merely attempts to negotiation an advantage via deception (reciprocity) rather than engage in reciprocal trade – meritocracy.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-a-racialist-really-knows-anything-about-communism