you need more followers. can i promote your page?
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 19:54:00 UTC
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Well. I can’t make it thru the woo woo to agree or not. 😉
Well. I can’t make it thru the woo woo to agree or not. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 19:27:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019664868931186688
Reply addressees: @georgiegirl1828
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019657568971640833
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019657568971640833
-
I’m saying why do we choose to advocate for or against either party, and is ther
I’m saying why do we choose to advocate for or against either party, and is there something to be learned from it?
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 17:28:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019635053616300032
Reply addressees: @IgnatiusBalliol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019634076217741314
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019634076217741314
-
Seeding a discourse (which on FB has become interesting)
Seeding a discourse (which on FB has become interesting)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 17:23:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019633749531783168
Reply addressees: @IgnatiusBalliol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019626460716335104
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019626460716335104
-
correct
correct
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 17:08:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019629969834741761
Reply addressees: @dagmar_schmitt
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019627417474756608
IN REPLY TO:
@GudistGrug
@curtdoolittle Perhaps partially because mandella was part of an underachieving group so the herd morality excused his crimes and elevated him. While hitler was part of an over achieving group (enough to flagged a predator perhaps) so his crimes were magnified and he is denigrated?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019627417474756608
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 14:29:57 UTC
-
Untitled
https://twitter.com/SRCHicks/status/1019584761788956673/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=SRCHicks&utm_content=1019584761788956673https://twitter.com/SRCHicks/status/1019584761788956673/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=SRCHicks&utm_content=1019584761788956673
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 10:29:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 10:29:00 UTC
-
corrected on op
corrected on op
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 03:37:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019425854647095296
Reply addressees: @Gyeff
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019425520067403783
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019425520067403783
-
“Curt purposely writes for (very) high-IQ people who have a lot of contextual un
—“Curt purposely writes for (very) high-IQ people who have a lot of contextual understanding already in place. Some of his stuff is difficult for me and I’m 135-140 (some of it I have to make an effort to “get” which I’m not accustomed to). That being said Curt’s posts/writing have gotten a lot more accessible over time IMO. But some of it can’t be simplified all that much or too much important detail is lost. At the same time, many of the key insights and their ramifications I believe can be explained to avg IQ audiences (maybe even sub-100 if communicated well) in basic form. Some detail will be lost in that process, but it will be valuable for normal folks to understand the basic what & why, while all the detail will be available to the high IQ men who will be implementing it (ruling). Curt has said before that he is relying on people in the 130-140 range to carry his ideas down the IQ range.”—John Mark
