Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47323056_10156816557502264_7925710310466387968_n_10156816557497264.jpg Kari Anne DorstadSo nudity causes Causes Violence? I don’t understand this chart !!!!Jan 7, 2019, 9:00 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47430582_10156816557512264_3017721791142428672_n_10156816557507264.jpg Kari Anne DorstadWhy is sex and nudity in blue ? Just wondering !!!Jan 7, 2019, 8:58 PMCurt DoolittleI have no idea. I think it’s the default value?Jan 7, 2019, 9:00 PMKari Anne DorstadWhat are considered Intimate images?Jan 7, 2019, 9:43 PMKari Anne DorstadCurt Doolittle how can say you don’t know ? I actually thought for real that you knew everything ! I really did !!very silk on part ! But now I know that you don’t know everything!!!! Thank God ! I was starting to get paranoid thinking you knew about all things that were untruthful ! Now I know you can’t possibly know about every lie that comes out of someone s mouth somewhere ! Oh well I thought my Dad knew everything too, but now I think he just might know more then I think !Jan 7, 2019, 9:48 PMCurt Doolittlehuh? It means PORN.
This menu is for reporting people who post inappropriate things. it’s largely to protect facebook from lawsuits.
They don’t allow porn. they don’t allow nudity in public groups. they do allow eroitic images in closed groups.
The reason they don’t allow porn is that they can’t be sure its free of minors. That’s the real reason. The other is that streaming porn is expensive for servers.
The other is that it attracts the online sex services business (prostitution).
So they just ban it to keep it off the platofrm.Jan 7, 2019, 9:48 PMKari Anne DorstadCurt Doolittle well can I use that to report on un asked for dic pics from punks I trusted on Facebook?Jan 7, 2019, 9:50 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47324516_10156816557482264_5599011124746911744_n_10156816557477264.jpg FB Nicely Clarifies Categories of Inappropriate Posts
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47048758_10156816116342264_4460706927151677440_n_10156816116337264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47356078_10156816116697264_7198913500800876544_n_10156816116692264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47151740_10156816113127264_3632448468670218240_n_10156816113122264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47249479_10156816112927264_8917371452559196160_n_10156816112922264.jpg Bryan Nova BreyFor the Hayekian Triangle there is “stages of production” but there is not “stages of consumption.”
I don’t like when there is asymmetry in measurements.
I understand price x demand curves, yet I’m not sure what is edifying about these triangles.Dec 4, 2018, 12:37 AMBryan Nova BreyAdd stages of consumption.
I see that both you and Bill clarify what each of these stages are. If both lines have staged then you’d get a grid inside the triangle.Dec 4, 2018, 12:59 AM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47391831_10156816124077264_590423106867167232_n_10156816124072264.jpg Bryan Nova BreyThat’s cool it’s a surfing calculation.Dec 1, 2018, 11:03 AMACQUISITION AND THE SUPPLY DEMAND CURVE (And Hayekian Triangles).
by Bill Joslin
(Important concept) (“The Grammar of Social Relations.”)
We (Propertarians) often use spectrums, but do so in a linear fashion a-b-c etc. A line in a single dimension, possibly two. Start to end or minimum to maximum. There is always, for any point on the spectrum, a vertical dimension which is context or frame. (CD: usually it’s scale.) We presume, properly, the existential frame, but without explicit expression it leaves us open to frame manipulation.
The vertical dimension would be context – we’re always low context, but there might be something to including in what domain of existence we’re referring to for a spectrum, or accounting for all domains along with the spectrum.
An example: aquisitionalism on a base biological level (domain)-> acquisition of calories and mating opportunities.
Aquisitionalism on an individual level (domain) -> pursuit of “goods’
Aquisitionalism on a social level (domain)-> acquisition of signals and opportunity
Aquisitionalism on a societal level (domain) -> acquisition of advantage
Without specifying or accounting for all domains, we tend to be mistaken for reductionists
—-
(Curt Doolittle Responds: )
Correct.
So we have some spectrum, some time series, and some range of context(conceptual) or conditions (existential).
So, because of (a) w can repeat series indefinitely in text, and this trains people through repetition. (b) text (This venue) does not assist us in creating graphs (supply demand curves), and (c) most people are unfamiliar with Hayekian Triangles, which is how these things are optimally communicated. (d) I am … let us say ‘leery’ of illustrating all these concepts in hayekian triangles, despite the fact that in my mind, I model all these concepts in Gary Becker’s supply and demand curves of Social Science Incentives. (Which is how I plan to teach the class: getting the students to draw all of them.) This converts the textual to the graphical.
So. *A series should define a supply demand curve.*
—THE GRAMMARS OF SOCIAL RELATIONS —
IDEAL TYPE
Hyper Generalization (overgeneralization). an Ideal. This is how most people converse in ordinary language.
SERIES
Hierarchy (series) = The Production Cycle (commonly)
CURVE
Supply = Volume (quantity, amount)
Demand = Criteria for Choice
Intersection = Choice
TRIANGLES
Production Cycle
Possible Production Range
Amount of investment vs trust required.
EQUILIBRIUM BETWEEN COMPETING TRIANGLES
(Mapping two or more curves together)
DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC EQUILIBRIUM MODELS
(how economics is performed today)
So please forgive me if I speak in legal argument using series presuming the user can grasp that I speak in curves not lines.
Because if I wrote at any greater level of complexity, (a) the demand on my time would be logarithmic, (b) it would only be fit for academic publication, and not for production of LAW COMPREHENSIBLE BY MEN.
–GRAMMARS–
Note that this pattern of grammars exists EVERYWHERE in every discipline.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47048758_10156816116342264_4460706927151677440_n_10156816116337264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47356078_10156816116697264_7198913500800876544_n_10156816116692264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47151740_10156816113127264_3632448468670218240_n_10156816113122264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47249479_10156816112927264_8917371452559196160_n_10156816112922264.jpg Bryan Nova BreyFor the Hayekian Triangle there is “stages of production” but there is not “stages of consumption.”
I don’t like when there is asymmetry in measurements.
I understand price x demand curves, yet I’m not sure what is edifying about these triangles.Dec 4, 2018, 12:37 AMBryan Nova BreyAdd stages of consumption.
I see that both you and Bill clarify what each of these stages are. If both lines have staged then you’d get a grid inside the triangle.Dec 4, 2018, 12:59 AM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/47391831_10156816124077264_590423106867167232_n_10156816124072264.jpg Bryan Nova BreyThat’s cool it’s a surfing calculation.Dec 1, 2018, 11:03 AMKari Anne DorstadI would not even be able to begin to figure this out ? LolJan 7, 2019, 9:01 PMACQUISITION AND THE SUPPLY DEMAND CURVE (And Hayekian Triangles).
by Bill Joslin
(Important concept) (“The Grammar of Social Relations.”)
We (Propertarians) often use spectrums, but do so in a linear fashion a-b-c etc. A line in a single dimension, possibly two. Start to end or minimum to maximum. There is always, for any point on the spectrum, a vertical dimension which is context or frame. (CD: usually it’s scale.) We presume, properly, the existential frame, but without explicit expression it leaves us open to frame manipulation.
The vertical dimension would be context – we’re always low context, but there might be something to including in what domain of existence we’re referring to for a spectrum, or accounting for all domains along with the spectrum.
An example: aquisitionalism on a base biological level (domain)-> acquisition of calories and mating opportunities.
Aquisitionalism on an individual level (domain) -> pursuit of “goods’
Aquisitionalism on a social level (domain)-> acquisition of signals and opportunity
Aquisitionalism on a societal level (domain) -> acquisition of advantage
Without specifying or accounting for all domains, we tend to be mistaken for reductionists
—-
(Curt Doolittle Responds: )
Correct.
So we have some spectrum, some time series, and some range of context(conceptual) or conditions (existential).
So, because of (a) w can repeat series indefinitely in text, and this trains people through repetition. (b) text (This venue) does not assist us in creating graphs (supply demand curves), and (c) most people are unfamiliar with Hayekian Triangles, which is how these things are optimally communicated. (d) I am … let us say ‘leery’ of illustrating all these concepts in hayekian triangles, despite the fact that in my mind, I model all these concepts in Gary Becker’s supply and demand curves of Social Science Incentives. (Which is how I plan to teach the class: getting the students to draw all of them.) This converts the textual to the graphical.
So. *A series should define a supply demand curve.*
—THE GRAMMARS OF SOCIAL RELATIONS —
IDEAL TYPE
Hyper Generalization (overgeneralization). an Ideal. This is how most people converse in ordinary language.
SERIES
Hierarchy (series) = The Production Cycle (commonly)
CURVE
Supply = Volume (quantity, amount)
Demand = Criteria for Choice
Intersection = Choice
TRIANGLES
Production Cycle
Possible Production Range
Amount of investment vs trust required.
EQUILIBRIUM BETWEEN COMPETING TRIANGLES
(Mapping two or more curves together)
DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC EQUILIBRIUM MODELS
(how economics is performed today)
So please forgive me if I speak in legal argument using series presuming the user can grasp that I speak in curves not lines.
Because if I wrote at any greater level of complexity, (a) the demand on my time would be logarithmic, (b) it would only be fit for academic publication, and not for production of LAW COMPREHENSIBLE BY MEN.
–GRAMMARS–
Note that this pattern of grammars exists EVERYWHERE in every discipline.
(FWIW: It has been nearly impossible to replace you as host of a show. Only Moritz came close. Dylan could have done it, but is enraptured by authoritarianism. Pomen,Joe, and Joel might yet be able to. Mark has his own content. Noah his own. But no one is better. Not even Roman.)
@ChimmyRich @curtdoolittle @MartianHoplite Curt has a lot of great ideas and he has helped me grow in my own ideas tremendously. What is the main thing you’ve learned from the podcasts? Or Curt?
You clearly haven’t followed me long enough to understand the game. The person doing this job, the person I am as a CEO, the person I am in discourse, and the person I am among family and friends are quite different people.
My job is to play king of the hill and bait men to try to take me down. This is how men learn best. It is the method of professing, teaching, debating that is the least affected by norm, signaling, and pretense. It is how men can and should be taught.
Those that can’t learn as men – I understand. But if they can’t they are of no use as judges.
