photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44184014_10156717418827264_7635335697661952000_o_10156717418802264.jpg Paul Tripp*your
;)Oct 18, 2018 9:45pmWilliam Viergeverditto </pedant-off> 😇Oct 18, 2018 9:55pmGreg HamiltonI’m tempted to say = I don’t really have an argument.Oct 18, 2018 11:40pmHoward Van Der KlauwWe will have to sack him now that you grammar Nazis have found a mistake.Oct 20, 2018 5:28am
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 20:10:00 UTC
lolz. The fact that the liberals don’t ‘get’ the ‘inner monolog’ observation as evidence they don’t get the function of inner monologs… the irony is painful.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 19:18:00 UTC
October 18th, 2018 9:32 AM EVOLA VS DOOLITTLE by Ahmed Reda [W]e live in a natural world. The Mere belief in an old order and the mere feeling of how that order looks like or how it would look like in this age is not the right way to re-evolve it. Evola and Doolittle are observing the same thing, but the holes of Doolittle’s sieve are much smaller compared to those of Evola’s. If Evola and Doolittle are to observe, for example, the solar system, Evola would propose that the reason a planet orbits the sun is that its matter has some kind of tendency for orbiting or a sort of motility. But Doolittle WILL explain that the reason a planet orbits the sun is a central force which varies exactly inversely as the square distance from the center. Now what I’m aiming at is that while Evola knows exactly what he wants to impose, he lacks A THEORY, he lacks a scientific language that would’ve helped him in understanding what he intuited, and therefore he fell into many traps, one of them is the savior myth. What we need is a scientific research paper that uses measurements and organizational charts not intuitions and poetic licenses.
October 18th, 2018 9:32 AM EVOLA VS DOOLITTLE by Ahmed Reda [W]e live in a natural world. The Mere belief in an old order and the mere feeling of how that order looks like or how it would look like in this age is not the right way to re-evolve it. Evola and Doolittle are observing the same thing, but the holes of Doolittle’s sieve are much smaller compared to those of Evola’s. If Evola and Doolittle are to observe, for example, the solar system, Evola would propose that the reason a planet orbits the sun is that its matter has some kind of tendency for orbiting or a sort of motility. But Doolittle WILL explain that the reason a planet orbits the sun is a central force which varies exactly inversely as the square distance from the center. Now what I’m aiming at is that while Evola knows exactly what he wants to impose, he lacks A THEORY, he lacks a scientific language that would’ve helped him in understanding what he intuited, and therefore he fell into many traps, one of them is the savior myth. What we need is a scientific research paper that uses measurements and organizational charts not intuitions and poetic licenses.
October 18th, 2018 9:45 AM
HOPPE VS DOOLITTLE [H]oppe is right they way Newton was right: explanatory power with the wrong causal theory. I provided the correct causal theory. Because as a german he relied on rationalism, morality and volition, and as an anglo I rely on science, law, and force.
October 18th, 2018 9:45 AM
HOPPE VS DOOLITTLE [H]oppe is right they way Newton was right: explanatory power with the wrong causal theory. I provided the correct causal theory. Because as a german he relied on rationalism, morality and volition, and as an anglo I rely on science, law, and force.
HOPPE VS DOOLITTLE
Hoppe is right they way Newton was right: explanatory power with the wrong causal theory. I provided the correct causal theory. Because as a german he relied on rationalism and morality and volition, and as an anglo I rely on science and law, and force.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 13:45:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052918709239644160
HOPPE VS DOOLITTLE
Hoppe is right they way Newton was right: explanatory power with the wrong causal theory. I provided the correct causal theory. Because as a german he relied on rationalism and morality and volition, and as an anglo I rely on science and law, and force.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 09:45:00 UTC
EVOLA VS DOOLITTLE
by Ahmed Reda
We live in a natural world. The Mere belief in an old order and the mere feeling of how that order looks like or how it would look like in this age is not the right way to re-evolve it. Evola and Doolittle are observing the same thing, but the holes of Doolittle’s sieve are much smaller compared to those of Evola’s. If Evola and Doolittle are to observe, for example, the solar system, Evola would propose that the reason a planet orbits the sun is that its matter has some kind of tendency for orbiting or a sort of motility. But Doolittle WILL explain that the reason a planet orbits the sun is a central force which varies exactly inversely as the square distance from the center. Now what I’m aiming at is that while Evola knows exactly what he wants to impose, he lacks A THEORY, he lacks a scientific language that would’ve helped him in understanding what he intuited, and therefore he fell into many traps, one of them is the savior myth. What we need is a scientific research paper that uses measurements and organizational charts not intuitions and poetic licenses.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 09:32:00 UTC
thx. shared. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-17 22:18:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052685351100325888
Reply addressees: @GMikailovich @NewRightAmerica
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052682336309993472
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052682336309993472