So for example, you just engaged in the following deceptions:
1) That the economic history of the world and europe has anything to do with being educated in a european country.
2) That taxation is equivalent to corruption and capital sequestration
3) That whether you are ‘convinced’ or not is a matter of the truth or falsehood of an argument – rather than a measure of your dishonesty.
4) The charity by the church, obtained by deceit, corruption, and rents was somehow comparable to the economic consequences of their corruption, deceit, rents, and capital sequestering.
5) That the (insignificant) rate of intellectual, technological, material, progress under the church was vastly lower, and that what progress that WAS made was due to the aristocracy and the military, metallurgy, and trade despite the church’s mandate of ignorance.
6) That Aristotle was somehow not practicing the european traditional method of legal-empirical argument, and applying it as a means of correcting Plato’s idealism, and that it is necessary to be of greek (now greco-anatolian) origin to categorize his thought as european.
7) That it was not the eastern non-roman empire in collusion with the egyptian and syrian that intentionally destroyed roman civilization through suppression of it’s traditions, closing of its schools, burning of its buildings, and murder of its teachers and rulers.
I mean, that’s a lot of lies in half a dozen comments.
And you want me to take you as other than a perfect demonstration of the abrahamic method of deceit: Sophism, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism?
I mean you just illustrated my point so thoroughly that it’s hard to imagine anyone could be that intellectually dishonest without studying how to be.
I don’t want to counter-signal the statement, but I am not sure where I would have said that precisely. I think the median we had in the past, and need going forward, is closer to 112-115 than current 99/100.That would produce a pareto distribution (80/20) close to that number.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46520663_10156793787532264_3605722489210011648_n_10156793787527264.jpg (humor)Amit EmmGreat postsNov 21, 2018, 11:28 AMJesse GarciaBy the Gods I hope the Windows XP thing is true.Nov 21, 2018, 11:32 AMAndrea RoyallIt’s the little things.. ♥️Nov 21, 2018, 11:40 AMSteven KolpekGain nerd points by using Windows 2000 instead of XPNov 21, 2018, 12:16 PMHoward Van Der KlauwHey thats no laughing matter, I was running XP in VMWare on my Mac until recently so I could keep using my 20 year old accounting software on it.Nov 21, 2018, 2:33 PMAnjin BodhisattvaLINUXNov 21, 2018, 4:24 PMSteven KolpekOh absolutely. LINUX users should also know how stable and well supported Windows 2000 is to this day; the OS is free, even.Nov 21, 2018, 4:43 PMBill JoslinI loved XPNov 21, 2018, 9:13 PMGreg Hamiltonit’s still on my windows machines …Nov 21, 2018, 9:22 PMConnor SumnersEveryone knows true Propertarians only use TempleOSNov 23, 2018, 6:16 AM(humor)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46520663_10156793787532264_3605722489210011648_n_10156793787527264.jpg (humor)Amit EmmGreat postsNov 21, 2018, 11:28 AMJesse GarciaBy the Gods I hope the Windows XP thing is true.Nov 21, 2018, 11:32 AMAndrea RoyallIt’s the little things.. ♥️Nov 21, 2018, 11:40 AMSteven KolpekGain nerd points by using Windows 2000 instead of XPNov 21, 2018, 12:16 PMHoward Van Der KlauwHey thats no laughing matter, I was running XP in VMWare on my Mac until recently so I could keep using my 20 year old accounting software on it.Nov 21, 2018, 2:33 PMAnjin BodhisattvaLINUXNov 21, 2018, 4:24 PMSteven KolpekOh absolutely. LINUX users should also know how stable and well supported Windows 2000 is to this day; the OS is free, even.Nov 21, 2018, 4:43 PMLuan RaphaelFrom Scratch, and it explains the hermit part too.Nov 21, 2018, 8:48 PMBill JoslinI loved XPNov 21, 2018, 9:13 PMGreg Hamiltonit’s still on my windows machines …Nov 21, 2018, 9:22 PMConnor SumnersEveryone knows true Propertarians only use TempleOSNov 23, 2018, 6:16 AM(humor)
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46513881_10156793254527264_4450314467799990272_o_10156793254522264.jpg Piero ThymiopoulosLol, that was my reply to your post.
I don’t understand your attacks on NS.
In the same hand, I’m not sure if you were being ironic but you called yourself fascist.Nov 21, 2018, 9:42 AMJeff UrizenThey are monstrosities is rightNov 21, 2018, 9:44 AMChristopher HallAn identity is defined by what is and is not.Nov 21, 2018, 9:44 AMAnthony MigchelsHitler’s implementation of National Socialism was absolutely totalitarian. Both in theory and in practice.
The economy was completely State dominated, with Industry’s role (besides massive profiteering) being merely to produce what the State demanded, and all boys were taken by the Hitler Jugend at a very early age, and few parents dared say no. The State in effect reared the boys, and while they loved it, they were in fact prepared for the Front.
Also note that point 25 of the National Socialist 25 point Manifesto reads:
“For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich. Unlimited authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its organizations in general. The forming of state and profession chambers for the execution of the laws made by the Reich within the various states of the confederation. The leaders of the Party promise, if necessary by sacrificing their own lives, to support by the execution of the points set forth above without consideration.”Nov 21, 2018, 9:58 AMPiero ThymiopoulosNov 21, 2018, 10:03 AMAnthony MigchelsI don’t see at all what bearing this has on my comment?!
And while Hitler was right about the Jews, he was hardly the ‘first’. In fact: in late 19th century Germany hundreds of top level German elites actually came together to see what to do about the JQ in Germany. Their conclusion: it’s too late. The Jew’s money scams had already enslaved and bought everybody at that stage.
And of course: Hitler attacked the little Jews, and he let the Big Jews escape to Britain and the US, before the war.Nov 21, 2018, 10:42 AMEthan TriceNational socialism and fascism are authoritarian. Communism is totalitarian. The degree of influence of the state is the key. In an authoritarian state, you’re ok if you keep your head down. In a totalitarian one, you may be killed if you don’t praise it enough. Obviously the treatment of the jews in nazi germany makes one think of totalitarianism, but that was more a status crime.Nov 21, 2018, 11:04 AMErik LukovskyWhat was this meeting called? With the German elites? Is there a record of this? I would like to read about it because I’ve never really heard about that before
Jews were not ruling industries until the Jewish enlightenment which only occurred in the 19th centuryNov 21, 2018, 11:04 AMAnthony MigchelsI can’t find it right now Erik, but I have asked the site’s owner, I’ll let you know.Nov 21, 2018, 11:18 AMAnthony MigchelsEthan, I don’t think I can agree with your definition of totalitarian. Classically totalitarian is about the level of State intrusion in both public and private life, and National Socialism was heavy handed in both regards, especially historically.
Today, with the simply unreal State overreach under ‘democracy’ (open rule of the filthy rich), people can be forgiven for thinking it might not have been so bad under National Socialism, but besides Stalin and the Communist Party in Beijing, few States have controlled the economy so tightly ever. With the exception, of course of the Pharao’s, who ruled like the NWO wants to rule, but that’s another question.Nov 21, 2018, 11:21 AMAnthony MigchelsErik, here it is:
https://justice4poland.com/2018/10/07/1882-dresden-anti-jewish-manifesto-explains-nwo/Nov 21, 2018, 11:34 AMEthan TriceAnthony Migchels I mean you may not agree with it, but that doesn’t really matter (I can say I don’t like the definition of something, but unless I offer an alternative definition, ideally with evidence for other people using it that way, the first definition is all we have to go on). As you said, totalitarianism is about the level of state intrusion in both public and private life. The problem is you’re viewing that in a vacuum. All governments have *some* intrusion in both public and private life, but not all governments are totalitarian. the degree of intrusion of fascism or national socialism is far less than that of communism but far more than that of a libertarian state. it’s a sliding scaleNov 21, 2018, 11:43 AMPaul TrippNazism > Fascism. The biggest difference between National Socialism and Natural Selectionism is that Natural Selectionism moves the focus from the race to the gene, while recognizing that races are a product of our genes, as are individuals.Nov 21, 2018, 9:58 PM
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Um. Apparently (a) you haven’t been there lately, (b) don’t read much, and (c) don’t know what ‘communism’ refers to … and (d) don’t mind wasting my time.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
