Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52498681_10156980434342264_5122284834521088000_o_10156980434332264.jpg THE TWO OBJECTIONSConnor CreeganI guess I would say that the problem lies in the assumption that there is a valid motivational arm correspondent with the arm of your philosophy. You’ve stated before that your system has a “demand” for an aesthetic component, but any reasonable aesthetic component will naturally run contrary to it because literary experiences are, in essence, at odds with excessive use of operational language. So which is it, do we “read Siege” to motivate revolution only to prosecute against the publication of Siege once regime change has occurred, or do we remain purists and hope that present measured material incentives are enough?Feb 12, 2019, 3:31 PMCurt DoolittleNot logical. There is plenty of motivational content that is not false. I just don’t say what political organization, and what mythology, and what mission one must choose – because theya re utilitarian.
I lay out what I think the optimum (most competitive) form of government is that will provide the highest returns for european peoples. I suggest what I think might be the optimum religious content.
But propertarianism like law is ‘via negativa’. Anything that is not false or parasitic is ‘good’. I don’t need to choose ‘the good’ I just need to remove all ‘bad’.
If you need to lie to do it and it includes parasitism on your own then it is not a good. It’s just admission of failure.
Your argument is that all goods consist of lies, and that’s false.Feb 12, 2019, 5:03 PMConnor CreeganDeception, in your philosophy, is contingent on the intended rejection of operational language, is it not?Feb 12, 2019, 5:08 PMCurt Doolittle????Feb 12, 2019, 6:17 PMZach QuarryThe legal system is a different way to apply violence. Before applying physical violence.Feb 12, 2019, 6:17 PMConnor CreeganAm I misunderstanding how you define and identify purposeful deception?Feb 12, 2019, 6:24 PMCurt DoolittleI have no idea because I don’t know what you’re implying.
any display word or deed is free of imposition of costs,
and therefore free of retaliation.
Therefore it is truthful and moral.
We can never know if a statement is true (critical naturalism). We can only know that we have exhausted due diligence sufficient for the demand for due diligence given the promise, claim, testimony we are making.
This is Propertarian Natural Law’s epistemology: “Testimonialism’, or what some call ‘Critical Naturalism’.Feb 12, 2019, 6:47 PMTHE TWO OBJECTIONS
Adam, would you consider, even under an alias, assisting me in a canadian sponsored podcast, that is a dispute over metaphysics and the meaning of the term in the old world and the new? I am not sure this is really something you want to get into but I think I could use your help?
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52156672_10156980116932264_6547672682064773120_o_10156980116922264.jpg UM YOU ARE WELCOME TO THE MEMBERS OF “THE STUPID PARTY”Charles M TriplettI though John Mark’s YouTube videos were really good. How does she feel he’s a liability? He articulates his position excellently.Feb 11, 2019, 6:29 PMCurt DoolittleI think it’s just GSRRM ploy and claiming knowledge she does not have. In other words, appeal to false authority, or false evidence, under cover of GSRRM.Feb 11, 2019, 6:42 PMGreg HamiltonLol. Random thot says therefore cut him loose he’s a liability !Feb 11, 2019, 6:45 PMZach QuarryYeah, nah! I’m sold on what would pretty much stop us from fighting the left wing for eternity. One fight to rule them all, and in the darkness separate and punish them. Oof! Added alittle more to it.Feb 11, 2019, 7:06 PMDylan KnowlesYour vibe attracts your tribeFeb 11, 2019, 7:35 PMEdmund BlackadderHow does she arrive at the idea John Mark is a liability?Feb 11, 2019, 7:52 PMAlex RobinsonI’m entirely ignorant of the context of your conversation Curt, but could you further elaborate what you mean by the universalist for women and tribe for men comment?Feb 11, 2019, 7:58 PMCurt Doolittlereproductive strategies of female and male are different and are in competition. Which is something that’s been in the lit forever. Not a surprise. The fact that our cog biases reflect this is something the postmoderns rallied against, but cog sci has demonstrated otherwise. People are like any other domesticated animal. But because we can speak, and negotiate, we have consciousness. But our consiousness is even more influenced by our genes (biology) than the other way ’round.Feb 11, 2019, 8:33 PMCurt Doolittlein other words we do not so much know what we are doing as know what we are doing in the context of our reproductive strategy.Feb 11, 2019, 8:38 PMJarrod MarmaHis spread is attracting criticism and accusations that he (or Curt himself) is a fed. I personally will blame his anonymity as a large source of the problem because John Mark I know you might have a separate life that you don’t want entangled but a lot of hypocrisy can be seen in demanding truth while wearing a disguise. I have respect for what you’re doing and I understand possible lines of reasoning, but it didn’t seem like Curt addressed that unheard question that is possibly causing a good deal of hesitance among followers. If we’re going to demand honesty shouldn’t we lead with it?
(I have real pictures of me on my account if you want to point at my profile picture too)Feb 11, 2019, 9:12 PMCurt Doolittleit is of an asset value for john to be an achetype rather than an individual. As an archetype you can criticize his ideas or not. As an individual you can engage in ad homs. And as far as I know all I attribute this line of argument to, is GSSRM against not being able to use ad homs for the purpose of GSSRM rather than argument – which is what stupid people do. It’s all they can do.Feb 11, 2019, 9:26 PMAlex RobinsonYou’re saying that because of the way our reproductive organs work, men prefer small communities where women prefer large ones? I hope you understand if that isn’t accurate, you were vague lol.Feb 11, 2019, 9:31 PMCurt DoolittleJohn simply finds the utility of riffing off the “Anonymous” branding valuable. He will tell you otherwise but that’s the reason.Feb 11, 2019, 9:50 PMCurt DoolittleThe Anonymous and V for Vendetta brands are exeptional to riff off of.Feb 11, 2019, 9:51 PMJarrod MarmaAs long as the profits aren’t going to Warner Bros. 🤣Feb 11, 2019, 9:54 PMCurt DoolittleI actually have no idea who he is but I”m betting on a very small graphic arts firm, or web development company in the midwest or south. At least that’s my read.Feb 11, 2019, 9:54 PMEdmund BlackadderOr DisneyFeb 11, 2019, 9:55 PMCurt Doolittleoh don’t tell me stuff like that. it makes me cringe.Feb 11, 2019, 9:55 PMCurt Doolittle( just trying to be economical to keep up with the load tonight…. men think and work in hierarchical packs and women tend to work in a herd with herd morality (no one left behind) simple pseudoscientific version is r/k selection. )Feb 11, 2019, 10:13 PMAlex RobinsonCurt Doolittle gotcha, I see your point now. I’m very interested in going deeper but I can wait the topic to come up.Feb 11, 2019, 10:36 PMChristian KalafutThe Roman Empire was the most universalist entity in the ancient world and yet you praise it?Feb 12, 2019, 11:33 AMCurt DoolittleIt wasn’t universalist. It was a market for religions as long as they recognized the atuority of rome. They integrated sects the way english integrates words.Feb 12, 2019, 12:40 PMCurt DoolittleRome was a commercial empire, not a despotic or religious.Feb 12, 2019, 12:48 PMUM YOU ARE WELCOME TO THE MEMBERS OF “THE STUPID PARTY”
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52008483_10156979249227264_1576289393184866304_o_10156979249222264.jpg Steve SlonkyWhat do these pussy boys have to say about the Yellow Vests?Feb 11, 2019, 9:40 AMEric BurkettImagine being afraid of pissing off people openly, joyously exterminating you with your own money.Feb 11, 2019, 11:05 AMEric BurkettThey call them socialists destroying private property like spoiled children. Seriously.Feb 11, 2019, 11:05 AMCaduceus MercuriusPrivate and public property. Not all individual yellow vests, but their collective does.
The yellow vest collective is also strenghtening the police state with weekly doses of mild insurrection. Sort of like the immune system is strengthened by repeated exposure to mild pathogens or vaccines.
Also noteworthy is that they do not have a very clear set of demands. For example, although many of the protesters would like to see less non-White immigration, they have not explicitly stated that anywhere.
The positive side: many people can participate (whether left or right, peaceful or violent). The downside: in the end it will not have any meaningful effect. It may even lead to MORE enslavement by international bankers, higher taxes to repair all the traffic cameras etc.. Crashing an economy is not without risk…
I consider the yellow vest movement a fine example of mob psychology. It’s undisciplined violence.Feb 11, 2019, 12:02 PMCaduceus MercuriusNothing wrong with damaging some public property if you have a solid plan and it’s absolutely necessary. To stage a coup, you’ll have to do much worse than throw rocks at cops. You may have to kill some, and even their horses, dogs etc.
But this yellow vest movement doesn’t have a plan. It’s semi-violent, not ultra-violent. They simply get themselves hurt.Feb 11, 2019, 12:10 PMSteve SlonkyAppreciate the replies, and not to be inflammatory, but all I hear is rationalizing doing jack shitFeb 11, 2019, 12:12 PMCaduceus MercuriusREAD SIEGEFeb 11, 2019, 12:35 PMCurt DoolittleCaduceus Mercurius Um. My online handle when I wasn’t in public was “UltraV!olence”. Don’t assume that because we don’t TALK about a plan, that we don’t HAVE a plan.Feb 11, 2019, 12:40 PMCaduceus MercuriusYes, I know Curt. I’d say your plan, which I’m broadly familiar with, is very different from the weekly yellow vest approach.Feb 11, 2019, 12:42 PMCaduceus MercuriusYour “um” here indicates that you interpreted my comments as pertaining to you. That was not the case. I was commenting on the yellow vest movement, as brought up by Steve.Feb 11, 2019, 12:49 PMCurt Doolittleah… thank you for the correction. ;)Feb 11, 2019, 12:50 PMCaduceus Mercurius”but all I hear is rationalizing doing jack shit”
My comment was explaining why I believe they will not ACHIEVE jack shit, Steve. It’s a popular uprising, which is great, but they’re not going about it in a strategic way.
I studied all the twists and turns of the French Revolution (and the later Bloody Week), and it’s not that the various victories were achieved by angry peasants carrying pitchforks. Virtually all the battles were fought and/or directed by people with military training. They planned their attacks and their retreats. They didn’t just walk around every Saturday, throwing rocks at the police.
So I’m saying the yellow vest protesters do not have a clear plan. We shouldn’t be like them. We should have a plan and think like generals or guerilla fighters. Prepare the attack, hit hard, withdraw. Prepare next attack, and repeat.Feb 11, 2019, 1:06 PMGreg RobertsAs an insurgency, you don’t have to win. All you have to do is not lose.Feb 11, 2019, 2:44 PMTravis BoydThe Yellow Vest movement is a fertile field awaiting seeds.Feb 11, 2019, 2:44 PMCaduceus MercuriusAgreed, although it’s difficult to get through to the French because so many of them don’t speak English.Feb 11, 2019, 2:46 PMZach QuarryI’ll be for hire.Feb 11, 2019, 4:25 PM
