Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

omg….. Why? What opportunities were possible to exploit at that period that ar

omg….. Why? What opportunities were possible to exploit at that period that are not open to exploitation now?

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 20:12:30 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020038694865195008

Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020037973482459136

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020037973482459136

July 19, 2018
So you don’t understand. It’s ok to just say you don’t understand. So since you

So you don’t understand. It’s ok to just say you don’t understand. So since you don’t undrestand you can’t make an argument – other than to say you don’t understand. You could however answer the question of what capital changes are measured and what are not and why.

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 20:06:45 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020037245577891848

Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020036337087361024

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020036337087361024

July 19, 2018
(a) I started with the Treatise and then read the General Theory. (b) Only an in

(a) I started with the Treatise and then read the General Theory.
(b) Only an intellectually dishonest person would launch a criticism rather than answering the argument. I’ll forgive you.
(c) What capital is measured and what capital is not measured?

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 18:40:16 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020015482093625351

Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020011938686722048

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020011938686722048

July 19, 2018
Curt Doolittle updated his status. UM THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION IS A HOAX NOT FORGER

Curt Doolittle updated his status.

UM THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION IS A HOAX NOT FORGERY
(more wiki leftism)

I’m not sure it’s true to claim that the document is a forgery (copy), since it reproduces nothing, and seeks no profit from false attribution. It is a fiction, propaganda, or hoax.

For example,
– Crichton’s Eaters of the Dead is a fictional account attributed to Ibn Fadlan. It is a fiction, but not propaganda.
– The Voynich Manuscript is a Hoax, but it is not propaganda.

The Protocols is’s clearly a Hoax, and clearly Propaganda.

As far as I know ‘inflationary language’ (misrepresenting it as a crime of forgery or fraud) is a form of deception just as pseudoscientific claims, and pseudo-rational (sophistry) are a deception.

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 15:17:07 UTC

July 19, 2018
I’ll put it in the queue. 😉

I’ll put it in the queue. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 12:38:33 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019924454401507328

Reply addressees: @georgiegirl1828

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019920091725561857

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019920091725561857

July 19, 2018
Curt Doolittle shared a post

Curt Doolittle shared a post.

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 12:30:05 UTC

July 19, 2018
UM THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION IS A HOAX NOT FORGERY (more wiki leftism) I’m not sure

UM THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION IS A HOAX NOT FORGERY

(more wiki leftism)

I’m not sure it’s true to claim that the document is a forgery (copy), since it reproduces nothing, and seeks no profit from false attribution. It is a fiction, propaganda, or hoax.

For example,

– Crichton’s Eaters of the Dead is a fictional account attributed to Ibn Fadlan. It is a fiction, but not propaganda.

– The Voynich Manuscript is a Hoax, but it is not propaganda.

The Protocols is’s clearly a Hoax, and clearly Propaganda.

As far as I know ‘inflationary language’ (misrepresenting it as a crime of forgery or fraud) is a form of deception just as pseudoscientific claims, and pseudo-rational (sophistry) are a deception.

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 11:17:00 UTC

July 19, 2018
i make the mistake often but I didnt author of the question – only answer it

i make the mistake often but I didnt author of the question – only answer it.

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 03:36:16 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019787983858356224

Reply addressees: @i_aver

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019787084310069249

IN REPLY TO:

@i_aver

@curtdoolittle “From” whence is redundant!

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019787084310069249

July 19, 2018
Curt Doolittle wrote on Oliver Westcott’s timeline. you need more followers. can

Curt Doolittle wrote on Oliver Westcott’s timeline.

you need more followers. can i promote your page?

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 23:54:16 UTC

July 18, 2018
answer to From whence do you belive your rights, as a human being, derive?

https://t.co/40D3aSEemLMy answer to From whence do you belive your rights, as a human being, derive? https://t.co/40D3aSEemL

Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 23:24:00 UTC

July 18, 2018