Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • 1 – Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rat

    1 – Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 18:15:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948981108036849666

    Reply addressees: @KyleHen44723716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948847618138034176


    IN REPLY TO:

    @KyleHen44723716

    @curtdoolittle A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948847618138034176

  • I’m a fan of both. 😉

    I’m a fan of both. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 01:36:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948729820917260288

    Reply addressees: @RealJamesWoods @Twitter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948708188471279616


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RealJamesWoods

    My New Year’s resolution on @Twitter is to be as positive as possible and entertain all points of view with dignity. So many people recently have graciously complimented my work, while disagreeing with my politics. I don’t want to feel any divisiveness with these very kind fans.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948708188471279616

  • Is There Anything In Trump’s History That Provides A Positive Perspective On His Character?

    He is more accomplished than you can ever imagine being. So much so that living in the White House is ‘slumming’.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-there-anything-in-Trumps-history-that-provides-a-positive-perspective-on-his-character

  • Why Did The Russian Collusion Story Wither Out? How Soon Until Hillary Is Declared President?

    There never was any collusion. It was just typical nonsense from the left when their dream collapsed.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-did-the-Russian-collusion-story-wither-out-How-soon-until-Hillary-is-declared-president

  • Is There Anything In Trump’s History That Provides A Positive Perspective On His Character?

    He is more accomplished than you can ever imagine being. So much so that living in the White House is ‘slumming’.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-there-anything-in-Trumps-history-that-provides-a-positive-perspective-on-his-character

  • A FUZZY LANGUAGE QUESTION…. LET’S FIX IT. —-”Since the ideological core of Ameri

    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Since-the-ideological-core-of-America-is-a-individualistic-democracy-what-makes-you-think-that-a-fascist-movement-would-be-more-popular-with-the-American-populaceTHAT’S A FUZZY LANGUAGE QUESTION…. LET’S FIX IT.

    —-”Since the ideological core of America is a individualistic democracy, what makes you think that a fascist movement would be more popular with the American populace? (https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Since-the-ideological-core-of-America-is-a-individualistic-democracy-what-makes-you-think-that-a-fascist-movement-would-be-more-popular-with-the-American-populace)”—-

    America was founded as a ‘third way’ free of both church and state, and instead for the entrepreneurial (meritocratic) individual. The original colonists recruited heavily ‘people of good character’ to create that ‘third way’ The constitution constructed rule by “The natural law of reciprocity”, and individual sovereignty (although they used the world liberty).

    This meant that all functions of society were organized into markets. You could perform service, with service you could earn property, with property you could earn voice.

    Meanwhile the court adjudicated differences entirely by property rights. This was ‘the third way’ that they were inventing. A third way not done before. Or at least, the third way that had continued from Anglo Saxon times, and was under attack during the colonial period.

    So it is that America was founded under rule of law. Not rule of legislation. rule of LAW. With legislation being little more than contract negotiated between the states, just as contracts were negotiated within the state, and within the polity, and between individuals.

    This is why those of us educated pre-marxism-postmoderism’s takeover of the school, academy, media and state during and the vietnam war, treat the constitution as ‘sacred’. Because for all intents and purposes – it is. It is ‘inviolate’. Unfortunately, beginning with the 14th amendment, then increasingly during the 20th century, the left was able to destroy rule of law, and re-implement rule-by-legislation, and then eventual restore the church, with a secular religion of postmodernism.

    **FASCISM/NATIONALISM VS COMMUNISM/UNIVERSALISM**

    Fascism, meaning **economic and cultural nationalism**, was developed to counter the spread of **global communism. **

    There is very little difference between **FrankfurtSchool Marxism**, and it’s successor, **Postmodern School Political correctness** – and world communism. Just as there is very little difference between j**udaism, christianity, and islam** and **world communism**.

    So if you are from a good family, clan, tribe, and nation, you might choose nationalism over globalism. And if you are from a not-so-good family, clan, tribe, and nation you might choose globalism.

    People tend to follow the elites that promise them a competitive advantage. This is why people in homogenous societies vote by class blocks, and in heterogeneous societies they vote in racial and tribal and religious blocks: to obtain advantage via the force of government, rather than through market competition in the service of others.

    So Fascism is just a practical means by which KIN GROUPS (Nationalists) protect themselves from MAJORITY TYRANNY (Corporatists) by resisting universalism.

    Who do you want to get ahead? Well that depends upon what elites you can put into place to get your agenda ahead.

    Some of us are wired (like females) for the short term and experiential, and some of us are wired (like males) for the long term and capital accumulation.

    The strange thing is, nationalists are happy to separate and let others do as they will, but universalists are not?

    Why is that?

    The only answer CAN BE that one fears facing the reality of one’s inferiority in competition with kin groups.Updated Dec 31, 2017, 7:38 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-31 19:38:00 UTC

  • That’s A Fuzzy Language Question…. Let’s Fix It.

    —-”Since the ideological core of America is a individualistic democracy, what makes you think that a fascist movement would be more popular with the American populace? (https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Since-the-ideological-core-of-America-is-a-individualistic-democracy-what-makes-you-think-that-a-fascist-movement-would-be-more-popular-with-the-American-populace)”—- America was founded as a ‘third way’ free of both church and state, and instead for the entrepreneurial (meritocratic) individual. The original colonists recruited heavily ‘people of good character’ to create that ‘third way’ The constitution constructed rule by “The natural law of reciprocity”, and individual sovereignty (although they used the world liberty). This meant that all functions of society were organized into markets. You could perform service, with service you could earn property, with property you could earn voice. Meanwhile the court adjudicated differences entirely by property rights. This was ‘the third way’ that they were inventing. A third way not done before. Or at least, the third way that had continued from Anglo Saxon times, and was under attack during the colonial period. So it is that America was founded under rule of law. Not rule of legislation. rule of LAW. With legislation being little more than contract negotiated between the states, just as contracts were negotiated within the state, and within the polity, and between individuals. This is why those of us educated pre-marxism-postmoderism’s takeover of the school, academy, media and state during and the vietnam war, treat the constitution as ‘sacred’. Because for all intents and purposes – it is. It is ‘inviolate’. Unfortunately, beginning with the 14th amendment, then increasingly during the 20th century, the left was able to destroy rule of law, and re-implement rule-by-legislation, and then eventual restore the church, with a secular religion of postmodernism. **FASCISM/NATIONALISM VS COMMUNISM/UNIVERSALISM** Fascism, meaning **economic and cultural nationalism**, was developed to counter the spread of **global communism. ** There is very little difference between **FrankfurtSchool Marxism**, and it’s successor, **Postmodern School Political correctness** – and world communism. Just as there is very little difference between j**udaism, christianity, and islam** and **world communism**. So if you are from a good family, clan, tribe, and nation, you might choose nationalism over globalism. And if you are from a not-so-good family, clan, tribe, and nation you might choose globalism. People tend to follow the elites that promise them a competitive advantage. This is why people in homogenous societies vote by class blocks, and in heterogeneous societies they vote in racial and tribal and religious blocks: to obtain advantage via the force of government, rather than through market competition in the service of others. So Fascism is just a practical means by which KIN GROUPS (Nationalists) protect themselves from MAJORITY TYRANNY (Corporatists) by resisting universalism. Who do you want to get ahead? Well that depends upon what elites you can put into place to get your agenda ahead. Some of us are wired (like females) for the short term and experiential, and some of us are wired (like males) for the long term and capital accumulation. The strange thing is, nationalists are happy to separate and let others do as they will, but universalists are not? Why is that? The only answer CAN BE that one fears facing the reality of one’s inferiority in competition with kin groups.
  • That’s A Fuzzy Language Question…. Let’s Fix It.

    —-”Since the ideological core of America is a individualistic democracy, what makes you think that a fascist movement would be more popular with the American populace? (https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Since-the-ideological-core-of-America-is-a-individualistic-democracy-what-makes-you-think-that-a-fascist-movement-would-be-more-popular-with-the-American-populace)”—- America was founded as a ‘third way’ free of both church and state, and instead for the entrepreneurial (meritocratic) individual. The original colonists recruited heavily ‘people of good character’ to create that ‘third way’ The constitution constructed rule by “The natural law of reciprocity”, and individual sovereignty (although they used the world liberty). This meant that all functions of society were organized into markets. You could perform service, with service you could earn property, with property you could earn voice. Meanwhile the court adjudicated differences entirely by property rights. This was ‘the third way’ that they were inventing. A third way not done before. Or at least, the third way that had continued from Anglo Saxon times, and was under attack during the colonial period. So it is that America was founded under rule of law. Not rule of legislation. rule of LAW. With legislation being little more than contract negotiated between the states, just as contracts were negotiated within the state, and within the polity, and between individuals. This is why those of us educated pre-marxism-postmoderism’s takeover of the school, academy, media and state during and the vietnam war, treat the constitution as ‘sacred’. Because for all intents and purposes – it is. It is ‘inviolate’. Unfortunately, beginning with the 14th amendment, then increasingly during the 20th century, the left was able to destroy rule of law, and re-implement rule-by-legislation, and then eventual restore the church, with a secular religion of postmodernism. **FASCISM/NATIONALISM VS COMMUNISM/UNIVERSALISM** Fascism, meaning **economic and cultural nationalism**, was developed to counter the spread of **global communism. ** There is very little difference between **FrankfurtSchool Marxism**, and it’s successor, **Postmodern School Political correctness** – and world communism. Just as there is very little difference between j**udaism, christianity, and islam** and **world communism**. So if you are from a good family, clan, tribe, and nation, you might choose nationalism over globalism. And if you are from a not-so-good family, clan, tribe, and nation you might choose globalism. People tend to follow the elites that promise them a competitive advantage. This is why people in homogenous societies vote by class blocks, and in heterogeneous societies they vote in racial and tribal and religious blocks: to obtain advantage via the force of government, rather than through market competition in the service of others. So Fascism is just a practical means by which KIN GROUPS (Nationalists) protect themselves from MAJORITY TYRANNY (Corporatists) by resisting universalism. Who do you want to get ahead? Well that depends upon what elites you can put into place to get your agenda ahead. Some of us are wired (like females) for the short term and experiential, and some of us are wired (like males) for the long term and capital accumulation. The strange thing is, nationalists are happy to separate and let others do as they will, but universalists are not? Why is that? The only answer CAN BE that one fears facing the reality of one’s inferiority in competition with kin groups.
  • My answer to Why do people say it’s not their responsibility to explain issues o

    My answer to Why do people say it’s not their responsibility to explain issues of social justice, racism, and oppre… https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-say-its-not-their-responsibility-to-explain-issues-of-social-justice-racism-and-oppression-when-they-also-say-a-white-straight-man-can-never-experience-these-things/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=13e49771


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-30 01:02:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/946909372805939201

  • LOOK AT SUCH PEOPLE AS UNGRATEFUL CHILDREN.* —-”What do Americans think of the f

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-Americans-think-of-the-fact-that-their-country-is-seen-almost-everywhere-on-Earth-as-the-most-arrogant-and-bellicose-country-responsible-of-the-death-of-millions-of-innocent-people/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=208c31e8&srid=u4Qv*WE LOOK AT SUCH PEOPLE AS UNGRATEFUL CHILDREN.*

    —-”What do Americans think of the fact that their country is seen almost everywhere on Earth as the most arrogant and bellicose country responsible of the death of millions of innocent people?”—-

    What do Americans think? You mean uneducated or educated, or educated and knowledgeable, or educated, and knowledgeable, and experience americans?

    For the educated, and knowledgeable and experience American, we feel quite rightly that the world is ungrateful for westerners and americans dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, child death, early death, disease, tyranny. Yes, the european empires tried to drag the world out of a 2000 year dark age and did so profitably. And yes during the world wars, they collapsed and failed to finish the job. And yes, america post-war forced those countries to modernize thesleves rather than directly ruling them as did the colonizers. And yes, communism, socialism, and islamic fundamentalism are all means by which the world resisted being dragged out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, child death, early death, disease, and tyranny.

    And yes, we are trying to stop the spread of regressive islam, the same way stopped the spread of regressive socialism, and the same way we stopped the spread of regressive communism. Unfortunately, we are internally under attack by the newest pseudoscientific pseudo rational religion called ‘postmodernism’. And we are no longer in the economic position to fight internal cults (postmodernism that owns our universities and media and government), nor are we in the position to hold states and people accountable for their rule. Nor arwe we in the position to rule states directly. Because the cost is just too high compared to a century ago.

    The USA has had a simple policy since the end of the world war that is unstated:

    **1 **- This kind of war must never happen again – mankind will end.

    **2** – We can prevent such a war from happening by bringing all people into an interdependent economic world order. Economic cooperation changes ‘conflicts’ from physical to economic, cultural, and informational. Iis still conflict, but it is less bad than war.

    **3** – People will pursue the interdependent economic world order for the simple reason that they would prefer the comforts of consumer capitalism than to be envious of those that have them.

    **4** – We can achieve this by a) preventing expansion of state power, b) directing states to producing human rights (all of which are but property rights), c) advancing democracy so that states will work at human rights (property rights) and then by consequences, join the world economic order out of self interest. d) advancing the self determination of peoples, but retaining borders.

    The problem with this set of goals is that:

    **a**) most peoples are not demographically advanced enough to adopt consumer capitalism, rule of law, and democracy. Familialism and corruption are too common in the rest of the world, and only northern europeans have succeeded in eliminating it. (Read Fukuyama for some of the reasons why)

    **b**) americans have said ‘self determination’ and ‘democracy’ (The Carrot) but have not spoken the consequence (The Stick). Which is ‘if you choose poorly we will punish your government, and by consequence punish you.)

    **c**) Had we completed the colonial ( modernization) project in russia, china, and finally in the middle east, rather than abandoning those peoples, we may have made this process less full of conflict, as did the british in their colonies. but at present we are still struggling with russian, chinese, iranian, pakistani aggression, and unfortunately, north Korea’s threat.

    We have paid a high price in blood and treasure where we could just have easily ruled the world exploitatively and by force – without much effort at all. What other people would do such a thing?

    How many people has Islam killed? How many have Communists Killed?

    How many have westerners dragged out of ignorance, superstition, poverty and disease?

    Our entire project is nothing more than trying to prevent another world war in the process of dragging people out of the abrahamic (jewish, christian, muslim->Marxist-Socialist, Postmodernist, fundamentalist) dark age.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian InstituteUpdated Dec 29, 2017, 10:38 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-29 10:38:00 UTC